声音商标显著性的认定
The Determination of the Distinctiveness of Sound Trademarks
摘要: 我国《商标法》在2023年进行了第五次修正,声音商标现在也可以被注册和保护。但到目前为止,我国的声音商标注册数量寥寥无几,与传统的商标注册数量相差很大。究其原因,是声音商标显著性的认定规则和方法不够完善彻底,从而导致了声音商标注册合并发展的脚步缓慢。目前现有的研究成果对声音商标显著性的认定的重要性达成了一致意见并且对进一步完善显著性认定标准提出了一些宝贵建议。然而,学术界对是否应该认可声音商标的固有显著性仍存在着很大的争议,因此声音商标制度目前还没有发展特别完善。该文章针对声音商标的显著性问题进行研究。首先对声音商标显著性的概念和类型进行了介绍,其次指出了声音商标显著性的认定的现状以及存在的一系列问题,最后提出相关的完善建议。
Abstract: China’s “Trademark Law” has been amended for the fifth time in 2023, and sound trademarks can now also be registered and protected. However, so far, the number of sound trademark registrations in China is very small, which is very different from the number of traditional trademark registrations. The reason for this is that the rules and methods for determining the distinctiveness of sound trademarks are not perfect and thorough, which leads to the slow pace of development of sound trademark registration and merger. At present, the existing research results have reached a consensus on the importance of determining the distinctiveness of sound trademarks, and put forward some valuable suggestions for further improving the criteria for determining distinctiveness. However, there is still a great deal of controversy in the academic community as to whether the inherent distinctiveness of sound marks should be recognized, so the sound mark system has not yet been developed and perfected. This paper examines the distinctiveness of sound trademarks. Firstly, the concept and types of distinctiveness of sound marks are introduced, secondly, the current status and a series of existing problems in the recognition of distinctiveness of sound marks are pointed out, and finally relevant suggestions for improvement are put forward.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
张晓晨. 声音商标司法审查中显著性认定标准的研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 上海: 上海师范大学, 2021.
|
|
[2]
|
徐超颖. 声音商标显著性认定问题研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 杭州: 浙江工商大学, 2023.
|
|
[3]
|
王亚男. 声音商标显著性认定标准的困难分析及完善建议[J]. 法制博览, 2021(21): 172-173.
|
|
[4]
|
Provost, M.-J. (2010) Canada’s Current Position with Respect to Sound Marks Registration: A Need for Change? Canadian Journal of Law and Technology, 8, Article No. 2.
|
|
[5]
|
佟菁菁. 声音商标显著性认定的国际法律规则及实践比较研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 上海: 华东政法大学, 2020.
|
|
[6]
|
贺晓栋. 我国声音商标注册与保护的法律研究[J]. 新疆社科论坛, 2021(2): 66-71.
|
|
[7]
|
曹梦婷. 声音商标显著性认定标准研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 南昌: 江西财经大学, 2023.
|
|
[8]
|
徐平. 我国声音商标显著性认定研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 无锡: 江南大学, 2022.
|
|
[9]
|
余晓仪. 探析声音商标认定的显著性标准[J]. 中华商标, 2021(11): 52-56.
|
|
[10]
|
汪振江, 陈俊熹. 论我国声音商标注册审查制度的问题与完善[J]. 科技与法律(中英文), 2023(4): 63-71.
|
|
[11]
|
贾育育. 论声音商标的法律保护[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 太原: 山西财经大学, 2022.
|
|
[12]
|
孙志峰. 以实务角度论声音商标的显著性要求[J]. 中华商标, 2021(6): 4-7.
|
|
[13]
|
胡骋. 论非传统商标的显著性认定: 价值立场与论证框架[J]. 知识产权, 2020(1): 39-50.
|
|
[14]
|
贾磊. 商标功能性原则研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 武汉: 中南财经政法大学, 2021.
|
|
[15]
|
张敏. 声音商标的显著性认定标准研究——以李佳琦申注声音商标为例[J]. 标准科学, 2022(6): 32-36+41.
|
|
[16]
|
刘宁, 刘嘉裕. 声音商标显著性判断研究[J]. 南京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 23(4): 62-69.
|
|
[17]
|
陈娟. 我国声音商标的法律保护探析——以腾讯声音商标案为例[J]. 法制与经济, 2021, 30(5): 35-40.
|
|
[18]
|
王捷. 互联网环境下声音商标显著性研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 北京: 北京邮电大学, 2021.
|