基于克里弗顿模型的信息技术与教师权威关系研究:影响、风险及重构方案
Research on the Relationship between Information Technology and Teacher Authority Based on the Clifton Model: Impact, Risk and Reconstruction Scheme
摘要: 本文探讨信息技术应用对教师权威形成的影响、利弊及成因。基于克里弗顿对权威的分类模型,发现技术通过消解知识垄断、弱化情感联结、加剧权责失衡,重构权威生成机制。技术在提升教学效率与资源共享的同时会引发多种风险。其成因包括技术去中心化及教育工具理性扩张。研究建议以明晰制度权责、人机协同教学及师生情感互动三个方面来实现数智时代教师权威的工具理性与价值理性的统一,构建新型教师权威范式。
Abstract: The article explores the impact, advantages, disadvantages, and causes of the application of information technology on the formation of teacher authority. Based on Clifton’s classification model of authority, it finds that technology reconstructs the mechanism of authority generation by dissolving knowledge monopolies, weakening emotional connections, and exacerbating imbalances of rights and responsibilities. While technology enhances teaching efficiency and resource sharing, it also triggers various risks. The causes include technological decentralization and the rational expansion of educational tools. The study suggests unifying the instrumental rationality and value rationality of teacher authority in the digital intelligence age by clarifying institutional responsibilities, promoting human-machine collaborative teaching, and enhancing emotional interaction between teachers and students to construct a new paradigm of teacher authority.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
Peabody, R.L. (1962) Perceptions of Organizational Authority: A Comparative Analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 6, 463-482.
|
|
[2]
|
段斌斌. 权利还是职权: 教师惩戒权的法律性质及立法规制——兼论《教师法》相关条款的修改[J]. 华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2024, 63(1): 175-188.
|
|
[3]
|
吴康宁. 社会变迁对教育变迁的影响: 一种社会学分析[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 1997(2): 72-80, 52.
|
|
[4]
|
慕课西部行发展报告编写组. 迈向公平之路——慕课西部行发展报告[EB/OL]. https://www.ictdedu.cn/sknews/jyxxhs/neirong/n20231220_83379.shtml, 2025-06-13.
|
|
[5]
|
中国教育新闻网. 16条负面清单! 教育部部署开展基础教育规范管理提升年行动[EB/OL]. https://www.toutiao.com/article/7509037516788433446/?upstream_biz=doubao&source=m_redirect&wid=1749975366167, 2025-06-13.
|
|
[6]
|
李思辉, 徐雪琴. 转载: 华中师范大学发布《中小学教师数字素养报告》[EB/OL]. https://eisr.ccnu.edu.cn/info/1008/20189.htm, 2025-06-13.
|
|
[7]
|
王丹华, 孟宝兴. 数智时代教师权威的消解与重构——基于雅斯贝尔斯教育权威观[J]. 教育理论与实践, 2024, 44(13): 40-45.
|
|
[8]
|
高晓文, 于伟. 教师情感劳动初探[J]. 教育研究, 2018, 39(3): 94-102.
|
|
[9]
|
雅斯贝尔斯. 什么是教育[M]. 邹进译. 北京: 生活∙读书∙新知三联书店, 1991: 45-48.
|
|
[10]
|
刘向辉. 何以为师: 教师权威的时代变迁与遭遇[J]. 当代教育论坛, 2021(5): 95-100.
|
|
[11]
|
鲍曼. 流动的现代性[M]. 欧阳景根, 译. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2002: 123-125.
|
|
[12]
|
张茂聪. 提升教育水平, 走好师范强教之路[EB/OL]. http://theory.people.com.cn/n1/2024/0903/c40531-40311582.html, 2025-06-13.
|