网约车平台安全保障义务研究
Research on Safety Assurance Obligations of Ride-Hailing Platforms
摘要: 由于科学技术的发展与交通和通信领域之间存在着不可分割的联系,社会中的交通创新正在不断扩展,人们的出行变得更加便捷,交通选择也更加丰富多样。自网约车这种方便消费者使用和获取的交通方式出现以来,交通领域发生了重大变化。网约车平台履行安全保障义务对保护民众生命安全至关重要。我国目前网约车运营模式为自有车辆直接雇佣模式、租赁车代驾模式和社会车辆加盟模式。社会车辆加盟模式作为主流模式,网约车平台和驾驶员构建了新型合作伙伴关系。网约车平台安全保障义务面临着网约车平台的法律地位不确定、安全保障义务的内容模糊和安全保障义务相应责任不明确的困境。对此,我国应明确网约车平台法律定位、保障算法公平和明确安全保障义务相应责任。
Abstract: Due to the inseparable connection between scientific and technological development and the transportation and communications sectors, transportation innovations in society are continuously expanding, making travel more convenient and offering richer, more diverse transportation options. Since the emergence of ride-hailing services—a transportation method convenient for consumers to use and access—significant changes have occurred in the transportation sector. Ride-hailing platforms’ fulfillment of safety obligations is crucial for protecting public safety. China’s current ride-hailing operational models include direct employment of company-owned vehicles, leased vehicles with designated drivers, and social vehicle franchising. As the predominant model, social vehicle franchising establishes a novel partnership between ride-hailing platforms and drivers. Ride-hailing platforms face challenges in fulfilling their safety obligations due to uncertainties in their legal status, ambiguous definitions of their responsibilities, and unclear accountability for safety failures. In response, China should clarify the legal status of ride-hailing platforms, ensure algorithmic fairness, and define the corresponding responsibilities for safety obligations.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
南方Plus. 广州网约车订单合规率全国第一! 4月全国网约车行业运行情况公布[EB/OL]. 2024-05-28. https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1800290273782925541&wfr=baike, 2025-09-07.
|
|
[2]
|
交通运输部, 工业和信息化部, 公安部, 商务部, 市场监管总局, 国家网信办. 关于修改《网络预约出租汽车经营服务管理暂行办法》的决定[Z]. 2022-11-30. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2022-12/05/content_5730599.htm, 2025-09-07.
|
|
[3]
|
新浪财经. 2024年中国网约车行业研究报告[EB/OL]. 2024-06-01. https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1800625010370522941&wfr=baike, 2025-09-07.
|
|
[4]
|
芮明杰等. 平台经济: 趋势与战略[M]. 上海: 上海财经大学出版社, 2018: 1.
|
|
[5]
|
Avocats, G. (2019) UBER reconnue en France comme un prestataire de transport. https://goldwin-avocats.com/fr/proces-cabinet-avocat-goldwin/condamnation-de-la-plateforme-uber-en-concurrence-deloyale/
|
|
[6]
|
界面快报. 加州法院裁定Uber和Lyft败诉, 要求将司机从“独立承包商”重新归类为雇员[EB/OL]. 2020-10-23. https://www.jiemian.com/article/5157616.html, 2025-09-19.
|
|
[7]
|
张素凤. “专车”运营中的非典型用工问题及其规范[J]. 华东政法大学学报, 2016, 19(6): 75-87.
|
|
[8]
|
侯登华. 共享经济下的网约车法律制度研究[M]. 武汉: 华中科技大学出版社, 2021: 21.
|
|
[9]
|
应梵. 基于安全保障义务的网约车平台侵权责任研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 大连: 大连海事大学, 2023.
|
|
[10]
|
光明网. 最高法: 企业与网约货车司机之间是否存在劳动关系要看用工事实和支配性劳动管理[EB/OL]. 2025-04-30. https://legal.gmw.cn/2025-04/30/content_38002345.htm, 2025-09-07.
|
|
[11]
|
钱玉文, 吴炯, 张金华. 论网约车平台的安全保障义务与责任——对我国《电子商务法》第38条第2款的解释与适用[J]. 浙江师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2019, 44(4): 49-59.
|
|
[12]
|
农诗竹, 李彦萍, 李晨曦, 等. 论网约车存在的问题及其法律规制[J]. 科技经济导刊, 2018(7): 200, 202.
|
|
[13]
|
夏利民, 王运鹏. 论网约车平台的侵权责任[J]. 河南财经政法大学学报, 2017, 32(6): 102-110.
|
|
[14]
|
《民法典立法背景与观点全集》编写组. 民法典立法背景与观点全集[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2020: 810.
|