电商平台知识产权侵权中避风港原则的适用困境与完善路径研究
Study on the Application Dilemmas and Improvement Paths of the Safe Harbor Principle in Intellectual Property Infringement on E-Commerce Platforms
摘要: 随着我国电子商务产业的迅猛发展,平台内知识产权侵权问题日益凸显。避风港原则作为平衡权利人、电商平台与用户三方利益的核心规则,虽经我国多部法律逐步完善,但其在电商平台知识产权侵权案件的实践应用中,仍面临有效通知标准模糊、必要措施认定混乱、红旗原则适用弱化等诸多困境。本文基于指定研究文献,通过规范分析与比较研究,系统梳理该原则在电商平台商标、专利、著作权侵权场景中的适用难题,并借鉴美国《数字千年版权法》(DMCA)、英国2013年《诽谤法》的相关经验,从重构通知规则、细化必要措施、强化红旗原则等方面提出完善路径,旨在为优化电商平台知识产权保护制度、促进数字经济健康发展提供理论支撑与实践参考。
Abstract: With the rapid development of China’s e-commerce industry, the issue of intellectual property (IP) infringement within platforms has become increasingly prominent. As a core rule for balancing the interests of right holders, e-commerce platforms, and users, the Safe Harbor Principle has been gradually improved through multiple laws in China. However, in its practical application in IP infringement cases involving e-commerce platforms, it still faces many difficulties, such as ambiguous standards for effective notices, confused identification of necessary measures, and weakened application of the Red Flag Principle. Based on designated research literature, this paper systematically sorts out the application dilemmas of this principle in the scenarios of trademark, patent, and copyright infringement on e-commerce platforms through normative analysis and comparative research. Drawing on relevant experiences from the U.S. “Digital Millennium Copyright Act” (DMCA) and the UK’s “Defamation Act” 2013, it proposes improvement paths from aspects such as reconstructing notice rules, refining necessary measures, and strengthening the Red Flag Principle. The purpose is to provide theoretical support and practical references for optimizing the IP protection system of e-commerce platforms and promoting the healthy development of the digital economy.
文章引用:姜成果. 电商平台知识产权侵权中避风港原则的适用困境与完善路径研究[J]. 电子商务评论, 2025, 14(10): 1317-1324. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2025.14103273

参考文献

[1] 贾楠. 避风港原则在网络侵权纠纷中的运用——中英比较研究[J]. 青年记者, 2014(34): 67-68.
[2] 侍丹青, 张毅菁. 从知识产权间接侵权角度构建避风港和通知-移除规则在电子商务平台的适用[J]. 法制与社会, 2018(27): 64-66.
[3] 林承铎, 安妮塔. 数字版权语境下避风港规则与红旗原则的适用[J]. 知识经济, 2016(7): 20-25.
[4] 刘晓, 叶宇皓. 民法典背景下我国避风港原则的适用困境及破解路径[J]. 知识经济, 2022(5): 28-38.
[5] 袁海龙. 避风港原则司法适用的前提与条件研究[J]. 五邑大学学报(社会科学版), 2024(1): 59-62.
[6] 张今. 避风港原则在电子商务商标侵权行为中的应用[J]. 电子知识产权, 2018(9): 43-45.
[7] 徐明. 避风港原则前沿问题研究——以通知-删除作为诉讼前置程序为展开[J]. 东方法学, 2016(5): 28-36.