AIGC在学术期刊出版领域的研究态势及热点分析
Analysis of the Research Trends and Hotspots of AGIC in the Field of Academic Journal Publishing Field
摘要: AIGC技术的迅猛发展对学术期刊出版产生了巨大影响。本文采用文献计量学分析方法,以中国知网、万方数据库、Web of Science核心合集数据库与Scopus中AIGC技术在学术期刊出版领域的研究文章为样本,借助CiteSpace知识图谱可视化从文献的时间维度、空间维度和内容维度分析国内外AIGC在学术期刊出版领域的研究现状,探究文献的分布特征、作者/机构合作网络、研究热点等学术进展与态势,并为我国学术期刊运用AIGC提供参考。结果发现,国内外均需加强不同地区机构间和作者间的合作研究,中文文献对该领域的融合发展、编辑素养、出版伦理、出版流程研究较多,英文文献对该领域的学术应用和学术伦理研究较多。
Abstract: The rapid development of AIGC technology has exerted a significant impact on academic journal publishing. This study adopts bibliometric analysis methods, taking research articles on AIGC technology in the field of academic journal publishing from CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure), Wanfang Database, Web of Science Core Collection, and Scopus as samples. Using CiteSpace knowledge graph visualization, it analyzes the research status of domestic and international AIGC in the field of academic journal publishing from the temporal, spatial, and content dimensions of the literature. It explores academic progress and trends such as the distribution characteristics of literature, author/institution collaboration networks, and research hotspots, and provides references for the application of AIGC in Chinese academic journals. The results show that both domestically and internationally, there is a need to strengthen collaborative research between institutions and authors in different regions. Chinese literature has con-ducted extensive research on the integrated development, editorial literacy, publishing ethics, and publishing processes in this field, while English literature has focused more on research regarding academic applications and academic ethics in the same field.
文章引用:贾夏利. AIGC在学术期刊出版领域的研究态势及热点分析[J]. 数据挖掘, 2025, 15(4): 310-321. https://doi.org/10.12677/hjdm.2025.154027

参考文献

[1] 刘骐荣, 张新新. 全媒体出版传播体系视域的融合出版新模式研究[J]. 科技与出版, 2024(10): 69-79.
[2] 李华君, 雷月秋. 智能出版的技术特征、伦理风险与编辑把关[J]. 中国编辑, 2024(1): 33-37, 48.
[3] 郝海平, 卢娜, 丁佐奇. 共生理论视角下AIGC-学术出版融合发展推进策略[J]. 中国出版, 2024(20): 57-63.
[4] 刘锦宏, 张子妍, 王一雪. 变化与变局: 智媒时代的出版融合发展现状及远景[J]. 中国编辑, 2024(6): 21-28.
[5] 杨涵, 张小强. 论人工智能应用给学术期刊编辑带来的机遇与挑战[J]. 编辑学报, 2023, 35(3): 258-262.
[6] 徐敬宏, 张如坤. ChatGPT在编辑出版行业的应用: 机遇、挑战与对策[J]. 中国编辑, 2023(5): 116-122.
[7] 李侗桐, 高瑞婧, 田佳. ChatGPT在中文科技期刊摘要文字编辑中的实用性测试与分析[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2023, 34(8): 1014-1019.
[8] 方卿, 丁靖佳. 人工智能生成内容(AIGC)的三个出版学议题[J]. 出版科学, 2023, 31(2): 5-10.
[9] 张萍, 张小强. 机器参与论文写作的出版伦理风险与防范对策[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2022, 33(4): 439-449.
[10] 袁源, 谢文亮. ChatGPT在学术出版应用场景中的伦理困境及其纾解之道——基于利益相关者理论的思考[J]. 科技与出版, 2023, (8): 89-96.
[11] 夏德元. AIGC时代的知识生产逻辑与出版流程再造[J]. 中国编辑, 2023(9): 46-50.
[12] 丛立先, 起海霞. 生成式AI对出版业的影响及其应对——ChatGPT应用场景的视角[J]. 新疆师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2023, 44(6): 113-122.
[13] 李嘉宁, 李梦竹. 生成式人工智能赋能传统出版: 逻辑、案例与进路[J]. 出版发行研究, 2024(8): 32-38.
[14] 倪明. Claude3Opus和Kimi在生物医学期刊同行评议中的能力评价及应用建议[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2025, 36(2): 153-163.
[15] Hosseini, M. and Horbach, S.P.J.M. (2023) Fighting Reviewer Fatigue or Amplifying Bias? Considerations and Recommendations for Use of ChatGPT and Other Large Language Models in Scholarly Peer Review. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 8, Article No. 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Curtis, N. (2023) To ChatGPT or Not to ChatGPT? The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Academic Publishing. Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, 42, 275.
[17] Dwivedi, Y.K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E.L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A.K., et al. (2023) Opinion Paper: “So What If ChatGPT Wrote It?” Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Opportunities, Challenges and Implications of Generative Conversational AI for Research, Practice and Policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, Article ID: 102642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] Lund, B.D., Wang, T., Mannuru, N.R., Nie, B., Shimray, S. and Wang, Z. (2023) ChatGPT and a New Academic Reality: Artificial Intelligence-Written Research Papers and the Ethics of the Large Language Models in Scholarly Publishing. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 74, 570-581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] Hosseini, M., Resnik, D.B. and Holmes, K. (2023) The Ethics of Disclosing the Use of Artificial Intelligence Tools in Writing Scholarly Manuscripts. Research Ethics, 19, 449-465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Carobene, A., Padoan, A., Cabitza, F., Banfi, G. and Plebani, M. (2023) Rising Adoption of Artificial Intelligence in Scientific Publishing: Evaluating the Role, Risks, and Ethical Implications in Paper Drafting and Review Process. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM), 62, 835-843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]