基于多尺度地理加权回归模型探求生态用地景观格局与季节性PM2.5之间的联系——以长江经济带下游地区为例
A Study to Explore the Association between Ecological Land Landscape Pattern and Seasonal PM2.5 Based on Multi-Scale Geographically Weighted Regression Models—Taking the Lower Reaches of the Yangtze River Economic Belt as an Example
DOI: 10.12677/gser.2025.145095, PDF,   
作者: 张 瑞, 李 婷:云南师范大学地理学部,云南 昆明;西部资源环境地理信息技术教育部工程研究中心,云南 昆明;苗培培*:云南师范大学地理学部,云南 昆明
关键词: 长江经济带下游生态用地景观格局MGWRLower Yangtze River Economic Belt Ecological Land Use Landscape Pattern MGWR
摘要: 近年来,随着城市化进程的加快,长江经济带下游地区面临着严重的PM2.5污染问题。PM2.5作为主要的空气污染物,对公众健康构成了巨大威胁。因此,探讨生态用地景观格局对PM2.5浓度的影响,寻找有效的污染防治策略,具有重要的现实意义。本研究以长江经济带下游地区为研究区域,旨在通过多尺度地理加权回归(MGWR)模型,分析2021年不同季节生态空间格局与PM2.5浓度之间的关系。研究区域涵盖江苏、浙江、安徽和上海,面积约35.03万平方公里,具有显著的季节性气候特征和复杂的景观格局。研究利用遥感数据和地理信息系统(GIS)技术,表征该地区不同季节的PM2.5浓度空间分布及生态景观格局特征。通过MGWR模型,探讨生态景观格局对PM2.5污染的多尺度和季节性影响。研究结果显示,生态用地景观格局与PM2.5浓度之间存在显著相关性,且这种相关性在不同季节表现出明显的差异。春季和秋季,生态用地面积和斑块边界复杂度对PM2.5浓度的削减作用较强;夏季,生态用地空间的破碎化程度对PM2.5浓度的影响更为显著;冬季,生态用地的聚集度和连接性对PM2.5浓度的削减作用较为明显。此外,研究还发现生态景观的多样性和连通性在减少PM2.5污染方面具有重要作用。本研究深化了对生态景观格局与PM2.5污染关系的理解,揭示了不同季节生态景观特征对PM2.5浓度的不同影响机制。研究结果为长江经济带下游地区的城市规划和环境治理提供了科学依据,有助于制定更有效的生态用地管理策略,改善空气质量,保障公众健康。
Abstract: In recent years, with the acceleration of urbanization, the lower reaches of the Yangtze River Economic Belt are facing serious pollution problems from PM2.5. As a major air pollutant, PM2.5 poses a great threat to public health. Therefore, it is of great practical significance to explore the influence of ecological land landscape pattern on PM2.5 concentration and to find effective pollution prevention strategies. Taking the lower reaches of the Yangtze River Economic Belt as the study area, this study aims to analyses the relationship between ecological spatial patterns and PM2.5 concentrations in different seasons in 2021 through a multi-scale geographically weighted regression (MGWR) model. The study area covers Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Anhui and Shanghai, with an area of about 350,300 km2, with significant seasonal climatic characteristics and complex landscape patterns. Remote sensing data and geographic information system (GIS) technology were used to characterize the spatial distribution of PM2.5 concentration and the ecological landscape pattern in different seasons in the region. Through the MGWR model, the multi-scale and seasonal effects of ecological landscape pattern on PM2.5 pollution were explored. The results show that there is a significant correlation between ecological land landscape pattern and PM2.5 concentration, and this correlation shows significant differences in different seasons. In spring and autumn, the area of ecological landscapes and the complexity of patch boundaries had a stronger effect on the reduction of PM2.5 concentrations; in summer, the degree of spatial fragmentation of ecological landscapes had a more significant effect on PM2.5 concentrations; and in winter, the degree of aggregation and connectivity of ecological landscapes had a more significant effect on the reduction of PM2.5 concentrations. In addition, the study found that the diversity and connectivity of ecological landscapes play an important role in reducing PM2.5 pollution. This study deepens the understanding of the relationship between ecological landscape patterns and PM2.5 pollution, and reveals the different mechanisms by which ecological landscape features affect PM2.5 concentrations in different seasons. The results of the study provide a scientific basis for urban planning and environmental management in the lower reaches of the Yangtze River Economic Belt, and help to develop more effective ecological land management strategies to improve air quality and protect public health.
文章引用:张瑞, 李婷, 苗培培. 基于多尺度地理加权回归模型探求生态用地景观格局与季节性PM2.5之间的联系——以长江经济带下游地区为例[J]. 地理科学研究, 2025, 14(5): 983-994. https://doi.org/10.12677/gser.2025.145095

参考文献

[1] 杨新兴, 冯丽华, 尉鹏. 大气颗粒物PM2.5及其危害[J]. 前沿科学, 2012, 6(1): 22-31.
[2] 张瑜, 肖纯凌. PM2.5对呼吸系统的影响以及呼吸道益生菌的发展前沿[J]. 中国医药导报, 2018, 15(8): 28-31.
[3] 柯益鑫, 王子林, 李卓远, 等. 卷丹多糖的结构表征及其对PM2.5暴露致小鼠急性肺损伤的影响[J]. 天然产物研究与开发, 2024, 36(8): 1385-1392.
[4] 袁小雪, 周定友, 李杰, 等. ICP-MS在PM2.5元素分析中的应用进展[J]. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2020, 40(8): 2373-2381.
[5] 巫燕园, 刘逸凡, 汤蓉, 等. 中国特大城市群PM2.5污染及健康负担的时空演变特征[J]. 南京大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 60(1): 158-167.
[6] 柴发合. 我国大气污染治理历程回顾与展望[J]. 环境与可持续发展, 2020, 45(3): 5-15.
[7] Chen, Y., Ebenstein, A., Greenstone, M., et al. (2013) Evidence on the Impact of Sustained Exposure to Air Pollution on Life Expectancy from China’s Huai River Policy. Proceedings of The National Academy of Sciences of The United States of America, 110, 12936-12941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] 汪克亮, 姜伟. 科技金融政策能否降低环境污染?——基于“促进科技与金融结合试点”的准自然实验[J]. 技术经济, 2022, 41(10): 109-121.
[9] 王占永, 陈昕, 胡喜生, 等. 植物屏障影响路边大气颗粒物分布机理及研究方法的进展[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(5): 1047-1058.
[10] 余洲, 李明玉, 钱雨扬, 等. 基于CA_Markov模型多情景模拟的三峡库区土地利用变化及其生态环境效应[J]. 水土保持研究, 2024, 31(3): 363-372.
[11] 叶深, 王鹏, 黄祎, 等. 长三角城市群城市空间形态对PM2.5与O3污染空间异质性特征的影响研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2023, 32(10): 1771-1784.
[12] 苟爱萍, 李皖新, 王江波. 重庆市绿色空间景观格局与PM2.5浓度时空相关性[J]. 地球科学与环境学报, 2024, 46(1): 25-37.
[13] 马博伦, 王雷, 滑永春. 北京市细颗粒污染物与土地覆被景观格局关联分析[J]. 林业资源管理, 2021(4): 94-103.
[14] 赵强, 谭璐, 方潜生, 等. 基于卫星资料的合肥市热岛效应时空演变及其影响因子分析[J]. 大气与环境光学学报, 2023, 18(2): 153-167.
[15] 王丽丽, 刘笑杰, 李丁, 等. 长江经济带PM2.5空间异质性和驱动因素的地理探测[J]. 环境科学, 2022, 43(3): 1190-1200.
[16] 刘励坤, 刘婷婷, 许瑞君, 等. 大气污染物短期暴露对自杀死亡风险的影响[J]. 环境卫生学杂志, 2022, 12(12): 862-869.
[17] 刘威, 蔡苗, 龙政, 等. 大气一氧化碳短期暴露与哮喘死亡关系的时间分层病例交叉研究[J]. 环境卫生学杂志, 2023, 13(4): 243-249.
[18] Yan, G.J. and Huang, X. (2021) 30 m Annual Land Cover and Its Dynamics in China from 1990 to 2019. Earth System Science Data Discussions, 13, 1-29.
[19] 徐敬, 丁国安, 颜鹏, 等. 北京地区PM2.5的成分特征及来源分析[J]. 应用气象学报, 2007, 18(5): 645-654.
[20] Wheeler, D.C. (2021) Geographically Weighted Regression. In: Handbook of Regional Science, Springer, 1895-1921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] Wu, R., Li, Z. and Wang, S. (2021) The Varying Driving Forces of Urban Land Expansion in China: Insights from a Spatial-Temporal Analysis. Science of the Total Environment, 766, Article 142591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]