泰安浅层土壤湿度与降水和气温的季节关联分析
Shallow Soil Moisture in Tai’an: Seasonal Correlations with Precipitation and Temperature
DOI: 10.12677/wjf.2025.144067, PDF,   
作者: 邹 潇, 朱 霞, 陈洪儒:泰安农业气象试验站,山东 泰安
关键词: 土壤湿度气温降水相关性Soil Moisture Temperature Precipitation Correlation
摘要: 本研究基于2015~2024年泰安市国家应用气象观测站的土壤相对湿度数据及国家基本气象站的气温和降水观测数据,采用Pearson相关系数和偏相关分析方法,探讨了不同季节条件下浅层土壤湿度与降水、气温的相关关系及其变化特征。结果表明:气温和降水呈夏季高、冬季低的典型季风气候特征。土壤湿度空间分异显著,泰安站和新泰站秋季达峰值,宁阳站和东平站冬季达峰值,肥城站春季到冬季呈持续上升趋势。夏季降水是土壤水分最有效、最稳定的补给来源,所有区域均呈显著正相关;春秋两季的降水补给作用则存在区域差异。气温是土壤水分的主要消耗因子,春季和夏季多呈反向变化,冬季低温通常对应高土壤湿度。夏秋季气温的负效应常被降水掩盖,但控制降水后,气温的独立负向影响更为显著。总体来看,降水与土壤湿度主要呈正相关,气温与土壤湿度主要呈负相关。
Abstract: Based on soil relative humidity data from the Tai’an National Application Meteorology Observation Station and temperature and precipitation data from the national basic meteorological stations during 2015~2024, this study employed Pearson correlation analysis and partial correlation analysis to investigate the correlations and variation characteristics between shallow soil moisture and precipitation/temperature under different seasonal conditions. The results showed that temperature and precipitation exhibited typical monsoon climate characteristics, being higher in summer and lower in winter. Soil moisture demonstrated significant spatial heterogeneity: it peaked in autumn at the Tai’an and Xintai stations, peaked in winter at the Ningyang and Dongping stations, and showed a continuous increasing trend from spring to winter at the Feicheng station. Summer precipitation was the most effective and stable source of soil moisture recharge, showing a significant positive correlation in all regions; the recharge effect of precipitation in spring and autumn, however, exhibited regional differences. Temperature was a primary consumption factor for soil moisture, generally showing an inverse relationship in spring and summer. Low winter temperatures typically corresponded to high soil moisture. The negative effect of temperature in summer and autumn was often masked by precipitation, but after controlling for precipitation, the independent negative influence of temperature became more significant. Overall, precipitation was predominantly positively correlated with soil moisture, while temperature was predominantly negatively correlated.
文章引用:邹潇, 朱霞, 陈洪儒. 泰安浅层土壤湿度与降水和气温的季节关联分析[J]. 林业世界, 2025, 14(4): 565-572. https://doi.org/10.12677/wjf.2025.144067

参考文献

[1] 高贵生, 马扶林, 王明, 等. 青海湖北岸天然草地土壤湿度变化规律及土壤干旱特征分析[J]. 青海草业, 2021, 30(3): 51-56.
[2] 王征. 陕西省土壤湿度时空变化特征及其驱动力分析[J]. 城市勘测, 2023(5): 71-76.
[3] 高琪, 彭杰, 冯春晖, 等. 基于Landsat 8数据的荒漠土壤水分遥感反演[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021, 41(1): 125-131+151.
[4] 杨洋, 林朝晖, 骆利峰. 中国区域夏季地表气温与陆面过程耦合强度的分布特征[J]. 气候与环境研究, 2022, 27(3): 333-350.
[5] Legates, D.R., Mahmood, R., Levia, D.F., DeLiberty, T.L., Quiring, S.M., Houser, C., et al. (2011) Soil Moisture: A Central and Unifying Theme in Physical Geography. Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment, 35, 65-86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] 朱中华, 王雄师, 柳金权. 干旱区中小尺度不同作物地段土壤湿度对气候变化的响应关系研究[J]. 节水灌溉, 2017(8): 6-12.
[7] 刘立文, 段永红, 赵涛. 山西省土壤湿度时空分布及气候因素的耦合[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2020, 20(11): 4250-4255.
[8] 刘川, 余晔, 解晋, 等. 多套土壤温湿度资料在青藏高原的适用性[J]. 高原气象, 2015, 34(3): 653-665.
[9] 程善俊, 管晓丹, 黄建平, 等. 利用GLDAS资料分析黄土高原半干旱区土壤湿度对气候变化的响应[J]. 干旱气象, 2013, 31(4): 641-649.
[10] 白晓英, 马筛艳, 梁奇琛, 等. 咸阳30年土壤湿度变化特征及影响因子分析[J]. 陕西气象, 2024(2): 50-53.
[11] 李勤, 张强, 黄庆忠, 等. 中国气象农业非参数化综合干旱监测及其适用性[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(1): 67-80.
[12] 李博, 张淼, 唐世浩, 等. 基于组网观测的那曲土壤湿度不同时间尺度的变化特征[J]. 气象学报, 2018, 76(6): 1040-1052.
[13] 李若麟, 保鸿燕, 李课臣, 等. 全球土壤湿度的记忆性及其气候效应[J]. 冰川冻土, 2016, 38(6): 1470-1481.
[14] 姜丽霞, 李帅, 纪仰慧, 等. 1980-2005年松嫩平原土壤湿度对气候变化的响应[J]. 应用生态学报, 2009, 20(1): 91-97.
[15] 马柱国, 魏和林, 符淙斌. 中国东部区域土壤湿度的变化及其与气候变率的关系[J]. 气象学报, 2000, 58(3): 278-287.
[16] 庄慧敏, 张朝, 程飞, 等. 1992-2018年中国旱作农田土壤湿度的时空模式及气象驱动因素[J]. 地理学报, 2022, 77(9): 2308-2321.
[17] 符淙斌, 董文杰, 温刚, 等. 全球变化的区域响应和适应[J]. 气象学报, 2003(2): 245-250.
[18] 孙凤华, 杨素英, 陈鹏狮. 东北地区44年的气候暖干化趋势分析及可能影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2005(7): 751-755+762.
[19] Koster, R.D., Dirmeyer, P.A., Guo, Z., Bonan, G., Chan, E., Cox, P., et al. (2004) Regions of Strong Coupling between Soil Moisture and Precipitation. Science, 305, 1138-1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] 梁强, 李传荣, 张锋, 等. 泰安市不同绿地土壤微生物群落结构分析[J]. 山东农业科学, 2017, 49(2): 99-104.
[21] 林泽民. 基于RS和GIS的泰安市土壤侵蚀空间分布格局及防治对策研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 济南: 山东师范大学, 2015.
[22] 杜俊杉, 马英, 胡晓农, 等. 基于双稳定同位素和MixSIAR模型的冬小麦根系吸水来源研究[J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(18): 6611-6622.