干旱胁迫对奇亚籽生理特性的影响
The Effect of Drought Stress on the Physiological Characteristics of Chia Seeds
DOI: 10.12677/hjas.2025.1510152, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 邹原东, 孙玉楠, 武 晋, 徐 琰*:北京农业职业学院园艺园林学院,北京
关键词: 奇亚籽叶绿素MDA可溶性蛋白干旱胁迫Chia Seeds Chlorophyll MDA Soluble Protein Drought Stress
摘要: 以日光温室中栽植的奇亚籽、辣椒和菠菜三种作物为实验材料,在持续干旱条件下,测定叶片的叶绿素、丙二醛(MDA)及可溶性蛋白的含量并分析其中的差异,探究干旱胁迫下奇亚籽的生理响应特征,为耐旱作物筛选及干旱区种植提供理论支撑。结果表明,随着干旱胁迫的持续增加,奇亚籽表现出较高的光合保护性和渗透调节能力。叶绿素含量比菠菜和辣椒分别高出356.52%和585.71%,光合保护机制高效;MDA含量比菠菜低14.8%,比辣椒高0.2%,膜脂过氧化程度轻,膜系统稳定性强;可溶性蛋白含量比辣椒和菠菜分别高出38.5%和12.5%,渗透调节能力突出,表明奇亚籽通过协同生理机制具有更高的抗旱性。
Abstract: In a solar greenhouse, chia seeds, chili peppers, and spinach were used as experimental materials. Under prolonged drought conditions, the contents of chlorophyll, malondialdehyde (MDA), and soluble proteins in leaves were measured and analyzed to explore the physiological responses of chia seeds under drought stress, providing theoretical support for drought-resistant crop screening and cultivation in arid regions. The results showed that as drought stress persisted, chia seeds exhibited higher photoprotective properties and osmotic adjustment capacity. The chlorophyll content in chia seeds was 356.52% and 585.71% higher than that in spinach and chili peppers, respectively, indicating an efficient photosynthetic protection mechanism. The MDA content in chia seeds was 14.8% lower than that in spinach but only 0.2% higher than that in chili peppers, suggesting less membrane lipid peroxidation and stronger membrane system stability. The soluble protein content in chia seeds was 38.5% and 12.5% higher than that in chili peppers and spinach, respectively, highlighting its prominent osmotic adjustment ability. These findings indicate that chia seeds possess higher drought resistance through concerted physiological mechanisms.
文章引用:邹原东, 孙玉楠, 武晋, 徐琰. 干旱胁迫对奇亚籽生理特性的影响[J]. 农业科学, 2025, 15(10): 1217-1222. https://doi.org/10.12677/hjas.2025.1510152

参考文献

[1] 朱广惠, 刘艳华. 植物与植物生理[M]. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 2012.
[2] 闫姝婕, 孔超, 姜乐, 等. 外源脯氨酸对干旱胁迫下番茄幼苗生长发育的影响[J]. 天津农业科学, 2025, 31(6): 51-58.
[3] 李合生. 植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2000.
[4] 李进华, 麦生威, 李冰, 等. 干旱胁迫对翅茎白粉藤光合作用及叶绿体超微结构的影响[J]. 广西林业科学, 2023, 52(6): 707-712.
[5] 张宏芝, 王立红, 时佳, 等. 土壤水分对不同抗旱性春小麦品种叶片保护性酶活性及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(5): 1041-1047.
[6] 乔羽, 赵允格, 高丽倩, 等. 斑块面积对干燥-复水条件下藓类植物生理活性的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2024, 44(5): 2081-2088.
[7] 王芳, 彭云玲, 方永丰, 等. 花后干旱胁迫对不同持绿型玉米叶片衰老的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2018, 38(4): 60-66.
[8] 吴梅, 张边江, 陈全战, 等. C4高效光合基因在C3植物中的应用研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2010, 26(3): 68-71.
[9] 靳红磊, 明宇, 王宏斌. 阴生和阳生植物在光合结构及功能中的差异概述[J]. 中山大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 60(6): 1-8.
[10] 陈默, 陈璐, 黄晓雅, 等. PEG模拟干旱胁迫下苗期木薯的生长生理响应[J]. 云南农业大学学报(自然科学), 2024, 39(4): 15-22.
[11] 麦格皮热提古丽·达吾提, 王海鸥, 陈晓楠, 等. 干旱胁迫下丛枝菌根真菌对疏叶骆驼刺和多枝柽柳生长及生理的影响[J]. 西北植物学报, 2023, 43(11): 1897-1909.
[12] 曹梦琳, 赵智勇, 毕红园, 等. 不同小麦种质苗期抗旱性筛选[J]. 农业与技术, 2024, 44(17): 5-10.
[13] 姜岩岩, 徐晓飞, 郝桂杰. 夜间低温对栽培和野生番茄果实抗逆性的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2012, 27(6): 97-101.
[14] 金思雨, 彭祚登, 张舒乐. 同程度干旱胁迫和复水处理对刺槐苗木生理指标的影响[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2024, 52(10): 27-39.
[15] 刘江, 李明倩, 常峻菲, 等. 干旱胁迫及复水对大豆关键生育时期叶片生理特性的影响[J]. 中国农业气象, 2022, 43(8): 622-632.