基于多源遥感数据的海南岛总初级生产力时空变化
Spatiotemporal Variation of Gross Primary Productivity in Hainan Island Based on Multi-Source Remote Sensing Data
DOI: 10.12677/gser.2025.145100, PDF,   
作者: 李瑞娟*, 焦 悦, 邢益航:海南大学生态学院,海南 海口;廖玮杰, 吴玉容:龙岩市烟草公司永定分公司,福建 龙岩;尚 明:河北工程大学地球科学与工程学院,河北 邯郸;施晨晓:海南省气象信息中心,海南省南海气象防灾减灾重点实验室,海南 海口;白 磊#:海南大学生态学院,海南 海口;海南智慧低空气象大数据研究中心,海南 海口
关键词: 碳循环热带森林季节变化生态监测植被动态Carbon Cycle Tropical Forest Seasonal Variation Ecological Monitoring Vegetation Dynamics
摘要: 海南岛是我国最大的热带岛屿,也是全球生物多样性保护的热点地区之一。准确估算热带岛屿生态系统的总初级生产力(GPP)对理解全球碳循环至关重要,但目前仍存在较大不确定性。本研究集成GLASSMOD17、FLUXCOMVODCA2、VPM和改进的EC-LUE六种遥感GPP产品,系统评估了2001~2015年海南岛GPP的时空变化特征及其驱动机制。通过统一的时空预处理和多维度分析方法,发现海南岛GPP呈现显著的“核心–边缘”空间格局,中部热带雨林区域年均GPP达2829.78 gC m2 yr1,较全岛均值(1659~2138 gC m2 yr1)高32.6%,且年增长率最高达45 gC m2 yr2 (p < 0.05)。GPP空间分布具有显著的南北分异,以19˚N为界(R2 = 0.73),北部区域GPP年际波动剧烈(标准差 > 300 gC m2 yr1),南部区域较为稳定(标准差 < 120 gC m2 yr1)。东北部城市化地区GPP呈现显著负增长(−30至−45 gC m2 yr2)。不同遥感产品在估算值上存在系统性差异(范围479 gC m2 yr1),光能利用率模型在雨季高估约15%,机器学习模型在旱季低估9.8%,主要受热带多云环境影响(云覆盖率75.44%)。融合微波与光学数据可降低估算误差12%~15%,为改善热带岛屿碳循环监测提供了新思路。
Abstract: Hainan Island, the largest tropical island in China, is a critical region for biodiversity conservation and a global hotspot for understanding ecological dynamics. Accurately estimating the Gross Primary Productivity (GPP) of tropical island ecosystems is fundamental to comprehending the global carbon cycle and its implications for climate change. However, substantial uncertainties persist in the current estimation methods, especially in regions characterized by complex tropical environments. This study integrates six remote sensing-based GPP products, namely GLASS, MOD17, FLUXCOM, VODCA2, VPM, and an improved EC-LUE model, to systematically evaluate the spatiotemporal variations of GPP across Hainan Island from 2001 to 2015. The study also investigates the underlying driving mechanisms of these variations. A unified spatiotemporal preprocessing approach was applied to harmonize the data from different remote sensing products, followed by multidimensional analytical methods to analyze the variations in GPP across the island. The results reveal a distinct “core-periphery” spatial pattern of GPP across Hainan Island, with the central tropical rainforest region exhibiting the highest GPP values. Specifically, the annual average GPP of the central tropical rainforest reached 2829.78 gC m2 yr1, which was 32.6% higher than the island-wide average GPP range (1659~2138 gC m2 yr1). The central area also exhibited the highest annual GPP growth rate of 45 gC m2 yr2, which was statistically significant (p < 0.05). These findings highlight the central region’s potential as a carbon sink within the tropical island ecosystem. Additionally, the study found a pronounced spatial differentiation in GPP between the northern and southern regions of the island, with 19˚N latitude serving as a boundary. This division was statistically significant, with an R2 value of 0.73. The northern region showed greater interannual variability in GPP, with standard deviations greater than 300 gC m2 yr1, indicating more fluctuating carbon dynamics. In contrast, the southern region demonstrated a more stable GPP pattern with a lower standard deviation of less than 120 gC m2 yr1. This finding suggests that the southern part of Hainan Island may have more consistent carbon flux, possibly due to its tropical rainforest characteristics. In terms of urbanization impact, the northeastern region, which has undergone substantial urban development, experienced a significant negative GPP growth rate ranging from −30 to −45 gC m2 yr2. This indicates that urbanization and land-use changes in this area have contributed to a decrease in the island’s overall carbon productivity. The loss of vegetation cover and the associated decline in GPP underscore the need for sustainable urban planning and land management strategies to mitigate further carbon losses in this region. The study also highlighted systematic differences in the GPP estimates derived from different remote sensing products, with the variation spanning a range of 479 gC m2 yr1. The Light Use Efficiency (LUE) model was found to overestimate GPP by approximately 15% during the rainy season, while machine learning models tended to underestimate GPP by 9.8% during the dry season. These discrepancies were mainly attributed to the tropical cloud cover, which has an average coverage rate of 75.44%. The study suggests that integrating microwave and optical data can reduce estimation errors by 12~15%, offering a more accurate method for monitoring GPP in tropical island ecosystems.
文章引用:李瑞娟, 廖玮杰, 吴玉容, 焦悦, 邢益航, 尚明, 施晨晓, 白磊. 基于多源遥感数据的海南岛总初级生产力时空变化[J]. 地理科学研究, 2025, 14(5): 1035-1049. https://doi.org/10.12677/gser.2025.145100

参考文献

[1] Zhang, Y. and Ye, A. (2021) Would the Obtainable Gross Primary Productivity (GPP) Products Stand up? A Critical Assessment of 45 Global GPP Products. Science of The Total Environment, 783, Article 146965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] 方精云, 柯金虎, 唐志尧, 等. 生物生产力的“4P”概念、估算及其相互关系[J]. 植物生态学报, 2001, 25(4): 414-419.
[3] Li, X., Liang, S., Yu, G., Yuan, W., Cheng, X., Xia, J., et al. (2013) Estimation of Gross Primary Production over the Terrestrial Ecosystems in China. Ecological Modelling, 261, 80-92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Paulay, G. (1994) Biodiversity on Oceanic Islands: Its Origin and Extinction. American Zoologist, 34, 134-144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] 池源, 石洪华, 王晓丽, 等. 庙岛群岛南五岛生态系统净初级生产力空间分布及其影响因子[J]. 生态学报, 2015, 35(24): 8094-8106.
[6] 石洪华, 郑伟, 丁德文, 等. 典型海岛生态系统服务及价值评估[J]. 海洋环境科学, 2009, 28(6): 743-748.
[7] 符传博, 丹利, 佟金鹤, 等. 海南岛臭氧污染时空变化及敏感性特征[J]. 环境科学, 2023, 44(9): 4799-4808.
[8] Corlett, R.T. (2016) The Impacts of Droughts in Tropical Forests. Trends in Plant Science, 21, 584-593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Kothandaraman, S., Dar, J.A., Sundarapandian, S., Dayanandan, S. and Khan, M.L. (2020) Ecosystem-Level Carbon Storage and Its Links to Diversity, Structural and Environmental Drivers in Tropical Forests of Western Ghats, India. Scientific Reports, 10, Article No. 13444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Ren, H., Li, L., Liu, Q., Wang, X., Li, Y., Hui, D., et al. (2014) Spatial and Temporal Patterns of Carbon Storage in Forest Ecosystems on Hainan Island, Southern China. PLOS ONE, 9, e108163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Wu, L., Guo, E., An, Y., Xiong, Q., Shi, X., Zhang, X., et al. (2023) Evaluating the Losses and Recovery of GPP in the Subtropical Mangrove Forest Directly Attacked by Tropical Cyclone: Case Study in Hainan Island. Remote Sensing, 15, Article 2094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] 侯静惟, 方伟华, 程锰, 等. 基于Copula函数的海南热带气旋风雨联合概率特征分析[J]. 自然灾害学报, 2019, 28(3): 54-64.
[13] 王晓丽, 王嫒, 石洪华, 等. 海岛陆地生态系统固碳估算方法[J]. 生态学报, 2014, 34(1): 88-96.
[14] Ren, H., Chen, H., Li, L., Li, P., Hou, C., Wan, H., et al. (2013) Spatial and Temporal Patterns of Carbon Storage from 1992 to 2002 in Forest Ecosystems in Guangdong, Southern China. Plant and Soil, 363, 123-138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] 王克清, 王鹤松, 孙建新. 遥感GPP模型在中国地区多站点的应用与比较[J]. 植物生态学报, 2017, 41(3): 337-347.
[16] Costa, G.B., Mendes, K.R., Viana, L.B., Almeida, G.V., Mutti, P.R., e Silva, C.M.S., et al. (2022) Seasonal Ecosystem Productivity in a Seasonally Dry Tropical Forest (Caatinga) Using Flux Tower Measurements and Remote Sensing Data. Remote Sensing, 14, Article 3955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Maselli, F., Papale, D., Puletti, N., Chirici, G. and Corona, P. (2009) Combining Remote Sensing and Ancillary Data to Monitor the Gross Productivity of Water-Limited Forest Ecosystems. Remote Sensing of Environment, 113, 657-667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] Sri Rahayu Romadhoni, L., As-syakur, A.R., Hidayah, Z., Budi Wiyanto, D., Safitri, R., Yusuf Satriyana Utama, R., et al. (2022) Annual Characteristics of Gross Primary Productivity (GPP) in Mangrove Forest during 2016-2020 as Revealed by Sentinel-2 Remote Sensing Imagery. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1016, Article 012051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] Kanniah, K.D., Kang, C.S., Sharma, S. and Amir, A.A. (2021) Remote Sensing to Study Mangrove Fragmentation and Its Impacts on Leaf Area Index and Gross Primary Productivity in the South of Peninsular Malaysia. Remote Sensing, 13, Article 1427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] Deng, M., Meng, X., Lu, Y., Li, Z., Zhao, L., Niu, H., et al. (2022) The Response of Vegetation to Regional Climate Change on the Qinghai-Xizang Plateau Based on Remote Sensing Products and the Dynamic Global Vegetation Model. Remote Sensing, 14, Article 3337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] 安映荷, 张润卿, 刘文杰, 等. 海南岛橡胶林区域不同SIF产品的差异性分析及其对GPP估算的影响[J]. 热带生物学报, 2023, 14(4): 412-423.
[22] Houghton, R.A. (2005) Aboveground Forest Biomass and the Global Carbon Balance. Global Change Biology, 11, 945-958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[23] 高述超, 陈毅青, 陈宗铸, 等. 海南岛森林生态系统碳储量及其空间分布特征[J]. 生态学报, 2023, 43(9): 3558-3570.
[24] 宾昕, 蒋贤玲, 任晓玥. 近51年海南岛极端气温事件分析[J]. 热带气象学报, 2023, 39(3): 424-432.
[25] 雷金睿, 陈宗铸, 陈毅青, 等. 海南省湿地生态系统健康评价体系构建与应用[J]. 湿地科学, 2020, 18(5): 555-563.
[26] 刘强, 杨众养, 陈毅青, 等. 基于CA-Markov多情景模拟的海南岛土地利用变化及其生态环境效应[J]. 生态环境学报, 2021, 30(7): 1522-1531.
[27] Teubner, I.E., Forkel, M., Wild, B., Mösinger, L. and Dorigo, W. (2021) Impact of Temperature and Water Availability on Microwave-Derived Gross Primary Production. Biogeosciences, 18, 3285-3308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[28] Zhang, Y., Xiao, X., Wu, X., Zhou, S., Zhang, G., Qin, Y., et al. (2017) A Global Moderate Resolution Dataset of Gross Primary Production of Vegetation for 2000-2016. Scientific Data, 4, Article No. 170165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[29] Zheng, Y., Shen, R., Wang, Y., Li, X., Liu, S., Liang, S., et al. (2020) Improved Estimate of Global Gross Primary Production for Reproducing Its Long-Term Variation, 1982-2017. Earth System Science Data, 12, 2725-2746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[30] 赵宝山, 严程明, 苏俊波, 等. 1960-2020年海南岛气温、降水及参考作物蒸散量变化趋势[J]. 节水灌溉, 2023(10): 83-90.
[31] 张春花, 董立就, 吴俞, 等. 海南岛中部山地地形对天气气候的影响[J]. 气象科技进展, 2020, 10(4): 70-73.
[32] Wang, W., Wu, Y., Wang, S., Yin, H., Li, W. and Zhao, S. (2022) Seasonal Variations of Ecosystem Water Use Efficiency and Their Responses to Climate Factors in Inner Mongolia of China. Atmosphere, 13, Article 2085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[33] Green, J.K., Berry, J., Ciais, P., Zhang, Y. and Gentine, P. (2020) Amazon Rainforest Photosynthesis Increases in Response to Atmospheric Dryness. Science Advances, 6, eabb7232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[34] 牛忠恩, 闫慧敏, 陈静清, 等. 基于VPM与MOD17产品的中国农田生态系统总初级生产力估算比较[J]. 农业工程学报, 2016, 32(4): 191-198.
[35] 陈静清, 闫慧敏, 王绍强, 等. 中国陆地生态系统总初级生产力VPM遥感模型估算[J]. 第四纪研究, 2014, 34(4): 732-742.
[36] Yuan, W., Liu, S., Dong, W., Liang, S., Zhao, S., Chen, J., et al. (2014) Differentiating Moss from Higher Plants Is Critical in Studying the Carbon Cycle of the Boreal Biome. Nature Communications, 5, Article No. 4270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[37] Jung, M., Schwalm, C., Migliavacca, M., Walther, S., Camps-Valls, G., Koirala, S., et al. (2020) Scaling Carbon Fluxes from Eddy Covariance Sites to Globe: Synthesis and Evaluation of the FLUXCOM Approach. Biogeosciences, 17, 1343-1365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[38] 雷济舟, 崔嵬, 朱济帅, 等. 海南岛近20年GPP变化格局及驱动因素分析[J]. 热带生物学报, 2024, 15(1): 42-51.
[39] Han, N., Hu, K., Yu, M., Jia, P. and Zhang, Y. (2022) Incorporating Ecological Constraints into the Simulations of Tropical Urban Growth Boundaries: A Case Study of Sanya City on Hainan Island, China. Applied Sciences, 12, Article 6409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[40] 王宁, 田家, 田庆久. 基于MODIS日地表反射率产品的长时序日分辨率EVI重建方法[J]. 遥感学报, 2024, 28(4): 969-980.