基于OBE-CDIO模式的应用型高校新质人才培养——以金属材料工程专业为例
Cultivating Quality Talent in Chinese Application-Oriented Universities Based on the OBE-CDIO Model—A Case Study of Metal Materials Engineering Major
摘要: 应用型高校在培养适应新质生产力发展需求的高素质工程技术人才方面面临挑战,金属材料工程专业传统人才培养模式存在目标导向模糊、课程体系滞后、产教融合不足及评价机制单一,导致人才培养与产业需求脱节。针对这些问题,提出基于OBE教育理念与CDIO教育模式融合的新型人才培养模式。OBE-CDIO模式以产业需求为起点,反向设计培养目标,构建“基础–专业–综合–创新”四层次课程体系,并通过四级CDIO项目链贯穿教学全过程,强化工程实践能力。具体实施路径包括:重构课程内容,融入材料基因工程、智能设计等前沿技术;深化校企协同,共建产业学院与“双导师”;建立“三维四主体”动态评价体系,引入企业认证考核与毕业生追踪反馈。OBE-CDIO模式通过目标导向与工程实践的深度融合,有效解决了应用型高校人才培养与产业需求的结构性矛盾,为工程教育改革提供了可推广的范式,对支撑新质生产力发展具有重要意义。
Abstract: Application-oriented universities face challenges in cultivating high-quality engineering technical talents that meet the development needs of new quality productivity. Traditional talent cultivation models in Metal Materials Engineering Major suffer from ambiguous objective orientation, outdated curriculum systems, insufficient integration of industry and education, and a singular evaluation mechanism, leading to a disconnection between talent development and industry demands. To address these issues, this study proposes a new talent cultivation model integrating the OBE educational concept with the CDIO educational framework. The OBE-CDIO model takes industrial needs as its starting point, reverse-designs training objectives, and constructs a four-tier curriculum system encompassing “foundational-professional-comprehensive-innovative” components. It reinforces engineering practical capabilities through a four-level CDIO project chain that runs through the entire teaching process. Specific implementation measures include: restructuring course content to incorporate cutting-edge technologies such as Materials Genome Engineering and intelligent design; deepening industry-university collaboration through co-established industrial colleges and a “dual-tutor” system; and establishing a dynamic “three-dimensional, four-stakeholder” evaluation system that introduces enterprise certification assessments and graduate tracking feedback. By deeply integrating objective orientation with engineering practice, the OBE-CDIO model effectively resolves the structural disconnections between talent cultivation and industrial needs in application-oriented universities. It provides a replicable paradigm for engineering education reform and holds significant importance for supporting the development of new quality productivity.
文章引用:伊家飞, 卿培林, 孙敬会, 何兵, 张旭明, 崔长闯, 李维俊, 薛斐, 李德贵, 杨志成. 基于OBE-CDIO模式的应用型高校新质人才培养——以金属材料工程专业为例[J]. 教育进展, 2025, 15(10): 1045-1052.
https://doi.org/10.12677/ae.2025.15101935
参考文献
|
[1]
|
杨鑫婕, 黄梦佳. 应用型高校助力新质生产力高质量发展探究[J]. 科技资讯, 2025, 23(3): 12-14.
|
|
[2]
|
杨青胜, 詹习生, 华晖. “双主体、三融合、四融通”新工科应用型人才培养探索与实践——以地方高校自动化类专业为例[J]. 湖北师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2025, 45(1): 115-118.
|
|
[3]
|
荆微微, 高太光, 洪亮. 应用型新质管理人才四维融合培养研究[J]. 理论观察, 2025(1): 144-148.
|
|
[4]
|
林于良, 梅平平. 应用型高校拔尖创新人才培养的价值意蕴、现实困境与实践进路[J]. 江苏高教, 2024(9): 80-85.
|
|
[5]
|
丁兆国. 产教融合背景下应用型高校新工科人才培养的思考[J]. 装备制造技术, 2020(11): 150-152.
|
|
[6]
|
翟娟娟. 新质生产力视角下高等教育人才培养模式创新研究[J]. 质量与市场, 2025(1): 114-116.
|
|
[7]
|
张丽娟, 葛运旺, 王新武. 深化产教融合的本科人才培养研究与实践[J]. 实验技术与管理, 2020, 37(7): 169-172.
|
|
[8]
|
高宇超, 何立平. 新质生产力驱动下地方应用型高校学科建设的动力、原则、挑战与路径[J]. 教育观察, 2024, 13(28): 13-15.
|
|
[9]
|
黄洁. 应用型高校人才培养质量提升困境与策略[J]. 四川劳动保障, 2025(5): 108-109.
|
|
[10]
|
汪思齐. 新时代背景下地方行业特色高校特色学科融合人才培养创新模式研究[J]. 湖北中医杂志, 2025, 47(3): 60-62.
|
|
[11]
|
罗军明, 刘光明. 金属材料工程国家一流专业人才培养体系构建与探索[J]. 南昌航空大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 38(4): 128-133.
|
|
[12]
|
张洪亮, 刘腾, 满田囡, 等. 金属材料工程专业人才培养模式探索与实践[J]. 中国现代教育装备, 2024(7): 137-139, 143.
|
|
[13]
|
廖春艳. 基于OBE理念的应用型高校金融学专业人才培养模式研究[J]. 湖北经济学院学报(人文社会科学版), 2025, 22(3): 134-137.
|
|
[14]
|
程海梅, 陆丹丹, 陈思源. 高校工程管理专业CDIO人才培养模式与改革实施[J]. 科学咨询, 2019(1): 12-13.
|
|
[15]
|
杜晓岚, 张磊. 基于OBE-CDIO理念的高职课程改革探究与实践[J]. 科技风, 2025(3): 16-18.
|