新文科视域下美国文学课程的跨学科素养培育路径
Cultivation Pathways for Interdisciplinary Literacy in American Literature Course from the Perspective of New Liberal Arts
DOI: 10.12677/ass.2025.1410919, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 杨春芳, 马文瑞：三峡大学外国语学院，湖北 宜昌
关键词: 新文科；美国文学课程；跨学科素养；培育路径；New Liberal Arts； American Literature Course； Interdisciplinary Literacy； Cultivation Pathways
摘要: 美国文学课程的跨学科素养培育路径具有多元性和动态性。一方面，文学经典的多学科交叉性、学生认知特点及兴趣偏好的差异性，教师跨学科意识及跨学科教学能力的多元性等多重因素形成合力，共同促成培育路径之多元性。另一方面，学生的最近发展区具有动态性，这就要求教师动态调整跨学科培育路径。鉴于此，在美国文学教学实践中，我们以跨学科素养培育为导向重构教学目标、组合创新教学模式，跨越学科藩篱，促进文学与其他学科的交叉、融合和对话，提升学生的跨学科素养。
Abstract: The pathways to cultivating interdisciplinary literacy in American literature course are inherently plural and dynamic. On one hand, multiple factors work in concert to foster this diversity, including the multidisciplinary intersections inherent in literary texts, the varying cognitive traits, interests and preferences among students, as well as the diversity in teachers’ interdisciplinary awareness and teaching capabilities. On the other hand, the dynamic nature of students’ zones of proximal development necessitates that teachers dynamically adjust the interdisciplinary cultivation pathways. In light of this, in the teaching practice of American literature, we reconstruct teaching objectives and combine and innovate teaching models with the cultivation of interdisciplinary literacy as the guiding orientation. We transcend disciplinary boundaries, promote the intersection, integration, and dialogue between literature and other disciplines, thereby enhancing students’ interdisciplinary literacy.
文章引用：杨春芳, 马文瑞. 新文科视域下美国文学课程的跨学科素养培育路径 [J]. 社会科学前沿, 2025, 14(10): 481-487. https://doi.org/10.12677/ass.2025.1410919

参考文献

[1] 杨灿明. 新文科建设的“七个维度” [J]. 社会科学文摘, 2021(7): 22-24.
[2] 杜文彬. 融入学科教学的跨学科素养评价: 内涵、实施与启示——以加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省为例[J]. 外国教育研究, 2023, 50(4): 3-18.
[3] Kachalov, N., Kornienko, A., Kvesko, R., Kornienko, A., Kvesko, S. and Chaplinskaya, Y. (2015) Interdisciplinary Competences and Their Status Role in the System of Higher Professional Education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 206, 429-433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[4] Fortuin, K.P.J., van Koppen, C.S.A. and Kroeze, C. (2013) The Contribution of Systems Analysis to Training Students in Cognitive Interdisciplinary Skills in Environmental Science Education. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 3, 139-152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[5] Mansilla, V.B. (2017) Interdisciplinary Learning. In: Frodeman, R., et al., Eds., The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity, Oxford University Press, 261-275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[6] Repko, A.F, Szostak, R. and Buchberger, M.P. (2017) Introduction to Interdisciplinary Studies. 2nd Edition, Sage Publications, Inc., 177.
[7] Klein, J.T. (2017) Typologies of Interdisciplinarity. In: Frodeman, R., et al., Eds., The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity, Oxford University Press, 21-34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[8] 宋歌, 王祖浩. 国际科学教育中的跨学科素养: 背景、定位与研究进展[J]. 全球教育展望, 2019, 48(10): 28-43.
[9] (英)乔·莫兰. 跨学科: 人文学科的诞生、危机与未来[M]. 陈后亮, 宁艺阳, 译. 南京: 南京大学出版社, 2023: 17-25.
[10] (美)罗伯特·马扎诺. 目标教学法[M]. 王晔, 译. 北京: 中国青年出版社, 2024.
[11] (美)科马克·麦卡锡. 天下骏马[M]. 尚玉明, 魏铁汉, 译. 重庆: 重庆出版社, 2009: 2.
[12] (法)高宣扬. 存在主义[M]. 上海: 上海交通大学出版社, 2016: 5-6.
[13] Posner, R.A. (2009) Law and Literature. 3rd Edition, Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[14] Elizabeth, S.A. and Meyler, B. (2017) New Directions in Law and Literature. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[15] Dolin, K. (1999) Fiction and the Law. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[16] Dolin, K. (2007) A Critical Introduction to Law and Literature. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[17] Ward, I. (1995) Law and Literature. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[18] 余宗其. 外国文学与外国法律[M]. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 2003: 13-14.
[19] 余宗其. 法律文艺学[M]. 北京: 中国财富出版社, 2014: 264.
[20] 布鲁斯·乔伊斯, 等. 教学模式[M]. 第8版. 兰英, 等, 译. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2014: 1.

为你推荐