淮北市城郊区浅层地下水水岩作用及水环境质量评价
Water Rock Interaction and Water Environment Quality Evaluation of Shallow Groundwater in Suburban Areas of Huaibei City
DOI: 10.12677/gser.2025.145106, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 李浩然, 马 杰*, 吴祥睿, 刘向红, 闵 宁, 张子鹏, 薛恩平, 张家俊:宿州学院资源与土木工程学院,安徽 宿州;杨 洋:安徽省煤田地质局第一勘探队,安徽 淮南
关键词: 水岩作用水化学特征离子来源水质评价Water Rock Interaction Hydrochemical Characteristics Ion Source Water Quality Assessment
摘要: 为进一步了解皖北地区浅层地下水水岩作用及水环境质量,本文在安徽省淮北市城郊区采集了43件浅层地下水样品,基于Piper图、Gibbs图,离子比例系数和WQI饮用水评价等方法,对研究区内浅层地下水水岩作用、水化学特征和饮用水质量进行评价和分析。结果表明:浅层地下水pH值变化范围为6.97~8.19,平均值为7.37,属于弱碱性水。TDS值范围为222.00~842.00 mg/L,平均值为421.3 mg/L,为淡水。水化学类型主要以HCO3-Ca·Mg型为主。浅层地下水常规水化学组分与盐岩矿物、硫酸盐岩矿物、硅酸盐岩矿物的风化溶解作用和阳离子交替吸附作用有关。WQI的变化范围为20.00~71.13,平均值为36.53,表明浅层地下水水质良好,适宜居民饮用。
Abstract: In order to understand the hydrochemical processes and water environment quality of shallow groundwater in Huaibei City, Northern Anhui Province, forty-three groundwater samples were collected in the suburban area of Huaibei City. Based on the methods of Piper plot, Gibbs plot, ion ratio, and WQI, the hydrochemical characteristics and drinking water quality were evaluated and analyzed. The results indicate that the pH value ranges from 6.97 to 8.19, with an average of 7.37, indicating the samples are weak alkaline. The TDS value ranges from 222.00 to 842.00 mg/L, with an average of 421.30 mg/L, indicating these samples belong to the fresh water. The hydrochemical type of shallow groundwater is mainly HCO3-Ca·Mg type. The main chemical components of shallow groundwater are related to the weathering and dissolution of salt rock minerals, sulfate rock minerals, and silicate rock minerals, as well as the cation alternating adsorption. The variation range of WQI is from 20.00 to 71.13, with an average value of 36.53, indicating that the shallow groundwater quality is good and suitable for residents to drink.
文章引用:李浩然, 马杰, 杨洋, 吴祥睿, 刘向红, 闵宁, 张子鹏, 薛恩平, 张家俊. 淮北市城郊区浅层地下水水岩作用及水环境质量评价[J]. 地理科学研究, 2025, 14(5): 1110-1118. https://doi.org/10.12677/gser.2025.145106

参考文献

[1] 张传奇, 王晓曦, 陈曦. 莱州湾东岸地下水化学特征及水质评价[J]. 环境保护与循环经济, 2020, 40(4): 56-61.
[2] 英爱文. 地下水监测与评价[J]. 水文, 2006(3): 63-66.
[3] 袁政莲, 马杰, 颜晓龙, 等. 典型乡镇地下水水化学特征及离子来源多元统计分析——以皖北解集乡为例[J]. 科技视界, 2021(14): 141-143.
[4] 费中良, 鲍微. 淮北市应急水源地地下水资源评价[J]. 西部资源, 2019(4): 86-88.
[5] 许金昭. 淮北平原松散层地下水环境水文地球化学特征[D]: [博士学位论文]. 合肥: 中国科学技术大学, 2024.
[6] 陈星, 郑刘根, 姜春露, 等. 安徽淮北临涣矿区地表水水化学及硫氢氧同位素组成特征[J]. 地球与环境, 2019, 47(2): 177-185.
[7] 颜晓龙, 马杰, 张玉洁, 等. 皖北地区浅层地下水水化学特征及水质评价——以宿州市某乡镇为例[J]. 河南科技, 2022, 41(6): 111-116.
[8] 武文静, 冯松宝, 余浩, 等. 淮北平原区农田地下水水化学特征影响因素及水质评价[J]. 能源与环境, 2025(2): 138-142.
[9] 黄望望, 姜春露, 陈星, 等. 淮南新集矿区主要充水含水层水化学特征及成因[J]. 地球与环境, 2020, 48(4): 432-442.
[10] 郝启勇, 徐晓天, 张心彬, 等. 鲁西北阳谷地区浅层高氟地下水化学特征及成因[J]. 地球科学与环境学报, 2020, 42(5): 668-677.
[11] 刘海, 宋阳, 李迎春, 等. 长江流域安庆段浅层地下水水化学特征及控制因素[J]. 环境科学, 2024, 45(3): 1525-1538.
[12] 侯庆秋, 董少刚, 张旻玮. 内蒙古四子王旗浅层地下水水化学特征及其成因[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2020, 34(4): 116-121.
[13] 唐起, 李晓, 王维, 等. 四川盆地中下三叠统盐卤水水化学成分相关性分析[J]. 人民珠江, 2017, 38(4): 70-73.
[14] Sunitha, V. and Reddy, B.M. (2022) Geochemical Characterization, Deciphering Groundwater Quality Using Pollution Index of Groundwater (PIG), Water Quality Index (WQI) and Geographical Information System (GIS) in Hard Rock Aquifer, South India. Applied Water Science, 12, Article No. 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef