《民法典》第533条情势变更原则的适用边界研究——以与商业风险的区分为核心
Study on the Application Boundary of the Principle of Change of Circumstances under Article 533 of the Civil Code—Focusing on the Distinction from Commercial Risks
DOI: 10.12677/ds.2025.1110323, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 马 萍:新疆师范大学政法学院,新疆 乌鲁木齐;苏 浩:新疆乌鲁木齐市米东区人民检察院,新疆 乌鲁木齐
关键词: 情势变更商业风险适用边界《民法典》第533条合同严守Change of Circumstances Commercial Risks Application Boundary Article 533 of the Civil Code Strict Contract Observance
摘要: 《民法典》第533条正式确立了情势变更原则,为合同成立后因客观情况发生重大变化而陷入履行困境的当事人提供了司法救济路径。然而,该原则在司法实践中的适用始终存在与商业风险难以清晰区分的困境。过度适用会损害合同严守的基石,动摇交易安全;适用不足则无法实现实质公平,有悖于该制度的初衷。因此,精准界定情势变更原则的适用边界,核心在于构建一套可操作的、能与商业风险进行有效区分的标准体系。本文以“与商业风险的区分”为核心,旨在系统研究情势变更原则的适用边界。
Abstract: Article 533 of the Civil Code formally establishes the principle of change of circumstances, providing a judicial remedy for parties who fall into performance difficulties due to significant changes in objective circumstances after the conclusion of a contract. However, in judicial practice, the application of this principle has always faced the dilemma of being difficult to clearly distinguish from commercial risks. Excessive application will undermine the cornerstone of strict contract observance and shake the security of transactions; insufficient application, on the other hand, will fail to achieve substantive fairness and run counter to the original intention of this system. Therefore, the core of accurately defining the application boundary of the change of circumstances principle lies in constructing an operable standard system that can effectively distinguish it from commercial risks. Focusing on the “distinction from commercial risks”, this paper aims to systematically study the application boundary of the change of circumstances principle.
文章引用:马萍, 苏浩. 《民法典》第533条情势变更原则的适用边界研究——以与商业风险的区分为核心[J]. 争议解决, 2025, 11(10): 185-190. https://doi.org/10.12677/ds.2025.1110323

参考文献

[1] 王利明. 情事变更制度若干问题探讨——兼评《民法典合同编(草案)》(二审稿)第323条[J]. 法商研究, 2019, 36(3): 3-10.
[2] 易军. 民法公平原则新诠[J]. 法学家, 2012(4): 54-73+177-178.
[3] 徐涤宇, 张家勇. 《中华人民共和国民法典》评注[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2022.
[4] 曹守晔. 最高人民法院《关于适用〈中华人民共和国合同法〉若干问题的解释(二)》之情势变更问题的理解与适用[J]. 法律适用, 2009(8): 44-49.
[5] 刘承韪. 论违约方解除合同规则写入民法典之必要与可行[J]. 中国政法大学学报, 2020(3): 37-46+206-207.
[6] 刘凯湘, 张海峡. 论不可抗力[J]. 法学研究, 2000(6): 107-118.
[7] 王利明. 民法总则研究[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2012.
[8] 石佳友, 高郦梅. 违约方申请解除合同权: 争议与回应[J]. 比较法研究, 2019(6): 36-52.
[9] 王轶. 新冠肺炎疫情、不可抗力与情势变更[J]. 法学, 2020(3): 36-48.
[10] 韩世远. 情事变更若干问题研究[J]. 中外法学, 2014, 26(3): 657-675.