“V + 他/个 + NumP”结构中“他”和“个”的句法分析
A Syntactic Analysis of Ta and Ge in the “V + Ta/Ge + NumP” Construction
摘要: 本文在最简方案的框架下,对“V + 他/个 + NumP”结构进行句法–语用接口研究。研究发现,“他”和“个”作为语法化成分,在非正式语体中具有双重语用功能,即表示主观量,又传递情感态度。通过句法操作分析表明,二者虽均需与数量短语初次合并,但合并的位置与方式不同。“个”作为附加语与NumP合并,不触发投射,合并后的成分仍是数量短语,而“他”被定义为轻代词,从基础位置“D”移位至轻代词“d”的位置后投射为dP,最后再与动词结合生成vP语段。这一发现验证了特殊结构的语用功能如情感表达可通过特定句法结构实现,深化了对汉语句法–语用映射关系的认识。
Abstract: Taking the Minimalist Program as its theoretical framework, this paper conducts a syntactic-pragmatic interface study of the “V + ta/ge + NumP” construction. The research finds that ta and ge, which belong to the domain of pragmatic elements, function to denote subjective quantity and express attitudes and emotions. Syntactically, they both take quantity expressions as their target at the stage of first Merge, but their place and manner of Merge are not the same. Specifically, ge functions as an adjunct merging with NumP without triggering projection, leaving the merged constituent still a numeral phrase. In contrast, ta is defined as a light pronoun, moving from its base position “D” to the light pronoun “d” position, projecting as a dP before finally combining with the verb to form a vP phase. This finding confirms that pragmatic functions, such as emotional expression in special constructions, can be realized through specific syntactic structures.
文章引用:吴熹. “V + 他/个 + NumP”结构中“他”和“个”的句法分析[J]. 现代语言学, 2025, 13(10): 531-541. https://doi.org/10.12677/ml.2025.13101089

参考文献

[1] 赵元任. 汉语口语语法[M]. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1979.
[2] 朱德熙. 语法讲义[M]. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1982.
[3] 吕叔湘. 近代汉语指代词[M]. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1985.
[4] 张言军. 虚指代词“他”的语用功能分析[J]. 信阳师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版), 2011, 31(1): 99-102.
[5] 陈宗利, 周静娜. 语用成分的句法分析——“V它/个数量”结构中的“它”和“个” [J]. 外国语(上海外国语大学学报), 2025, 48(3): 46-55.
[6] 熊仲儒. 虚指宾语的句法地位[J]. 汉语学习, 2013(5): 13-21.
[7] 张攀. 虚指“他”的形成机制[D]: [博士学位论文]. 成都: 四川大学, 2021.
[8] 钟梅. “他”作为虚指代词的语用功能及其语用限制性[C]//北京大学对外汉语教育学院. 第八届北京地区对外汉语教学研究生论坛文集下. 成都: 四川师范大学文学院, 2015: 185-192.
[9] 黄伯荣, 廖序东. 现代汉语(增订三版) [M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2003.
[10] 王晓凌. 说带虚指“他”的双及物式[J]. 语言教学与研究, 2008(3): 12-19.
[11] 熊学亮, 杨子. “V + NP + NP”结构的语用分析[J]. 外语与外语教学, 2008(6): 1-3.
[12] 张庆文. “V +个+ XP”结构中“个”的语法地位[J]. 现代外语, 2009, 32(1): 13-22+108.
[13] 陆志军, 石定栩. 义务情态句与认知情态句的句法分析[J]. 解放军外国语学院学报, 2021, 44(3): 20-27+160.
[14] Otto, J. (1949) A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles, VI, Morphology. George Allen & Unwin Ltd.
[15] Larson, R.K. (1988) On the Double Object Construction. Linguistic Inquiry, 19, 335-391.
[16] Hale, K. and Keyser, S.J. (1993) On Argument Structure and the Lexical Expression of Syntactic Relations. In: Hale, K. and Keyser, S.J., Eds., The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, The MIT Press, 53-104.
[17] Chomsky, N. (1995) The Minimalist Program. MIT Press.
[18] 程工, 杨大然, 安丰存. 量词结构与假部分结构的统一分析[J]. 当代语言学, 2015, 17(1): 56-70+126.
[19] 蔡维天. 制图理论和汉语语法[J]. 语言学研究, 2019(1): 28-44.
[20] 石定栩. 主观评价词语的句法地位[J]. 外语教学与研究, 2021, 53(6): 803-815.
[21] Wiltschko, M. and Steriopolo, O. (2007) Parameters of Variation in the Syntax of Diminutives. Proceedings of the 2007 Canadian Linguistics Association Annual Conference, Toronto, December 2007, 1-12.
[22] Steriopolo, O. (2013) Diminutive Affixes in the Number Domain: A Syntactic Variation. Questions and Answers in Linguistics, 1, 33-56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[23] Steriopolo, O., Markopoulos, G. and Spyropoulos, V. (2021) A Morphosyntactic Analysis of Nominal Expressive Suffixes in Russian and Greek. The Linguistic Review, 38, 645-686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[24] 丁声树, 等. 现代汉语语法讲话[M]. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1980.
[25] Potts, C. (2007) The Expressive Dimension. Theoretical Linguistics, 33, 165-198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[26] 任鹰. “个”的主观赋量功能及其语义基础[J]. 世界汉语教学, 2013, 27(3): 362-375.
[27] 丁玉琴, 张孝荣. “V +他+ NP”的句法结构及其生成研究[J]. 牡丹江师范学院学报(社会科学版), 2024(2): 37-43.