延迟退休对职工平均养老金替代率的影响研究
Research on the Impact of Delayed Retirement on the Average Pension Replacement Rate of Employees
DOI: 10.12677/ass.2025.1410928, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 蒋梦颖, 王 鹏:西南民族大学经济学院,四川 成都
关键词: 平均养老金替代率延迟退休养老保障地区差异Average Pension Replacement Rate Delay Retirement Pension Security Regional Differences
摘要: 随着人口老龄化日益严峻,社会养老负担不断加重,如何最大化发挥社会养老保障体系的效能已成为当前亟待解决的关键议题。为了缓解养老压力,我国定于2025年1月1日起推行渐进式延迟退休政策。在我国现行的以现收现付为主、兼具基金积累制的统账结合模式下,企业职工的平均养老金替代率成为衡量退休人员生活待遇水平的重要指标。本文通过构建回归模型和预测模型,旨在揭示至2030年《“健康中国2030”规划纲要》目标达成之际,我国各地区平均养老金替代率的变化趋势。研究结果显示受经济发展水平等多重因素影响,我国各地区企业职工养老金替代率存在明显的地域差异,即使提出渐进式延迟退休,其对养老金替代率的提高效用有限。鉴于此,本文提出以下建议:在推进渐进式延迟退休政策的同时,应充分关注平均养老金替代率的地区差异,并在待遇调整幅度、基金调剂等方面给予适当倾斜此外,还应积极构建多元化、多层次的养老保障体系,为退休人员提供更加全面、可持续的养老保障。
Abstract: With the aging population becoming increasingly severe, the social burden of elderly care continues to grow, making it a critical issue to maximize the effectiveness of the social pension system. To alleviate the pressure on pensions, China has scheduled the gradual implementation of a delayed retirement policy starting from January 1, 2025. Under China’s current combined system, which mainly relies on a pay-as-you-go approach while also incorporating fund accumulation, the average pension replacement rate for enterprise employees is an important indicator to measure the living standards of retirees. This paper constructs regression and prediction models to reveal the trend in average pension replacement rates across regions in China by 2030, the target year for the goals set in the “Healthy China 2030” plan. The results show that due to multiple factors such as economic development levels, there are significant regional differences in the enterprise employees’ pension replacement rates, and even the introduction of gradual delayed retirement has a limited effect on improving the replacement rate. In view of this, the paper proposes the following recommendations: while advancing the gradual delayed retirement policy, attention should also be given to regional differences in average pension replacement rates, and appropriate adjustments should be made in terms of benefit adjustments and fund redistribution. In addition, a diversified and multi-level pension system should be actively constructed to provide retirees with a more comprehensive and sustainable social security.
文章引用:蒋梦颖, 王鹏. 延迟退休对职工平均养老金替代率的影响研究[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2025, 14(10): 552-566. https://doi.org/10.12677/ass.2025.1410928

参考文献

[1] 陈东升. 长寿时代的理论与对策[J]. 管理世界, 2020, 36(4): 66-86+129.
[2] 中华人民共和国人力资源和社会保障部. 2023年度人力资源和社会保障事业发展统计公报[Z].
[3] 肖严华. 延迟退休年龄: 实现路径与政策选择[J]. 上海经济研究, 2023(9): 89-96.
[4] 张苏, 朱媛. 养老金替代率如何适应人口结构变化[J]. 甘肃社会科学, 2023(3): 171-180.
[5] 周延, 邵烨铭. 人口结构、利率政策与养老金替代率[J]. 现代经济探讨, 2023(2): 1-14.
[6] 于文广, 管国锋, 乔智. 延迟退休、个税递延对养老金替代率和社会福利的影响及政策优化研究[J]. 统计与信息论坛, 2024, 39(3): 94-106.
[7] 张松彪, 刘长庚. 中国基本养老金区域差距的变化及其影响因素[J]. 经济地理, 2021, 41(12): 43-54.
[8] Šídlo, L., Šprocha, B. and Klapková, M. (2019) Regional Differences in Population Aging in Europe Viewed through Prospective Indicators. Erdkunde, 73, 225-240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] 张熠, 张书博, 陶旭辉. 中国退休制度设计: 基于激励、保险和再分配效应的研究[J]. 管理世界, 2022, 38(7): 90-108.
[10] 曾益, 张冉, 李姝. 渐进式延迟退休年龄: “小步前行”抑或“大步迈进”?——基于养老保险基金可持续性与财政责任的视角[J]. 财政研究, 2021(4): 102-115.
[11] 王晓军, 赵明. 寿命延长与延迟退休: 国际比较与我国实证[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2015, 32(3): 111-128.
[12] 费清, 刘方涛, 张蕊, 等. 区域差异视角下的我国企业职工养老保险替代率缺口及解决路径探寻[J]. 保险研究, 2023(1): 68-83.
[13] 中华人民共和国中央人民政府. 全国人民代表大会常务委员会关于实施渐进式延迟法定退休年龄的决定[Z/OL].
https://www.gov.cn/yaowen/liebiao/202409/content_6974294.htm, 2024-09-13.
[14] 严成樑. 延迟退休、财政支出结构调整与养老金替代率[J]. 金融研究, 2017(9): 51-66.
[15] Oshio, T. and Kobayashi, M. (2010) Area-Level Income Inequality and Individual Happiness: Evidence from Japan. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12, 633-649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Wang, P., Pan, J. and Luo, Z. (2014) The Impact of Income Inequality on Individual Happiness: Evidence from China. Social Indicators Research, 121, 413-435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef