“条条大路通电商”:跳转广告对用户的隐私侵犯研究
“All Roads Lead to E-Commerce”: A Study on the Privacy Infringement of Redirect Ads on Users
摘要: 本文基于质化的研究方法对双十一大促期间“条条大路通电商”的情况进行调查研究发现:跳转广告以超链接的形式帮助用户直接抵达广告所在场域,缩短用户的决策链路,催化其进行消费行为。但事实上,大部分跳转广告的本质就是通过篡夺用户对广告的自主控制权,粗暴地减少用户对跳转广告的回避反应,广告数据的有效性与广告性价比并不如广告主所预期的那样,反而会强化用户对广告和品牌的消极态度。本文以跳转广告为研究对象,分析跳转广告的隐私风险并给予适当的优化建议,以促进跳转广告的合规合法经营。
Abstract: This study employs qualitative research methods to investigate the phenomenon of “all roads lead to e-commerce” during the Double Eleven Shopping Festival promotional period. The findings reveal that redirect advertising, typically embedded as hyperlinks, facilitates direct user access to advertised content, thereby shortening decision-making processes and catalyzing consumption behaviors. However, the inherent mechanism of most redirect advertisements relies on usurping users’ autonomous control over ad interactions, coercively reducing avoidance responses toward such ads. Contrary to advertisers’ expectations regarding data effectiveness and cost-efficiency, this approach ultimately reinforces users’ negative perceptions of both the advertisements and associated brands. Focusing on redirect advertising as the research subject, this paper analyzes its privacy risks and proposes optimization strategies to promote compliance with legal and ethical standards in advertising practices.
文章引用:王天舒, 杜云宇, 沈慧茹. “条条大路通电商”:跳转广告对用户的隐私侵犯研究 [J]. 社会科学前沿, 2025, 14(10): 567-576. https://doi.org/10.12677/ass.2025.1410929

参考文献

[1] Spence, E. and Van Heekeren, B. (2005) Advertising Ethics. Pearson Prentice Hall.
[2] 冯雅菲. 技术范式下智能广告隐私伦理问题研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 广州: 华南理工大学, 2022.
[3] 蔡立媛, 李晓. 人工智能广告侵犯隐私的风险与防御[J]. 青年记者, 2020(6): 93-94.
[4] 李名亮. 智能广告信息伦理风险与核心议题研究[J]. 新闻与传播评论, 2020, 73(1): 76-84.
[5] 张迪. 广告传播视阈下社交媒体用户隐私问题探究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 上海: 上海外国语大学, 2023.
[6] 段淳林, 宋成. 用户需求、算法推荐与场景匹配: 智能广告的理论逻辑与实践思考[J]. 现代传播(中国传媒大学学报), 2020, 42(8): 119-128.
[7] Rodgers, W. and Nguyen, T. (2022) Advertising Benefits from Ethical Artificial Intelligence Algorithmic Purchase Decision Pathways. Journal of Business Ethics, 178, 1043-1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Vlačić, B., Corbo, L., Costa e Silva, S. and Dabić, M. (2021) The Evolving Role of Artificial Intelligence in Marketing: A Review and Research Agenda. Journal of Business Research, 128, 187-203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] 李名亮. 智能广告信息伦理风险与核心议题研究[J]. 新闻与传播评论, 2020, 73(1): 76-84.
[10] Boerman, S.C., Kruikemeier, S. and Zuiderveen Borgesius, F.J. (2017) Online Behavioral Advertising: A Literature Review and Research Agenda. Journal of Advertising, 46, 363-376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] 赵心悦. 社交媒体个性化广告回避影响因素研究——以隐私问题为调节变量[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2020, 9(10): 1567-1573.
[12] 蔡立媛, 周慧. 人工智能广告的“时空侵犯”伦理危机[J]. 青年记者, 2019(15): 91-92.
[13] 徐齐, 邓洁, 申江荣, 唐华锦, 潘纲. 基于事件相机的图像重构综述[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2023(8): 2699-2709.
[14] 何日辉. 大数据时代隐私侵权风险的感知研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 海口: 海南师范大学, 2024.
[15] 宋卓赟. 隐私关注对行为定向网络广告传播效果的影响研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 上海: 东华大学, 2014.
[16] 易江鹏. 个人信息保护中的知情同意原则: 困境与出路[EB/OL].
https://www.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_13195899, 2021-09-10.
[17] 罗江, 范婷睿, 苗苗. 个性化社交媒体广告对消费者广告回避的影响机制研究[J]. 信息系统学报, 2022(1): 62-80.
[18] 朱迪. 大学生对开屏广告回避的影响因素研究——以新疆大学为例[J]. 新闻传播科学, 2024, 12(2): 223-231.
[19] 殷继. 《个性化广告合规发展研究报告》发布: 如何平衡个性化和用户隐私? [EB/OL]. 财经E法, 2022.
https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/SibtBdstFWtRChuprZOGKQ, 2025-09-20.