债权多重让与研究

Research on Multiple Assignments of Debt

摘要: 《合同编通则解释》第50条确立了一般性债权多重让与的通知优先规则，这一规定弥补了先前《民法典》未对一般性债权多重让与作出详细规定的漏洞。在一般性债权多重让与中，债务人可以凭已经向最先通知的受让人履行债务来对抗债权人和其他受让人。这与特殊债权多重让与，即应收账款债权多重转让不同，应收账款债权多重转让被确立为登记优先规则，无论是将应收账款债权进行质押或是转让都将登记视作确定优先顺位的第一要件。通过第50条并结合《民法典》对应收账款债权多重转让的规定，对我国民法中债权多重让与进行综合研究。

Abstract: Article 50 of the Interpretation of the General Rules of Contract Compilation establishes the notification priority rule of the multiple assignment of general claims, which makes up the loophole that the Civil Code did not make detailed provisions on the multiple assignment of general claims. In a general multiple assignment of claims, the debtor may act against the creditor and other assignees by having performed the debt to the first notified assignee. This is different from the multiple assignment of special claims, that is, the multiple assignment of accounts receivable claims, which is established as the registration priority rule, and registration is regarded as the first requirement to determine the priority order whether the accounts receivable claims are pledged or transferred. Through Article 50 and combining with the provisions of the Civil Code on the multiple transfer of accounts receivable claims, this paper makes a comprehensive study on the multiple transfer of claims in our country.