基于对托福新题型“Read in Daily Life”的题型解构分析其对不同基础学生的影响及教学建议
An Analysis of the Students of Different Levels and Teaching Suggestions Based on the Structural Dissection of the New TOEFL Question Type “Read in Daily Life”
摘要: 本文以托福考试改革后新增的“Read in Daily Life”题型为研究对象,以16篇共计40道例题为基础,结合Bloom分类法、CEFR语言能力等级等理论模型,对题型基本特征、设计原理、难度区分、考察能力等方面进行了系统分析,并以5例教师模拟考试案例为基础展开探索性研究。研究揭示,该题型文本类型涵盖邮件、通知、菜单、短信、社交媒体帖子等非学术场景下的短文本,着重考察学生的非线性文本信息解码能力,包括非正式语言的语境含义理解、基于文本特征的合理推断、关键信息筛选等综合技能。基于分析结果,本文从CEFR分层教学及文本类型区分教学等角度,为教师提供了未来教授该题型的系统教学思路,并为该题型的研发在文本类型拓展、认知维度深化、文化维度优化及话题场景补充等方面提供了建设性意见。
Abstract: This study investigates the newly introduced “Read in Daily Life” question type in the reformed TOEFL iBT exam. Based on an analysis of 16 texts and 40 sample questions, and employing theoretical frameworks including Bloom’s Taxonomy and the CEFR proficiency levels, this research provides a systematic examination of the question type’s fundamental characteristics, design principles, difficulty differentiation, and assessment objectives. An exploratory study was further conducted using five simulated test cases completed by instructors. The findings reveal that this question type encompasses short non-academic texts, including emails, notices, menus, text messages, and social media posts, focusing on assessing students’ ability to decode information from non-linear text formats. This includes comprehending the contextual meaning of informal language, making reasonable inferences based on text features, and filtering key information. Based on the analysis, this paper proposes a tiered teaching framework aligned with CEFR levels and text-type-specific teaching strategies, providing teachers with a systematic teaching plan for future instruction of this type of question. Furthermore, it offers constructive recommendations for future question type development in areas such as text type expansion, cognitive dimension deepening, cultural dimension optimization, and topic scenario supplementation.
文章引用:张嘉. 基于对托福新题型“Read in Daily Life”的题型解构分析其对不同基础学生的影响及教学建议[J]. 国外英语考试教学与研究, 2025, 7(4): 159-167. https://doi.org/10.12677/oetpr.2025.74019

参考文献

[1] Sweller, J. (2011) Cognitive Load Theory. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 55, 37-76.
[2] Weir, C.J. (2005) Language Testing and Validation: An Evidence-Based Approach. Palgrave Macmillan.
[3] ETS (2025) Official TOEFL iBT Test® Resources.
https://www.ets.org/toefl/test-takers/ibt/prepare.html?version=after-jan-2026
[4] Halford, G.S., Wilson, W.H., and Phillips, S. (1998) Processing Capacity Defined by Relational Complexity: Implications for Comparative, Developmental and Cognitive Psychology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 803-831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef