基于概念图的国内高中三版数学教材统计内容比较研究——以北师大版、人教版和沪教版为例
A Comparative Study of the Statistical Content in Three Editions of Domestic High School Mathematics Textbooks Based on Concept Maps—Taking the Beijing Normal University Edition, the People’s Education Press Edition, and the Shanghai Education Press Edition as Examples
摘要: 运用Cmaptools软件,对高中数学“统计”部分的知识点进行梳理和划分,绘制有关统计的概念图,对北师大版、人教版和沪教版数学教材的广度、深度以及核心概念展开比较研究。研究发现,三者虽均贯彻国家课程标准对统计核心概念的要求,但在内容覆盖的广度、知识组织的深度上呈现出明显差异。
Abstract: Using Cmaptools software, we organized and divided knowledge points in the “Statistics” section of high school mathematics, created concept maps related to statistics, and conducted a comparative study of the breadth, depth, and core concepts of mathematics textbooks published by Beijing Normal University, People’s Education Press, and Shanghai Education Press. The study found that while all three textbooks adhered to the national curriculum standards for core statistical concepts, they exhibited significant differences in the breadth of content coverage and the depth of knowledge organization.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
Novak, J.D., Gowin, D.B. and Kahle, J.B. (1984) Learning How to Learn. Cambridge University Press, 40-41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[2]
|
曹学良, 郑洁. 关于概念图在概率统计教学中应用的一些思考[J]. 数学教育学报, 2007(1): 37-39.
|
|
[3]
|
李卫平, 钱美兰. 概念图应用于数学课堂教学的实践研究[J]. 长春师范大学学报, 2016, 35(12): 131-133.
|
|
[4]
|
方兴发, 曹谦, 汪霞. 核心素养视域下人教A版(2019)与沪教版(2020)高中数学教材对比分析[J]. 创新教育研究, 2023, 11(7): 1846-1856.
|
|
[5]
|
刘晓彤, 杨渭清. 浅谈高中统计部分的比较分析——以人教版与北师大版教材为例[J]. 创新教育研究, 2020, 8(5): 831-835.
|
|
[6]
|
胡典顺, 王春静, 王静. 基于概念图的中外高中数学教材比较研究——以澳大利亚、美国、英国和中国教材中矩阵内容为例[J]. 数学教育学报, 2020, 29(3): 37-42+62.
|
|
[7]
|
胡茗洁, 胡典顺. 基于概念图的中英澳数学教材复数内容比较研究[J]. 数学通讯, 2021(22): 11-15+32.
|
|
[8]
|
Li, S. and Fan, L. (2024) Using Social Network Analysis to Investigate Mathematical Connections in U.S. and Chinese Textbook Problems. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, Article No. 495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[9]
|
钟丽, 汤琼. 立足概念教学, 培养数学思维[J]. 教育进展, 2024, 14(6): 1278-1282.
|