SST k-ω湍流模型参数优化及其在离心风机性能模拟中的应用
Optimization of SST k-ω Turbulence Model Parameters and Its Application in Performance Simulation of Centrifugal Fans
摘要: 为了提高离心通风机在仿真模拟中的精准度,本研究构建了一种适用于风机流场的湍流模型参数组。以G4-73型8号离心式通风机为研究对象建模绘制网格,首先使用正交分析评估了SST k-ω湍流模型中六个核心参数对风机全压升的敏感性;其次通过拉丁超立方采样构建采样点,使用CFX软件计算各样本点的全压升值;再构建Kriging回归的代理模型,并将代理模型和智能算法相结合,以全压升值最大为目标进行函数迭代寻找最优解。在最优参数组下,风机全压升与理论值的相对误差仅为0.56%,验证了仿真结果精度的显著提升;最后对比分析得出优化湍流模型参数不仅有效改善了小流量工况下的流场预测精度,同时在其他工况点下也显著降低了仿真误差,验证了该方法对风机全流量工况的适用性与可靠性。
Abstract: To enhance the accuracy of the simulation of centrifugal fans, a set of turbulence model parameters suitable for the flow field of the fan was constructed. Taking the G4-73 No. 8 centrifugal fan as the research object, the model was established, and the grid was drawn. Firstly, the sensitivity of six core parameters in the SST k-ω turbulence model to the total pressure rise of the fan was evaluated by orthogonal analysis. Secondly, the sampling points were constructed by Latin hypercube sampling, and the total pressure rise values of each sample point were calculated using CFX software. Then, a Kriging regression surrogate model was constructed, and combined with an intelligent algorithm, the function was iterated to find the optimal solution with the maximum total pressure rise as the objective. Under the optimal parameter set, the relative error between the total pressure rise of the fan and the theoretical value was only 0.56%, verifying the significant improvement in the simulation result accuracy. Finally, through comparative analysis, it was concluded that optimizing the turbulence model parameters not only effectively improved the prediction accuracy of the flow field under low flow conditions, but also significantly reduced the simulation error at other operating points, verifying the applicability and reliability of this method for the full flow conditions of the fan.
文章引用:陈啸晗, 管世林, 黄佳惠, 王海民. SST k-ω湍流模型参数优化及其在离心风机性能模拟中的应用[J]. 建模与仿真, 2025, 14(10): 338-354. https://doi.org/10.12677/mos.2025.1410628

参考文献

[1] Versteeg, H.K. and Malalasekera, W. (2007) An Introduction to Computational Fluid Dynamics—The Finite Volume Method. Pearson.
[2] 冯静安, 唐小琦, 王卫兵, 等. 基于网格无关性与时间独立性的数值模拟可靠性的验证方法[J]. 石河子大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 35(1): 52-56.
[3] 陈江涛, 章超, 吴晓军, 等. 考虑数值离散误差的湍流模型选择引入的不确定度量化[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(9): 234-245.
[4] 张琦, 邵准远, 徐淑君. 双进气高效离心风机的设计优化[J]. 风机技术, 2016, 58(6): 57-61+84.
[5] Prezelj, J. and Novaković, T. (2018) Centrifugal Fan with Inclined Blades for Vacuum Cleaner Motor. Applied Acoustics, 140, 13-23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] 古应华, 吕海波, 焦俊龙, 等. 基于仿生蜗舌的离心风机降噪研究[J]. 风机技术, 2023, 65(6): 11-16.
[7] Wang, J., Liu, X., Tian, C. and Xi, G. (2023) Aerodynamic Performance Improvement and Noise Control for the Multi-Blade Centrifugal Fan by Using Bio-Inspired Blades. Energy, 263, Article 125829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] 李建建. 蜗舌深度对离心风机气动性能和噪声影响研究[J]. 流体机械, 2024, 52(2): 48-53.
[9] 孟凡念, 张子琦, 李浩, 等. 离心通风机CFD气动仿真分析和不确定性评估[J]. 机械设计与制造, 2025: 1-7.
https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=X-VFCYicIZsKNDBMRtWcfjgWzYAAr-WFUtFptA0uI_fNUfWboZVFFn5ZIvNjbwq1fxjgemn0ZIaUiOeEOgb4orxJ-O8kRAAk1P-XXMMVm8cP14PDfYe2CtsWo3EvHrcfKybkXGvYBVQjTAfroZqXaUrtMRHbaVyg-a_t4o-1k1h3u8kaUjZyMYpEBoSvFE1uNo3wilS9TEg=&uniplatform=NZKPT, 2025-09-08.
[10] Chan, C.M., Bai, H.L. and He, D.Q. (2018) Blade Shape Optimization of the Savonius Wind Turbine Using a Genetic Algorithm. Applied Energy, 213, 148-157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Xiao, Q., Wang, J., Yang, X., Ding, Y. and Jiang, B. (2023) An Empirical Noise Model of Centrifugal Fans with Different Volute Tongues Based on Langevin Regression. Journal of Building Engineering, 79, Article 107876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] 张孟石, 王昕, 张亮, 等. 激波边界层干扰流动中SST模型的贝叶斯修正[J]. 力学学报, 2025, 57(9): 2122-2133.
[13] 阎超, 屈峰, 赵雅甜, 等. 航空航天CFD物理模型和计算方法的述评与挑战[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2020, 38(5): 829-857.
[14] 钟伟, 王同光. SST湍流模型参数校正对风力机CFD模拟的改进[J]. 太阳能学报, 2014, 35(9): 1743-1748.
[15] Zhao, Y., Yan, C., Wang, X., Liu, H. and Zhang, W. (2019) Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis of SST Turbulence Model on Hypersonic Flow Heat Transfer. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 136, 808-820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Edeling, W.N., Cinnella, P. and Dwight, R.P. (2014) Predictive RANS Simulations via Bayesian Model-Scenario Averaging. Journal of Computational Physics, 275, 65-91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Ray, J., Lefantzi, S., Arunajatesan, S. and Dechant, L. (2017) Learning an Eddy Viscosity Model Using Shrinkage and Bayesian Calibration: A Jet-in-Crossflow Case Study. ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part B: Mechanical Engineering, 4, Article 011001.
[18] 周宇, 钱炜祺, 邓有奇, 等. k-ω SST两方程湍流模型中参数影响的初步分析[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2010, 28(2): 213-217.
[19] 李文浩, 饶彩燕, 段毅, 等. 多种SST湍流模型对典型分离流动的预测性能[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2025: 1-12.
https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=X-VFCYicIZviRtfCaen--DPTvHL7RBU7uRz79QkjipQ-wd3GA96cUIoFoMKOG4VKIfzV2gXNNnRNUHB0txOMhU5yBLiHVWIcsBX4SxX0iM8LsOtBnnf6muR5bi1vCiH0mRHogfcUexamLhnrD17rbPiC_MkL8KtMPC0iFfxKhCO_sKMt-UGYwwTNU4LMeh6-Iv9V56g-G9M=&uniplatform=NZKPT, 2025-09-09.
[20] 曾宇, 汪洪波, 孙明波, 等. SST湍流模型改进研究综述[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(9): 103-134.