新型耗能技术在抗震加固中的应用研究综述
Reviewing the Application of Innovative Energy Dissipation Technologies in Seismic Reinforcement
DOI: 10.12677/hjce.2025.1410267, PDF,   
作者: 陈 恒, 刘 猛:辽宁工业大学院土木建筑工程学院,辽宁 锦州 收稿日期:2025年9月22日;录用日期:2025年10月12日;发布日期:2025年10月27日
关键词: SMA-摩擦复合装置分级屈服型金属阻尼器CFRP加固技术协同优化机制耗能–自复位SMA-Friction Composite Damper Graded Yield Metal Damper CFRP Strengthening Technique Synergistic Optimization Mechanism Energy Dissipation and Self-Centering
摘要: 本文针对传统抗震结构残余变形大、非延性RC框架脆性破坏风险高等问题,系统研究了SMA-摩擦复合装置、分级屈服型金属阻尼器及CFRP加固技术三类新型耗能装置的协同优化机制。通过理论分析、数值模拟(ABAQUS)及工程案例验证(黄山市医院、上海中心大厦、福州工业厂房等),揭示了三类装置的技术特性与工程局限:SMA-摩擦复合装置通过超弹性相变与摩擦耗能协同实现“耗能–自复位”功能,可将残余位移降低60%以上,但存在高频荷载下耗能衰减、盐雾腐蚀退化及成本高等问题;分级屈服型金属阻尼器通过双环形金属单元串联实现分阶段耗能机制,内环在小震阶段会优先屈服以提供初始刚度,外环在罕遇地震阶段下联合耗能来使滞回环面积扩大,耗能占比达75%左右,但需注意控制面外屈曲风险以及分阶段激活的时序精度;CFRP加固技术通过约束混凝土显著提升了非延性框架延性与耗能能力,但界面剥离风险制约长期性能。针对上述瓶颈,在提出材料改性、智能算法调控及工业化集成等协同优化路径后,实现成本降低、高频耗能稳定、界面粘结强度提升等突破。工程验证表明,优化后装置在残余位移控制、施工效率及全生命周期性能稳定性方面显著优于传统技术,为结构抗震加固提供了系统性解决方案。
Abstract: This study addresses significant residual deformations in traditional seismic structures and the brittle failure risks in non-ductile RC frames. It systematically investigates the synergistic optimization of three energy-dissipation technologies: SMA-friction composite devices, graded yield metal dampers, and CFRP strengthening. Validated through theoretical analysis, numerical simulation (ABAQUS), and engineering cases (e.g., Huangshan City Hospital, Shanghai Tower), the key findings and limitations are highlighted. The SMA-friction device reduces residual displacements by over 60% via super elasticity and friction but faces decay under high-frequency loads and corrosion issues. Graded yield metal dampers utilize a series of dual-ring metallic units to achieve a staged energy dissipation mechanism. The inner ring yields preferentially during minor earthquakes to provide initial stiffness, while the outer ring activates in rare major earthquake events to dissipate energy jointly, thereby expanding the area of the hysteresis loop. The graded yield damper employs dual ring units for staged energy dissipation (75% efficiency) yet risks out-of-plane buckling. CFRP strengthening technology significantly enhances the ductility and energy dissipation capacity of non-ductile frames by providing confinement to concrete, yet the risk of interfacial debonding constrains its long-term performance. Optimization strategies-material modification, intelligent algorithms, and industrialized integration-effectively reduce cost, improve stability, and enhance bond strength. These strategies demonstrate superior performance in residual displacement control and life-cycle stability compared to traditional methods, thereby providing a systematic solution for structural seismic retrofitting.
文章引用:陈恒, 刘猛. 新型耗能技术在抗震加固中的应用研究综述[J]. 土木工程, 2025, 14(10): 2480-2488. https://doi.org/10.12677/hjce.2025.1410267

参考文献

[1] 邱灿星, 杨勇波, 刘家旺. 形状记忆合金滑动摩擦阻尼器自复位支撑受力性能研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2024, 45(1): 139-150.
[2] 张智勇, 门进杰, 王家琛, 等. 防屈曲分级屈服型金属阻尼器抗震性能与屈曲约束设计方法研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2025, 46(6): 83-95.
[3] 刘潮. SMA-复合摩擦耗能装置设计及其减震性能研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 兰州: 兰州理工大学, 2021.
[4] Ghowsi, A.F. and Sahoo, D.R. (2020) Seismic Response of Sma-Based Self-Centering Buckling-Restrained Braced Frames under Near-Fault Ground Motions. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 139, Article 106397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] 陈云, 陈超, 刘涛, 等. 分级屈服型金属阻尼器减震性能分析[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2018, 38(4): 85-92.
[6] 程扬, 许卫晓, 杨伟松, 等. 分阶段屈服金属阻尼器研究综述[J]. 青岛理工大学学报, 2022, 43(3): 83-92.
[7] 陈伟宏, 乔泽惠, 首维荣. CFRP加固震损非延性RC框架抗震性能试验研究[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2020, 55(5): 1009-1016.
[8] Hu, X., Liu, C., Wang, X. and Jiang, C. (2024) Full-Field Quantitative Determination of Strain and Stress Partitioning in Medium Mn TRIP Steels. Metals and Materials International, 30, 953-966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] 李耕墨, 罗开海, 黄世敏, 等. 既有砌体房屋抗震加固方法研究与应用进展综述[J]. 工程抗震与加固改造, 2025, 47(3): 139-147.
[10] 贾春玉. 带有新型复合阻尼器的装配式钢筋混凝土框架结构抗震性能研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 武汉: 武汉工程大学, 2023.
[11] 张鑫, 李书蓉, 岳庆霞. 基于结构体系的抗震加固方法研究综述[J]. 建筑结构, 2023, 53(19): 1-12.
[12] Soltanzadeh, G., Osman, H.B., Vafaei, M. and Vahed, Y.K. (2017) Seismic Retrofit of Masonry Wall Infilled RC Frames through External Post-Tensioning. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 16, 1487-1510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] 项炳泉, 李瑞林, 徐丹, 等. 既有建筑结构抗震加固技术研究综述[J]. 安徽建筑, 2024, 31(10): 43-47, 54.
[14] 张国生. 既有框架结构抗震加固设计与施工技术研究[J]. 砖瓦, 2025(4): 88-90, 95.
[15] 李鹏程, 李勇, 王隽斌, 等. 基于大直径SMA杆的摩擦复合阻尼器滞回性能研究[J]. 建筑结构, 2022, 52(S1): 1041-1045.
[16] Lee, H., Lee, H., Park, H. and Lee, J. (2021) Cyclic Loading Test for Two-Story RC Moment Frames Retrofitted with Internal Steel Frames. Journal of Structural Engineering, 147, Article 04020333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] 张强恒, 梁本亮. 分级屈服型金属阻尼器在框架结构中的应用研究[J]. 建筑技术, 2024, 55(22): 2776-2781.
[18] Zhang, S., Hou, H., Qu, B., Zhu, Y., Li, K. and Fu, X. (2021) Tests of a Novel Re-Centering Damper with SMA Rods and Friction Wedges. Engineering Structures, 236, Article 112125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] Li, X., Zhao, Z., Liang, Y. and Lv, H. (2016) Cyclic Behaviour of Earthquake-and Corrosion-Damaged RC Columns. Magazine of Concrete Research, 68, 1166-1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] Qiu, C., Wang, H., Liu, J., Qi, J. and Wang, Y. (2020) Experimental Tests and Finite Element Simulations of a New Sma-Steel Damper. Smart Materials and Structures, 29, Article 035016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef