超深基坑水下开挖三维数值模拟研究——以上海吴淞口长江隧道工程为例
Three-Dimensional Numerical Simulation of Underwater Excavation in Ultra-Deep Foundation Pits—A Case Study of the Shanghai Wusongkou Yangtze River Tunnel Project
DOI: 10.12677/hjce.2025.1410270, PDF,   
作者: 赵子腾:同济大学土木工程学院,上海;包 蓁:上海隧道工程有限公司,上海
关键词: 超深基坑水下开挖数值模拟变形控制Ultra-Deep Foundation Pit Underwater Excavation Numerical Simulation Deformation Control
摘要: 随着城市地下空间开发的深入,超深基坑在富水软土地区日益增多,其施工面临着变形控制和稳定性等问题。本文依托上海吴淞口长江隧道浦西接收井的超深基坑,采用三维有限元数值模拟方法对基坑水下开挖结合逆作法施工的全过程进行了模拟。模拟结果表明:1) 水下开挖时坑内水体形成的静水压力有效平衡了部分坑外水土压力,最大侧向位移仅为28 mm,变形控制效果良好。2) 开挖至坑底时因卸荷导致的最大隆起量约为10 mm,有效抑制了坑底土体的过大回弹。3) 坑内疏干后素混凝土底板最大上浮量约为10 mm,最大Mises应力为0.118 MPa,远低于C30混凝土的设计强度。4) 抗拔桩受力分布呈现“中间小、两边大”的特点,最大拉力为2332 kN,小于单桩承载力设计值2747 kN。研究结果验证了该超深基坑水下开挖方案的可行性。
Abstract: With the continuous expansion of urban underground space development, the number of ultra-deep foundation pits in water-rich soft soil areas has been increasing, posing challenges in deformation control and overall stability. This study focuses on the ultra-deep foundation pit of the reception shaft on the Puxi side of the Wusongkou Yangtze River Tunnel in Shanghai, where a three-dimensional finite element numerical simulation was carried out to model the entire process of underwater excavation combined with the top-down construction method. The results showed that: 1) the hydrostatic pressure inside the pit during underwater excavation effectively counterbalanced part of the external earth and water pressures, limiting the maximum lateral displacement to only 28 mm with satisfactory deformation control; 2) when excavation reached the pit bottom, unloading induced a maximum heacve of about 10 mm, effectively suppressing excessive rebound of the subsoil; 3) after dewatering, the plain concrete base slab exhibited a maximum uplift of approximately 10 mm and a maximum Mises stress of 0.118 MPa, which is far below the design strength of C30 concrete; 4) the uplift-resisting piles showed a load distribution characterized by “smaller in the middle and larger at the edges,” with a maximum tensile force of 2332 kN, lower than the designed ultimate pile capacity of 2747 kN. These findings confirm the feasibility of the proposed underwater excavation scheme for ultra-deep foundation pits.
文章引用:赵子腾, 包蓁. 超深基坑水下开挖三维数值模拟研究——以上海吴淞口长江隧道工程为例[J]. 土木工程, 2025, 14(10): 2507-2519. https://doi.org/10.12677/hjce.2025.1410270

参考文献

[1] 叶为民, 万敏, 陈宝, 王琼, 卢耀如. 深基坑承压含水层降水对地面沉降的影响[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2009, 5(S2): 1799-1805.
[2] Goh, A.T.C., Zhang, R.H., Wang, W., Wang, L., Liu, H.L. and Zhang, W.G. (2019) Numerical Study of the Effects of Groundwater Drawdown on Ground Settlement for Excavation in Residual Soils. Acta Geotechnica, 15, 1259-1272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] 宋建禹. 临江高承压水超深基坑支护方案研究[J]. 隧道建设(中英文), 2018, 38(9): 1529-1537.
[4] 胡云华. 临江高承压水超深基坑开挖抗突涌分析与对策——以南京纬三路长江隧道梅子洲风井基坑为例[J]. 隧道建设, 2015, 35(11): 1194-1201.
[5] 杨建民, 郑刚. 基坑降水中渗流破坏归类及抗突涌验算公式评价[J]. 岩土力学, 2009, 30(1): 261-264.
[6] 李耀良, 王理想, 余振栋, 袁芬. 超大面积港池基坑的陆上和水下开挖施工技术[J]. 建筑施工, 2008(10): 848-850.
[7] 孙智勇. 水下开挖法在市政工程深基坑施工中的应用[J]. 城市轨道交通研究, 2016, 19(3): 114-118, 137.
[8] 赵宗智. 临江富水超深基坑施工关键技术[J]. 公路, 2017, 62(8): 338-342.
[9] 张健. 超深竖井水下开挖施工关键技术[J]. 公路与汽运, 2011(2): 174-177.
[10] 杨坤. 地铁区间中间风井超深基坑水上水下两级开挖施工关键技术[J]. 施工技术, 2018, 47(S1): 149-152.
[11] 刘建伟, 卢致强, 付波, 许洋, 廖静宇. 地铁超深基坑水下混凝土封底施工技术[J]. 城市轨道交通研究, 2017, 20(11): 83-89.
[12] 陈扬勋, 徐巍, 桑运龙, 赵怡琳, 韩林芳. 富水区深基坑水下开挖工法的设计探索[C]//《施工技术(中英文)》杂志社, 亚太建设科技信息研究院有限公司. 2022年全国工程建设行业施工技术交流会论文集(上册). 北京: 《施工技术(中英文)》杂志社, 2022: 103-107.
[13] 李博, 王贵和, 吕高峰, 王运超. 深基坑水下开挖变形特性及坑底分仓优化[J]. 建筑科学与工程学报, 2019, 36(6): 95-103.
[14] 邹志炎, 刘盛林, 张逸博, 傅旭东. 深基坑注水与水下开挖设计计算方法[J]. 土木与环境工程学报(中英文), 2025, 47(4): 28-36.
[15] 黄应超, 徐杨青. 深基坑降水与回灌过程的数值模拟分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2014, 36(S2): 299-303.