人际语用学视角下习惯性反问的话语效果及影响分析
Analysis of the Discourse Effect and Impact of Habitual Rhetorical Questions from the Perspective of Interpersonal Pragmatics
DOI: 10.12677/ml.2025.13101118, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 邵尤凤:湖南工商大学外国语学院,湖南 长沙;翟金华, 刘饯悯:湖南省湘潭市湘钢一中,湖南 湘潭
关键词: 人际语用学习惯性反问人际和谐管理语用效果Interpersonal Pragmatics Habitual Rhetorical Questioning Interpersonal Harmony Management Pragmatic Effect
摘要: 近年来新的语用现象不断涌现,习惯性反问成为互动中人际关系冲突和不礼貌现象重要话题。本文在汉语语境下,以日常会话中习惯性反问话语作为研究对象,从人际语用学视角观察习惯性反问话语的会话结构、互动模式以及其语用特征,聚焦大学生群体对该话语的认识和使用情况的问卷调查结果,以Spencer-Oatey的人际和谐管理为理论依据,分析在人际交往中因违反人际和谐管理理论而造成语用负面效果,旨在增进习惯性反问话语交际本质的认识,化解冲突,实现人际关系和谐。
Abstract: In recent years, new pragmatic phenomena have emerged, and habitual rhetorical questions have become an important topic of interpersonal conflict and rudeness in interaction. In the context of Chinese, this paper takes habitual rhetorical discourse in daily conversation as the research object, observes the conversation structure, interaction mode and pragmatic characteristics of habitual rhetorical discourse from the perspective of interpersonal pragmatics, focuses on the questionnaire survey results of college students’ understanding and use of the discourse, and analyzes the negative pragmatic effects caused by violation of the theory of interpersonal harmony management in interpersonal communication based on Spencer-Oatey’s interpersonal harmony management, aiming to enhance the understanding of the nature of habitual rhetorical discourse communication resolve conflicts and achieve harmony in interpersonal relationships.
文章引用:邵尤凤, 翟金华, 刘饯悯. 人际语用学视角下习惯性反问的话语效果及影响分析[J]. 现代语言学, 2025, 13(10): 769-776. https://doi.org/10.12677/ml.2025.13101118

参考文献

[1] 冉永平. 人际交往中的和谐管理模式及其违反[J]. 外语教学, 2012, 33(4): 1-5+17.
[2] 冉永平. 人际语用学视角下人际关系管理的人情原则[J]. 外国语(上海外国语大学学报), 2018, 41(4): 44-53+65.
[3] Locher, M.A. and Graham, S.L. (2010) Interpersonal Pragmatics. Mouton de Gruyter.
[4] Spencer-Oatey, H. (2011) Conceptualising “the Relational” in Pragmatics: Insights from Metapragmatic Emotion and (Im)politeness Comments. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 3565-3578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Haugh, M. (2013) Im/politeness, Social Practice and the Participation Order. Journal of Pragmatics, 58, 52-72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] 冉永平, 黄旭. 人际语用学视角下的礼貌与关系[J]. 外国语(上海外国语大学学报), 2020, 43(3): 35-45.
[7] 赵雷. 谈反问句教学[J]. 语言教学与研究, 2000(3): 26-31.
[8] 张文贤, 乐耀. 汉语反问句在会话交际中的信息调节功能分析[J]. 语言科学, 2018, 17(2): 147-159.
[9] 周凌, 张绍杰. 反问句否定含义强度及(不)礼貌等级的实验语用学研究[J]. 外国语(上海外国语大学学报), 2022, 45(1): 25-35.
[10] 冉永平, 方晓国. 语言顺应论视角下反问句的人际语用功能研究[J]. 现代外语, 2008(4): 351, 359+436.
[11] Brown, P., Levinson, S.C. and Gumperz, J.J. (1987) Politeness. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Spencer-Oatey, H. (2008) Face, (Im)politeness and Rapport. In: Spencer-Oatey, H., Ed., Culturally Speaking: Culture, Communication and Politeness Theory, Continuum, 11-47.
[13] Spencer-Oatey, H. (2002) Managing Rapport in Talk: Using Rapport Sensitive Incidents to Explore the Motivational Concerns Underlying the Management of Relations. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 529-545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Spencer-Oatey, H. (2013) Further Reflections on “Relating” and “Face”. A Response to Arundale, Carbaugh and Locher. Journal of Pragmatics, 58, 149-151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] 冉永平, 黄旭. 人际关系的语用学研究[J]. 外语教学, 2019, 40(2): 19-25.
[16] 何自然. 人际语用学: 使用语言处理人际关系的学问[J]. 外语教学, 2018, 39(6): 1-6.
[17] 宫丽丽, 冉永平. 身份理论视域下调侃话语建构虚假冲突的人际关系取向[J]. 外语导刊, 2024, 47(3): 21-30+158.