车载储氢系统失效模式与量化分析方法
Failure Mode and Quantitative Analysis Method of Onboard Hydrogen Storage System
DOI: 10.12677/dsc.2025.144047, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 邓玉娟, 李 玲:衢州职业技术学院机电工程学院,浙江 衢州;毛海军:浙江管卫建设有限公司,浙江 衢州;陈伟伟:衢州市格瑞特金属制造有限公司,浙江 衢州;吴林峰, 董 安:浙江兆时新能源科技有限公司,浙江 衢州
关键词: 高压储氢车载氢系统失效模式量化分析High Pressure Hydrogen Storage Onboard Hydrogen System Failure Mode Quantitative Analysis
摘要: 随着全球能源转型与“碳中和”推进,氢燃料电池汽车作为高效、零排放交通工具迎来发展机遇。车载储氢技术中,高压气态储氢因技术成熟、充放氢快成主流路径。但车载氢系统服役时受压力–温度循环、道路振动冲击和氢气化学环境等复杂载荷耦合作用,其安全性与可靠性成为制约氢燃料电池汽车商业化的关键。本文系统梳理车载氢系统失效模式与机理,从系统、核心部件等多层级深入剖析。在此基础上引入量化分析方法,包括失效判据公式、材料性能数据等,涵盖传统结构强度与动力学分析、疲劳损伤与寿命预测,重点阐述多物理场耦合仿真必要性与进展。通过整合理论、数据与案例,构建从定性到定量的知识框架,为车载氢系统优化设计、安全评估及全生命周期管理提供理论与方法参考,推动氢能交通安全、可靠与可持续发展。
Abstract: With the global energy transition and advancing carbon neutrality initiatives, hydrogen fuel cell vehicles (HFCVs) are gaining momentum as efficient, zero-emission transportation solutions. Among onboard hydrogen storage technologies, the high-pressure gaseous hydrogen storage has become the mainstream approach due to its mature technology and rapid charging/discharging capabilities. However, the safety and reliability of HFCV onboard hydrogen systems remain critical challenges for commercialization, constrained by complex operational factors including pressure-temperature cycling, road vibration impacts, and hydrogen chemical environments. This paper systematically investigates failure modes and mechanisms in onboard hydrogen systems through multi-level analyses at both structural and component levels. Building on this foundation, it introduces quantitative analysis methods including failure criterion formulas and material performance data, covering traditional structural strength and dynamics analysis, fatigue damage and life prediction, with particular emphasis on the necessity and advancements in multiphysics coupled simulations. By integrating theoretical frameworks, empirical data, and case studies, this work establishes a knowledge framework bridging qualitative and quantitative approaches. The findings provide theoretical and methodological references for optimizing onboard hydrogen system design, safety assessments, and full lifecycle management, ultimately advancing the safe, reliable, and sustainable development of hydrogen energy transportation.
文章引用:邓玉娟, 毛海军, 陈伟伟, 吴林峰, 董安, 李玲. 车载储氢系统失效模式与量化分析方法[J]. 动力系统与控制, 2025, 14(4): 484-492. https://doi.org/10.12677/dsc.2025.144047

参考文献

[1] 王艳艳, 赵兴旺, 方川. 十四五商用车燃料电池发动机技术进展与北京冬奥会应用实践[J]. 应用化学, 2025, 42(4): 577-586.
[2] 张杰, 宋科, 张瀚, 等. 车载供氢系统发展现状及展望[J]. 发电技术, 2025, 46(1): 58-71.
[3] 董文妍, 陈向阳, 杨子荣, 等. 燃料电池汽车车载氢系统潜在失效模式及原因分析[J]. 消防科学与技术, 2024, 43(5): 716-721.
[4] 郭晋, 张耕, 陈国华, 等. 车载液氢气瓶设计技术的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4221-4229.
[5] 徐展, 魏蔚, 许春华, 等. 面向车载深冷高压供氢系统的控制策略研究[J]. 太阳能学报, 2021, 42(5): 32-38.
[6] 訚耀保, 罗九阳, 陈洁萍, 等. 车载高压输氢系统气瓶输氢加氢特性研究[J]. 机床与液压, 2008(10): 33-36+150.
[7] 陈长聘, 王新华, 陈立新. 燃料电池车车载储氢系统的技术发展与应用现状[J]. 太阳能学报, 2005(3): 141-148.
[8] 陈萌竹, 黄伟, 许恩永, 等. 车载氢系统拓扑-尺寸多目标联合优化[J]. 机械设计与制造, 2025(3): 220-225.
[9] Yu, D., Al-Yafawi, A., Nguyen, T.T., Park, S. and Chung, S. (2011) High-Cycle Fatigue Life Prediction for Pb-Free BGA under Random Vibration Loading. Microelectronics Reliability, 51, 649-656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Guzmán, A.A., Jeon, J., Hartmaier, A. and Janisch, R. (2020) Hydrogen Embrittlement at Cleavage Planes and Grain Boundaries in Bcc Iron—Revisiting the First-Principles Cohesive Zone Model. Materials, 13, Article 5785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Barrera, O. and Cocks, A.C.F. (2013) Computational Modelling of Hydrogen Embrittlement in Welded Structures. Philosophical Magazine, 93, 2680-2700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Achour, Y., Bahsis, L., EL Kassimi, A., EL Haddad, M., Lazar, S., Hafid, A., et al. (2024) Removal of Methylene Blue Using Bombax Buonopozense Bark: Factorial Experimental Design, DFT, and Molecular Dynamics Studies. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, 14, 29795-29810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] 张国信. 氢环境脆化损伤机理, 影响因素及相关问题探讨[J]. 炼油技术与工程, 2024, 54(8): 1-7.
[14] 李凤侠, 张俊, 赵呈刚. 基于文献计量学的氢脆研究的演进, 热点和趋势分析[J]. 材料导报, 2019(z2): 488-496.