滩相碳酸盐岩储层测井物性参数智能机器解释——以JN区块飞三段为例
Intelligent Machine Interpretation of Logging Physical Parameters of Beach Facies Carbonate Reservoir —Taking Fei-3 Member of JN Block as an Example
DOI: 10.12677/ojns.2025.136122, PDF,    国家自然科学基金支持
作者: 马婷婷, 谢润成, 陈 成, 白皓瀚, 李思远:成都理工大学能源学院(页岩气现代产业学院),四川 成都;付晓飞:中石化江汉油田分公司勘探开发研究院,湖北 武汉
关键词: JN区块飞三段LightGBM模型回归梯度提升树决策树(GBDT)孔隙度渗透率JN Block Fei-3 Member LightGBM Model Regression Gradient Boost Decision Tree (GBDT) Porosity Permeability
摘要: 滩相碳酸盐岩储层因强烈的非均质性和复杂的孔隙结构,其测井物性参数解释一直是研究的难点和重点。目前的研究主要集中在通过岩心、成像测井、核磁共振等特殊资料,结合机器学习等新技术,建立针对不同岩石物理相和孔隙结构的解释模型,以实现储层参数精细计算和有效性评价。传统AC-POR预测方法难以准确解释储层的孔隙度,为准确了解JN区块飞三段储层的孔隙度和渗透率,更精确地评估储层的含油性和产能,本文基于录井、测试等资料,利用AC、GR、DEN等测井数据,通过机器学习回归法(LightGBM模型回归和梯度提升决策树(GBDT)),对JN区块飞三段储层孔隙度和渗透率进行解释模拟,显著提高了测井参数预测的准确性。结果表明,与传统方法相比,机器学习模型显著提高了测井参数的预测精度,为JN区块飞三段储层评价与开发提供了可靠依据。
Abstract: Due to the strong heterogeneity and complex pore structure of beach carbonate reservoirs, the interpretation of logging physical parameters has always been a difficulty and focus of research. The current research mainly focuses on the establishment of interpretation models for different rock physical phases and pore structures through special data such as core, imaging logging, and nuclear magnetic resonance, combined with new technologies such as machine learning to achieve fine calculation and effectiveness evaluation of reservoir parameters. The traditional AC-POR prediction method is difficult to accurately explain the porosity of the reservoir. In order to accurately understand the porosity and permeability of the reservoir in the Fei-3 Member of the JN Block and more accurately evaluate the oil content and productivity of the reservoir, this paper is based on data from mud logging and testing. Using AC, GR, DEN and other logging data, through machine learning regression method (LightGBM model regression and gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT)), the porosity and permeability of the Fei-3 Member of the JN Block are explained and simulated, which significantly improves the accuracy of logging parameter prediction. The results demonstrate that the machine learning models significantly improve the prediction accuracy of logging parameters compared to conventional methods, providing a reliable foundation for reservoir evaluation and development in the Fei-3 Member of the JN Block.
文章引用:马婷婷, 谢润成, 付晓飞, 陈成, 白皓瀚, 李思远. 滩相碳酸盐岩储层测井物性参数智能机器解释——以JN区块飞三段为例[J]. 自然科学, 2025, 13(6): 1166-1176. https://doi.org/10.12677/ojns.2025.136122

参考文献

[1] 任义丽, 周相广. 基于机器学习的储集层含油气性评价[J]. 信息系统工程, 2019(6): 21-22.
[2] 曹志民, 吴云, 韩建, 等. 测井数据岩相分类的机器学习方法和大数据岩相分类探讨[J]. 化工自动化及仪表, 2017, 44(8): 717-720+729.
[3] 马文礼, 李治平, 孙玉平, 等. 基于机器学习的页岩气产能非确定性预测方法研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2019, 26(2): 101-105.
[4] 杨森, 吴时国, 王吉亮, 等. 基于机器学习方法的天然气水合物稳定带厚度计算[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(11): 1679-1690.
[5] 张东晓, 陈云天, 孟晋. 基于循环神经网络的测井曲线生成方法[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2018, 45(4): 598-607.
[6] 柴明锐, 程丹, 张昌民, 等. 机器学习方法对砂砾岩岩屑成分的预测——以西北缘X723井百口泉组为例[J]. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 32(5): 22-28+61.
[7] 李克文, 周广悦, 路慎强, 等. 一种基于机器学习的有利区评价新方法[J]. 特种油气藏, 2019, 26(3): 7-11.
[8] 程希, 程宇雪, 程佳豪, 等. 基于机器学习与大数据技术的地球物理测井系统[J]. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 34(6): 108-116.
[9] 区舫, 杨辉廷, 黄晓兵. X气田飞仙关组礁滩相储层测井解释方法应用[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2021, 11(5): 744-752.
[10] 靳秀菊. 普光气田礁滩相储层非均质性定量表征技术研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 北京: 中国石油大学(北京), 2017.
[11] 由凯, 杨知敏, 王思航, 等. 建南气田飞仙关组飞三段储层特征研究[J]. 重庆科技学院学报(自然科学版), 2014, 16(2): 5-8.
[12] 毕海龙, 李斌, 彭军, 等. 四川盆地东北部飞仙关组优质储层特征[J]. 海相油气地质, 2010, 15(2): 30-35.
[13] 黄强, 高秀娥, 吴丽萍. 对建南构造南飞三气藏储层地质特征的认识[J]. 江汉石油职工大学学报, 2011, 24(2): 6-7+18.
[14] 彭美霞, 冯琼. 建南气田碳酸盐岩储层测井解释方法研究[J]. 资源环境与工程, 2007(5): 520-523.
[15] 张建勇, 刘文汇, 腾格尔, 等. 建南气田长兴组-飞仙关组天然气特征及气源分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2010, 21(6): 1004-1013.
[16] 李爱荣, 李净红, 张金功. 建南气田天然气地球化学特征及成因[J]. 石油学报, 2015, 36(10): 1199-1209+1298.
[17] 万云强, 殷文洁, 陈明剑. 建南地区低孔低渗储集层改造技术应用效果分析[J]. 石油天然气学报(江汉石油学院学报), 2005(2): 249-250.
[18] 马登峰, 康红, 刘漪. 建南气田北部下三叠统飞仙关组飞三段白云岩成因[J]. 天然气勘探与开发, 2014, 37(1): 5-9+95.
[19] 曾庆立. 建南气田周缘地区飞仙关组沉积特征与勘探目标[J]. 江汉石油职工大学学报, 2004(2): 8-9, 22.
[20] 梁西文, 张莉. 川东建南地区须家河组储层特征及发育控制因素研究[J]. 华南地质, 2021, 37(1): 53-63.
[21] Ke, G., Meng, Q., Finley, T., et al. (2017) LightGBM: A Highly Efficient Gradient Boosting Decision Tree. Proceedings of Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Long Beach, 4-9 December 2017, 569-577.
[22] Friedman, J.H. (2002) Stochastic Gradient Boosting. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 38, 367-378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[23] Luo, Y., Xu, Q., Li, W., Jiang, F. and Xiao, B. (2021) A Multi-Step Decision Prediction Model Based on LightGBM. 2021 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data), Orlando, 15-18 December 2021, 5714-5718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[24] 肖晓, 闫建平, 郭伟, 等. 基于LightGBM算法的页岩气储层甜点参数预测方法[J]. 中国煤炭地质, 2023, 35(10): 28-37.
[25] Liao, Z., Huang, Y., Yue, X., Lu, H., Xuan, P. and Ju, Y. (2016) In Silico Prediction of Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid Type-A Receptors Using Novel Machine-Learning-Based SVM and GBDT Approaches. BioMed Research International, 2016, Article ID: 2375268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] Ma, X., Ding, C., Luan, S., Wang, Y. and Wang, Y. (2017) Prioritizing Influential Factors for Freeway Incident Clearance Time Prediction Using the Gradient Boosting Decision Trees Method. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 18, 2303-2310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[27] Zhang, C., Zhang, Y., Shi, X., Almpanidis, G., Fan, G. and Shen, X. (2019) On Incremental Learning for Gradient Boosting Decision Trees. Neural Processing Letters, 50, 957-987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[28] 葛恭豪. 机器学习算法原理及效率分析[J]. 电子世界, 2018(1): 65-66.
[29] Farebrother, R.W. (1991) A Simple Bayesian Estimation Problem with Laplace Disturbances and Absolute-Error Loss Function-Solution. Econometric Theory, 7, 140-141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef