南北歌剧,美学分宗——论威尔第歌剧之优美感与瓦格纳歌剧之崇高感
The Aesthetics of Opera in the North and the South Are Divided—On the Elegance of Verdi’s Operas and the Sublimity of Wagner’s Operas
摘要: 浪漫主义时期,威尔第和瓦格纳两人分别代表了南北的不同歌剧观。文章由德意志哲学家康德的“优美感”与“崇高感”的概念分析入手,梳理二人不同的民族性、音乐美学思想及其源流,通过对二者歌剧中情节、女性角色和乐队作用的解读,进一步阐释优美感与崇高感的互相包含与转换,试图揭示威尔第与瓦格纳分别以优美感和崇高感为主要美学特征的歌剧风格,以期探讨优美感与崇高感的美学概念用于音乐研究的可能性。
Abstract: In the Romantic period, Verdi and Wagner respectively represented different views of opera in the north and south. The article starts with the analysis of the concepts of “aesthetic sense” and “sublime sense” of German philosopher Kant, sorts out their different national characteristics, musical aesthetic thoughts and their origins, and further explains the mutual inclusion and transformation of aesthetic sense and sublime sense through the interpretation of the plots, female characters and the role of the orchestra in their operas. This paper tries to reveal the opera styles of Verdi and Wagner, which are mainly characterized by aesthetic sense and sublime sense respectively, in order to explore the possibility of applying the aesthetic concepts of aesthetic sense and sublime sense to music research.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
朱光潜. 西方美学史(上) [M]. 北京: 北京理工大学出版社, 2018.
|
|
[2]
|
(德)康德. 论优美感和崇高感[M]. 何兆武, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2020.
|
|
[3]
|
(美)朗(Long H. B.). 西方文明中的音乐[M]. 顾连理, 张洪岛, 杨燕迪, 汤亚汀, 译. 贵阳: 贵州人民出版社, 2001.
|
|
[4]
|
梁大鹏. 德、意浪漫主义歌剧的美学分野[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 武汉: 武汉音乐学院, 2010.
|
|
[5]
|
刘经树. 摧毁“乐圣”偶象, 探究杰作真谛——评达尔豪斯的史学理论[J]. 中国音乐学, 1998(1): 82-89.
|
|
[6]
|
(德)瓦格纳. 瓦格纳论音乐[M]. 廖辅叔, 译. 上海: 上海音乐出版社, 2002: 253.
|
|
[7]
|
于润洋. 歌剧《特里斯坦与伊索尔德》前奏曲与终曲的音乐学分析(上) [J]. 音乐研究, 1993(1): 41-55.
|