技术支持的个性化学习对学生学习效果的影响——基于46篇实验与准实验的元分析
The Impact of Technology-Supported Personalized Learning on Student Learning Outcomes—A Meta-Analysis of 46 Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Studies
摘要: 随着教育数字化转型的加速,技术支持的个性化学习在教育领域中的应用日益广泛,但其对学习效果的整体影响仍缺乏系统性评估。文章采用元分析方法综合分析2014~2025年国内外46篇关于技术支持个性化学习的相关实验与准实验研究文献。以个性化学习为自变量,学习成绩为因变量,样本量、学科领域、研究环境、干预持续时间、学习方法和学习者建模特征为调节变量,探讨技术支持个性化学习对学习效果的影响。结果表明,技术支持个性化学习对学习效果具有中等程度的正向促进作用,且研究间存在显著异质性。调节效应检验发现,样本量、学科领域、研究环境、干预持续时间这些调节变量未呈现显著组间差异,而个性化学习方法和学习者建模特征对学习效果的影响存在显著调节作用。文章通过研究,旨在评估技术支持个性化学习对学习效果的影响,以期为数智技术赋能教学实践背景下的教育实践者和研究者提供参考。
Abstract: With the acceleration of education digital transformation, technology-supported personalized learning (TSPL) has been increasingly adopted. However, there remains a lack of systematic evaluation of its overall impact on students’ learning outcomes. This study employed a meta-analysis method to synthesize 46 experimental and quasi-experimental research studies (2014~2025) on TSPL. Personalized learning served as the independent variable while students’ academic performance as the dependent variable. Moderator variables—specifically sample size, disciplinary field, research setting, intervention duration, learning methods, and learners’ modeling characteristics—were examined to assess the impact of TSPL on learning outcomes. The results show that TSPL has a moderate positive effect on students’ learning outcomes, with significant heterogeneity was observed among studies. Moderator analysis reveals that moderator variables such as sample size, disciplinary field, research setting, intervention duration did not show statistically significant subgroup differences, while learner modeling characteristics and personalized learning methods exhibited a significant moderating effect on learning outcomes. This study evaluated the impact of TSPL on students’ learning outcomes, with the expectation of providing references for educators and researchers in the context of teaching practices empowered by digital intelligence technologies.
文章引用:冯玉婕. 技术支持的个性化学习对学生学习效果的影响——基于46篇实验与准实验的元分析[J]. 教育进展, 2025, 15(11): 38-48. https://doi.org/10.12677/ae.2025.15112003

参考文献

[1] 顾小清, 王馨怡. 从数据驱动到数智融合: 以数字轨迹刻画学习经历[J]. 现代远程教育研究, 2025, 37(3): 3-11.
[2] 刘相聪, 董玉琦, 陈兴冶, 等. 个性化学习调节学业情绪的实证研究——以小学数学“圆的初步认识”单元教学为例[J]. 现代教育技术, 2025, 35(4): 110-118.
[3] 刘晓琳, 张立国. 技术增强型学习环境中的“离心效应”: 现象、成因及破解[J]. 电化教育研究, 2019, 40(12): 44-50.
[4] 朱永海, 张佳鑫, 韩锡斌. 基于生成式人工智能的个性化学习新形态[J]. 电化教育研究, 2025, 46(4): 58-64.
[5] 王胜兰, 彭双. 技术增强型学习环境对学生发展的影响[J]. 中国教育信息化, 2025, 31(3): 107-117.
[6] Shemshack, A. and Spector, J.M. (2020) A Systematic Literature Review of Personalized Learning Terms. Smart Learning Environments, 7, Article No. 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Hooshyar, D., Weng, X., Sillat, P.J., Tammets, K., Wang, M. and Hämäläinen, R. (2024) The Effectiveness of Personalized Technology-Enhanced Learning in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis with Association Rule Mining. Computers & Education, 223, Article ID: 105169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Zheng, L., Long, M., Zhong, L. and Gyasi, J.F. (2022) The Effectiveness of Technology-Facilitated Personalized Learning on Learning Achievements and Learning Perceptions: A Meta-Analysis. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 11807-11830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Xie, H., Chu, H., Hwang, G. and Wang, C. (2019) Trends and Development in Technology-Enhanced Adaptive/Personalized Learning: A Systematic Review of Journal Publications from 2007 to 2017. Computers & Education, 140, Article ID: 103599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] 李振, 董晓晓, 周东岱, 等. 自适应学习系统中知识图谱的人机协同构建方法与应用研究[J]. 现代教育技术, 2019, 29(10): 80-86.
[11] 王小根, 吕佳琳. 从学习者模型到学习者孪生体——学习者建模研究综述[J]. 远程教育杂志, 2021, 39(2): 53-62.
[12] 王一岩, 郑永和. 可解释学习者建模: 价值意蕴与应用图景[J]. 现代远程教育研究, 2023, 35(5): 96-103.
[13] Rau, M.A., Zahn, M., Misback, E., Herder, T. and Burstyn, J. (2021) Adaptive Support for Representational Competencies during Technology-Based Problem Solving in Chemistry. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 30, 163-203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Chou, C.Y. and Chang, C.H. (2021) Developing Adaptive Help-Seeking Regulation Mechanisms for Different Help-Seeking Tendencies. Educational Technology & Society, 24, 54-66.
[15] Ustun, A.B., Zhang, K., Karaoğlan-Yilmaz, F.G. and Yilmaz, R. (2022) Learning Analytics Based Feedback and Recommendations in Flipped Classrooms: An Experimental Study in Higher Education. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 55, 841-857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Higgins, J.P.T., Thompson, S.G., Deeks, J.J., et al. (2003) Measuring Inconsistency in Meta-Analyses. BMJ, 327, 557-560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Cohen, J. (1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd Edition, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 26.
[18] 谷伟, 董玉琦, 陈兴冶, 等. 基于认知起点的互动式个性化学习资源设计——以小学数学“中位数与众数”为例[J]. 全球教育展望, 2023, 52(7): 71-81.
[19] 牟智佳. MOOCs学习参与度影响因素的结构关系与效应研究——自我决定理论的视角[J]. 电化教育研究, 2017, 38(10): 37-43.
[20] Slavin, R. and Smith, D. (2009) The Relationship between Sample Sizes and Effect Sizes in Systematic Reviews in Education. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 31, 500-506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] 彭晛, 靳燕燕, 刘三女牙, 杨微, 刘智. 在线学习空间下的话语互动质量评价及其实践研究[J]. 现代教育技术, 2025, 35(3): 107-117.
[22] 师亚飞, 童名文, 孙佳, 戴红斌, 龙陶陶, 王建虎. 混合同步学习环境对学生认知投入的影响机制研究[J]. 中国远程教育, 2021(9): 29-38, 68, 77.