连续跨河桥梁的河道水动力特性模拟
Hydrodynamic Characteristics of River with Continuous River-Crossing Bridges Simulation
DOI: 10.12677/hjce.2025.1411276, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 崔凌一, 刘丽红*, 许成成:安徽理工大学地球与环境学院,安徽 淮南;高 玮:安徽省交通勘察设计院有限公司,安徽 合肥;王 芳:山东省鲁南地质工程勘察院,山东 济宁
关键词: HEC-RAS连续跨河桥梁数值模型水动力特性桥梁壅水高度断面平均流速HEC-RAS Continuous River-Crossing Bridges Numerical Model Hydrodynamic Characteristic Bridge Backwater Average Sectional Flow Velocity
摘要: 本文以安徽省蚌埠市淮河干流的四座连续跨河桥梁为例,使用HEC-RAS建立蚌埠闸下至临淮关上游10 km之间河段的一维水动力数值模型,模拟计算三种设计工况下各桥梁的壅水值及流速值。结果表明:HEC-RAS一维水动力模型能很好地再现连续桥梁的水动力特性过程,河道水位模拟值与实测值的水位误差在1 cm左右,表明该模型能较好反映河道洪水的实际运动情况;四座桥梁的壅水值都随河道流量的减小而减小,三个模拟计算工况下桥梁壅水值在0 m~0.026 m范围内;桥下断面平均流速均大于桥梁上游断面平均流速,断面平均流速的增幅随河道流量的减小呈现出减缓的趋势,断面平均流速增大值均在0.04 m/s以内。
Abstract: This article takes four consecutive river-crossing bridges along the main stream of the Huai River in Bengbu City, Anhui Province, as an example. It uses HEC-RAS to establish a one-dimensional hydrodynamic numerical model for the river section between the Bengbu Dam and the upstream of Linhuai Pass over a distance of 10 km, simulating and calculating the water blockage values and flow velocity values at each bridge under three design conditions. The results show that the HEC-RAS one-dimensional hydrodynamic model can effectively reproduce the hydrodynamic characteristics of continuous bridges. The simulated water level in the river channel shows an error of about 1 cm compared to the measured values, indicating that the model can accurately reflect the actual movement of river floods; the water blockage values at the four bridges decrease as the river flow diminishes, with water blockage values under the three simulated conditions ranging from 0 to 0.026 m; the average flow velocity under the bridge section is always greater than that of the upstream section, and the increase in average flow velocity shows a tendency to slow down as the river flow decreases, with increases in average flow velocity remaining within 0.04 m/s.
文章引用:崔凌一, 刘丽红, 高玮, 王芳, 许成成. 连续跨河桥梁的河道水动力特性模拟[J]. 土木工程, 2025, 14(11): 2569-2576. https://doi.org/10.12677/hjce.2025.1411276

参考文献

[1] 石喜, 谭春彬, 贡力, 等. 河道斜交桥梁壅水及流场特性分析[J]. 泥沙研究, 2024, 49(2): 64-71.
[2] 吴时强, 薛万云, 吴修锋, 等. 城市行洪河道桥群阻水叠加效应量化研究[J]. 人民黄河, 2019, 41(10): 96-102.
[3] 王路, 刘宏伟, 魏凯, 等. 跨河桥梁基础冲刷研究综述[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2025, 42(7): 94-103.
[4] 雷婷, 任建民, 陶虎, 等. 桥墩基础局部冲刷计算方法的对比研究[J]. 泥沙研究, 2020, 45(5): 61-68.
[5] 孙治平, 赵志宏, 刘子金, 等. 基于MIKE21的跨河桥梁壅水数值模拟分析[J]. 水资源与水工程学报, 2022, 33(6): 129-136.
[6] 骆文广, 陆晶, 赖昊, 等. 近距多座并行桥梁墩前壅水研究[J]. 四川大学学报(工程科学版), 2015, 47(4): 6-13.
[7] 蒋卫威, 鱼京善, 王纤阳, 等. 基于三维水动力模型与经验公式的桥梁壅水模拟与计算[J]. 水利水电技术, 2020, 51(9): 97-104.
[8] 任梅芳, 徐宗学, 苏广新. 基于二维水动力模型与经验公式的桥梁壅水计算及其对比分析[J]. 水力发电学报, 2017, 36(5): 78-87.
[9] Zhang, X., Lu, Y., Wu, X., Wang, T. and He, S. (2023) Simulation Study on the Influence of the Number of Bridge Piers on the Flow Regime of the Lower Yellow River. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 16, Article No. 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] 孟如真, 胡阳, 王志华, 等. 基于MIKE21、HEC-RAS及经验公式的桥梁壅水模拟及对比分析[J]. 城市道桥与防洪, 2022(10): 221-226, 25.
[11] 黄靖轩, 陶涛, 孙小双, 等. 桥墩阻水比对弯道河流流速分布的影响[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2022, 22(22): 9781-9789.
[12] 陈隆吉, 李达, 侯玮, 等. 淮河干流洪峰流量变化特征[J]. 南水北调与水利科技(中英文), 2022, 20(1): 171-179.
[13] 贲鹏, 倪晋, 彭亮. 淮河干流蚌埠至浮山段河道整治效果及浮山以下河道整治必要性[J]. 中国防汛抗旱, 2025, 35(1): 36-40, 46.
[14] 何家伟. HEC-RAS模型在桥墩壅水计算中的应用[J]. 水利技术监督, 2022(2): 163-165, 210.
[15] 李雨竹, 程磊, 程旭, 等. 基于HEC-RAS模型的城集镇洪灾淹没分析研究[J]. 武汉大学学报(工学版), 2023, 56(12): 1536-1545.
[16] 袁玉, 巴欢欢, 胡学东, 等. 基于HEC-RAS的水库坝址上下游桥梁工程壅水计算分析[J]. 水利水电快报, 2023, 44(1): 77-80, 86.
[17] 何刚, 何训喜. 淮河流域水资源-经济-社会-环境耦合协调研究[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2024, 24(11): 4484-4493.
[18] 闫杰超. 输水明渠桥梁群壅水影响数值模拟分析[J]. 水利水电快报, 2023, 44(12): 76-81, 87.