行政执法中“情理难题”的司法应对策略
Judicial Response Strategy of “Moral-Law Problems” in Administrative Enforcement
摘要: 行政执法中“情理难题”的司法应对策略,包括运用法律解释和裁量权、借鉴国外先进执法理念和经验、平衡裁量论与解释论在行政执法中的争议、引入“柔性执法”理念、加强行政执法人员专业素养和能力培养、发挥司法审查在解决“情理难题”中的重要作用。同时,应当加强行政执法与司法应对的互动协调发展,包括建立健全监督机制、完善法律法规、提升专业素养与能力,以实现双方依法行使职权、公正执法,并在法治社会建设中发挥更重要的作用。
Abstract: “Moral-law problem” in administrative law enforcement of judicial countermeasures, including using legal interpretation and discretion, draw lessons from foreign advanced law enforcement concept and experience, balance discretion and interpretation theory in administrative law enforcement, the introduction of “flexible law enforcement” concept, strengthen the administrative law enforcement personnel professionalism and ability training, play a judicial review in the important role in solving “moral-law problem”. At the same time, we should strengthen the interaction and coordinated development of administrative law enforcement and judicial response, including the establishment and improvement of supervision mechanism, improvement of laws and regulations, promotion of professional quality and ability, so as to realize the exercise of functions and powers in accordance with the law, fair law enforcement, and play a more important role in the construction of a society of the rule of law.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
庞明礼, 陈念平. 城市化进程中的空间挤压与行动者策略——关于城管执法研究的文献综述[J]. 上海行政学院学报, 2020, 21(2): 73-85.
|
|
[2]
|
[美]博登海默. 法理学: 法律哲学与法律方法[M]. 邓正来, 译. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 2004: 339.
|
|
[3]
|
熊樟林. 企业行政合规: 功能主义的一块试验田[J]. 当代法学, 2024, 38(3): 31-42.
|
|
[4]
|
[美]本杰明∙卡多佐. 司法过程的性质[M]. 苏力, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1998: 51-52.
|
|
[5]
|
[美]罗尔斯. 正义论(修订版) [M]. 何怀宏, 何包钢, 廖申白, 译. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社, 2009: 3.
|
|
[6]
|
陈悦. 论自动化行政中算法决策风险的“人在回路”治理模式[J]. 行政法学研究, 2024(4): 35-46.
|
|
[7]
|
马忠泉. 理论∙实践∙价值: 包容性执法原则的理论诠释[J]. 理论月刊, 2024(3): 122-133.
|
|
[8]
|
黄琳. 论政策裁量的司法审查[J]. 行政法学研究, 2024(4): 124-135.
|
|
[9]
|
[法]孟德斯鸠. 论法的精神(上) [M]. 张雁深, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1961: 184.
|
|
[10]
|
魏文杰, 余洋. 数字化时代行政裁量治理: 价值、隐忧与法律规制[J]. 江西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2024, 57(3): 93-99.
|