生成式人工智能时代文本与数据挖掘的著作权合理使用规则构建
Construction of Fair Use Rules for Copyright in Text and Data Mining in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence
摘要: 生成式人工智能模型在数据输入及训练阶段需依赖对海量文本、图像等作品的复制与预处理,然而我国现行著作权法却并未为此类行为提供合法基础,导致相关作品的复制权、演绎权等著作权侵权风险不断累积。文本与数据挖掘版权例外规则作为一项平衡技术发展与著作权人利益的制度创新,逐渐在国际社会得到认可与广泛应用。本文以欧盟已经相对成熟的文本与数据挖掘版权例外规则为蓝本研究,探寻这一制度的具体内容和司法实践效果并进行中国镜鉴,最后提出把文本与数据挖掘行为纳入著作权法合理使用情形的合法路径,同时建议配套必要的技术措施、设置开发者披露义务,并增加著作权人权利平衡和补偿机制。
Abstract: Generative artificial intelligence models, in the data input and training stages, rely on copying and pre-processing vast amounts of works such as texts and images. However, China’s current Copyright Law does not provide a lawful basis for such activities, leading to a continual accumulation of copyright infringement risks relating to reproduction and adaptation rights of the relevant works. The copyright exception rules for text and data mining (TDM), as an institutional innovation balancing technological development with the interests of copyright owners, have gradually gained international recognition and widespread application. This paper takes the EU’s comparatively mature TDM copyright exception framework as its blueprint, investigates the specific content of this regime and its judicial practice effects, and offers a Chinese mirror assessment. Finally, it proposes a lawful path to incorporate TDM activities within the legitimate uses under copyright law, while also recommending the accompanying technical measures, the introduction of developers’ disclosure obligations, and the strengthening of balance and compensation mechanisms for copyright owners.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
包赛君, 肖冬梅. 生成式人工智能训练数据的著作权法因应: 欧盟版权例外规则及其对我国的启示分析[J]. 图书馆论坛, 2025, 45(6): 123-132.
|
|
[2]
|
吴汉东. 著作权合理使用制度研究[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2020: 236.
|
|
[3]
|
王振硕. 生成式人工智能时代数据安全法益的保护模式塑造[C]//《新兴权利》集刊2023年第2卷——生成式人工智能法律问题研究文集. 天津: 南开大学法学院, 2024: 94-106.
|
|
[4]
|
哈尔滨工业大学自然语言处理研究所. ChatGPT调研报告[EB/OL]. 2025-09-24. https://cloud.tencent.com/developer/news/1022565, 2025-10-18.
|
|
[5]
|
包赛君, 唐思慧. 生成式人工智能模型训练中的作品合理使用问题研究[J]. 图书馆建设, 2025(3): 48-59.
|
|
[6]
|
樊祜玺. 数字环境下文本与数据挖掘版权例外规则构建[J]. 图书馆工作与研究, 2024(9): 26-35.
|
|
[7]
|
EUR-Lex (2019) Directive (EU) 2019/790 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2019 on Copyright and Related Rights in the Digital Single Market and Amending Directives 96/9/EC and 2001/29/EC (Text with EEA Relevance. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2019/790/oj/eng
|
|
[8]
|
刘诚. 生成式人工智能数据训练的版权保护及其国际经验[J]. 重庆社会科学, 2025(7): 6-17.
|
|
[9]
|
张涛. 人工智能大模型训练的著作权困境及其调适路径[J]. 现代法学, 2025, 47(2): 189-208.
|
|
[10]
|
马一德, 汪婷. 人工智能训练数据版权侵权风险规制: 欧盟实践、本土困境与解决路径[J]. 德国研究, 2025, 40(1): 82-99, 150-151.
|
|
[11]
|
尹待龙. 人工智能时代文本与数据挖掘著作权例外规则研究[J]. 武汉交通职业学院学报, 2024, 26(2): 51-57.
|
|
[12]
|
张惠彬, 肖启贤. 人工智能时代文本与数据挖掘的版权豁免规则建构[J]. 科技与法律(中英文), 2021(6): 74-84.
|
|
[13]
|
沈廖佳, 龙燕燕. 文本与数据挖掘的著作权风险及其层次化应对——基于生成式人工智能的展开[J]. 中国政法大学研究生学报, 2025(1): 22-45.
|
|
[14]
|
梁远高. 论人工智能大模型训练数据风险的分层规制[J]. 郑州大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2025, 58(3): 61-67, 144.
|