第三人撤销之诉适格原告标准研究

Study on the Qualification Standards for Plaintiffs in the Third-Party Revocation Action

摘要: 我国关于第三人撤销之诉原告适格的观点陈杂，司法实践中也存在着使用混乱的情形，理论和实践中也存在着一定的偏离。所以对于第三人撤销之诉适格原告认定标准需要从司法实践入手。文章第一部分是对立法目的和理论问题进行梳理，第二部分具体展开了我国第三人撤销之诉适格原告的三种类型、法国相关制度的规定。第三部分对于我国最高法院公布的典型案例进行分析。第四部分是提出了第三人撤销之诉适格原告标准的判断思路并且得出结论。

Abstract: In China, there are diverse opinions regarding the standing of plaintiffs in third-party revocation actions, and judicial practice exhibits chaotic application. There is also a certain deviation between theory and practice. Therefore, the criteria for determining qualified plaintiffs in third-party revocation actions need to be examined through the lens of judicial practice. The first part of the article reviews the legislative purpose and theoretical issues. The second part elaborates on the three types of qualified plaintiffs in China’s third-party revocation actions and the relevant provisions of the French legal system. The third part analyzes typical cases published by the Supreme People’s Court of China. The fourth part proposes a framework for determining the criteria for qualified plaintiffs in third-party revocation actions and draws conclusions.