平顶山短时强降水特征及地形增幅作用分析
Analysis of Short-Term Heavy Precipitation Characteristics and Terrain Enhancement Effect in Pingdingshan
DOI: 10.12677/ag.2025.1511141, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 康智国:中国气象局河南省农业气象保障与应用技术重点实验室,河南 郑州;河南省气象台,河南 郑州;胡小玲:中国气象局河南省农业气象保障与应用技术重点实验室,河南 郑州;平顶山市气象局,河南 平顶山
关键词: 平顶山短时强降水地形增幅作用水汽收支方法Pingdingshan Short-Term Heavy Precipitation The Terrain Enhancement Effect Water Vapor Budget Method
摘要: 利用地面逐小时观测资料、ERA5再分析资料、平顶山雷达资料等,分析平顶山短时强降水特征,采用水汽收支方法对一次短时强降水典型天气过程的地形增幅作用机制进行研究,定量化地形降水增幅量。结果表明:1) 平顶山短时强降水频次和最大小时降水量均呈“南多北少、西多东少”的分布特征,与地形密切相关,鲁山山区短时强降水发生频次比周围要多5~10次,80 mm/h以上的站点多出现在鲁山境内的伏牛山山脉迎风坡的喇叭口区域;2) 短时强降水站次最多的年份为2021年,小时降水量在20~30 mm之间的站次占比均超过50%以上,短时强降水发生时间的日变化呈明显的双峰特征,峰值出现在午后(14~16时)和凌晨(00~02时);3) 2021年8月22日天气过程受副热带高压减弱南退配合低槽东移共同影响并叠加中尺度配合倒槽顶部的辐合作用,为大暴雨天气提供了充足的动力条件;4) 低层的偏东气流在地形阻滞抬升作用下,触发对流生成,雷达图上表现为强回波带稳定少动,形成准静止型回波,造成鲁山南部局地出现大暴雨;5) 伏牛山迎风坡地形降水增幅量可达20 mm以上,是实况累积量的30%,局地超过60%。
Abstract: By utilizing ground hourly observation data, ERA5 reanalysis data, and Pingdingshan radar data, this study analyzes the characteristics of short-time heavy rainfall in Pingdingshan. The water vapor budget method is employed to investigate the terrain enhancement mechanism of a typical short-time heavy rainfall event, achieving a quantitative assessment of terrain-induced precipitation enhancement. The results show that: 1) The frequency and maximum hourly precipitation of short-term heavy precipitation in Pingdingshan both exhibit a spatial distribution pattern of “more in the south and less in the north, more in the west and less in the east”. And it’s closely related to topography. The frequency in the Lushan mountainous area is 5~10 times higher than in surrounding regions, and stations recording hourly precipitation exceeding 80 mm/h are mostly located in the “trumpet-shaped” windward slope area of the Funiu Mountains; 2) The highest number of stations experiencing short-term heavy precipitation was in 2021. Station occurrences with hourly precipitation between 20~30 mm accounted for over 50% of all years. The daily variation of short-term heavy precipitation shows a distinct bimodal pattern, with peaks occurring in the afternoon (14:00~16:00) and early morning (00:00~02:00); 3) The weather process on August 22, 2021 was affected by the weakening and southward retreat of the subtropical high and the eastward movement of the low trough, and superimposed with the convergence of the mesoscale and the top of the inverted trough, which provided sufficient dynamic conditions for the heavy rainstorm weather; 4) Low-level easterly flows, obstructed and lifted by terrain, triggered convective development. Radar showed a persistent and quasi-stationary strong echo band, leading to localized heavy rainfall in southern Lushan; 5) The terrain precipitation increment on the windward slope of the Funiu Mountains can exceed 20 mm, accounting for 30% of the observed accumulated precipitation, and locally exceeding 60%.
文章引用:康智国, 胡小玲. 平顶山短时强降水特征及地形增幅作用分析[J]. 地球科学前沿, 2025, 15(11): 1521-1530. https://doi.org/10.12677/ag.2025.1511141

参考文献

[1] Luo, Y., Wu, M., Ren, F., Li, J. and Wong, W. (2016) Synoptic Situations of Extreme Hourly Precipitation over China. Journal of Climate, 29, 8703-8719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Wu, M., Wu, C., Yen, T. and Luo, Y. (2017) Synoptic Analysis of Extreme Hourly Precipitation in Taiwan Region during 2003-12. Monthly Weather Review, 145, 5123-5140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] 寿绍文. 中国暴雨的天气学研究进展[J]. 暴雨灾害, 2019, 38(5): 450-463.
[4] Romatschke, U. and Houze, R.A. (2010) Extreme Summer Convection in South America. Journal of Climate, 23, 3761-3791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] 苏爱芳, 席乐, 吕晓娜, 等. 豫北“21∙7”极端暴雨过程特征及成因分析[J]. 气象, 2022, 48(5): 556-570.
[6] 孙继松. 气流的垂直分布对地形雨落区的影响[J]. 高原气象, 2005, 24(1): 62-69.
[7] 杨侃, 纪晓玲, 毛璐, 等. 贺兰山两次特大致洪暴雨的数值模拟与地形影响对比[J]. 干旱气象, 2020, 38(4): 581-590.
[8] 李侃, 戴晶晶, 彭义峰, 等. 江西中西部地区一次暴雨过程的地形敏感性试验[J]. 暴雨灾害, 2014, 33(4): 386-391.
[9] 武文婧, 翟丹华. 基于数值模拟对重庆西部地区一次强对流天气过程的成因分析[J]. 气象与环境科学, 2021, 44(5): 57-63.
[10] 张启绍. 河南“21∙7”极端暴雨过程地形敏感性试验[J]. 河南科学, 2023, 41(3): 398-407.
[11] 李青春, 程丛兰, 全继萍, 等. 夏季两次不同强度暴雨过程的低空急流特征及其作用对比分析[J]. 气象, 2022, 48(11): 1384-1401.
[12] 汪小康, 崔春光, 王婧羽, 等. “21∙7”河南特大暴雨水汽和急流特征诊断分析[J]. 气象, 2022, 48(5): 533-544.
[13] 李国翠, 钤伟妙, 车少静, 等. “21∙7”特大暴雨系统北上引发太行山中段区域大暴雨成因分析[J]. 高原气象, 2023, 42(5): 1260-1270.
[14] 刘裕禄, 杜其成, 黄勇. 黄山地区短时强降雨的地形增幅机制[J]. 气象, 2017, 43(2): 181-188.
[15] 林慧敏, 闵锦忠, 朱利剑, 等. 太行山地形在“7∙19”华北持续性低涡暴雨中的作用[J]. 气象科学, 2023, 43(1): 46-58.
[16] 王玉. 太行山东麓短时强降水的模拟研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 南京: 南京信息工程大学, 2023.
[17] 康延臻. 太行山及以东邻近地区典型强降水过程的成因和中尺度特征研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2021.
[18] 段中夏. 豫西南一次春季暴雨过程成因及偏差分析[J]. 内蒙古气象, 2022(5): 3-9.
[19] 苏爱芳, 张宁, 袁小超, 等. 豫西南一次局地大暴雨中尺度对流系统的结构特征分析[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2018, 34(6): 1-10.
[20] 杨群, 向楠, 冉光镜, 等. 梵净山突发特大暴雨地形作用及动热力特征分析[J]. 沙漠与绿洲气象, 2024, 18(6): 55-63.
[21] 胡振菊, 黎璐, 黄小玉, 等. 一次典型东风波极端暴雨的中尺度特征及地形影响分析[J]. 干旱气象, 2022, 40(1): 73-83.