生态补偿政策对产业结构升级的影响——基于多期DID方法
The Impact of Ecological Compensation Policy on Industrial Structure Upgrading—Based on the Multi-Period DID Method
DOI: 10.12677/jlce.2025.144036, PDF,   
作者: 区鸿景：广东财经大学金融学院，广东 广州；李雄英：广东财经大学统计与数据科学学院，广东 广州；周君佐：广东财经大学教务处，广东 广州
关键词: 生态补偿；产业结构升级；DID；Ecological Compensation； Industrial Structure Upgrading； DID
摘要: 通过生态补偿政策优化产业结构是解决生态与经济问题的重要措施。目前现有的文献主要集中在对于生态补偿的定性研究上，缺乏定量的研究。因此，为了实现经济与社会的可持续发展，有必要对生态补偿的经济效应进行进一步探究。本文选取10个流域2000~2021的年度面板数据，构建双重差分模型，加入科技创新与资源依赖度两个中介变量，探究生态补偿政策对产业结构升级的影响。研究的结果表明：生态补偿政策的实施，提高了产业科技的创新能力，减少了对资源的依赖度，促进了产业结构的合理化与高级化。并且进行了异质性分析，表明生态补偿政策的地区化差异。最后，本文为产业升级，生态补偿以及相关政策的调整提供了政策建议。
Abstract: Optimizing the industrial structure through ecological compensation policies is an important measure to solve ecological and economic problems. The existing literature currently focuses on qualitative research on ecological compensation, and lacks quantitative research. Therefore, in order to achieve sustainable economic and social development, it is necessary to further explore the economic effects of ecological compensation. This paper selects annual panel data from 10 river basins from 2000 to 2021, constructs a double difference model, and adds two mediating variables, scientific and technological innovation and resource dependence, to explore the impact of ecological compensation policies on industrial structure upgrading. The results of the study show that the implementation of the ecological compensation policy has improved the innovation ability of industrial science and technology, reduced dependence on resources, and promoted the rationalization and upgrading of the industrial structure. A heterogeneity analysis was also conducted, which showed regional differences in ecological compensation policies. Finally, this paper provides policy recommendations for industrial upgrading, ecological compensation and adjustments to related policies.
文章引用：区鸿景, 李雄英, 周君佐. 生态补偿政策对产业结构升级的影响——基于多期DID方法[J]. 低碳经济, 2025, 14(4): 344-356. https://doi.org/10.12677/jlce.2025.144036

参考文献

[1] 俞海, 任勇. 中国生态补偿: 概念、问题类型与政策路径选择[J]. 中国软科学, 2008(6): 7-15.
[2] 刘桂环, 文一惠, 谢婧, 饶胜. 完善国家主体功能区框架下生态保护补偿政策的思考[J]. 环境保护, 2015, 43(23): 39-42.
[3] 孙璇, 曾菊新, 陈四云, 杨振, 罗静. 顾及生态损益的生态补偿支付次序研究——以湖北省为例[J]. 经济地理, 2018, 38(5): 170-178.
[4] Pigou, A. (2017) The Economics of Welfare. Routledge.
[5] Samuelson, P.A. (1954) The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 36, 387-389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[6] 李晓光, 苗鸿, 郑华, 等. 机会成本法在确定生态补偿标准中的应用——以海南中部山区为例[J]. 生态报, 2009, 29(9): 4875-4883.
[7] Pagiola, S., Ramírez, E., Gobbi, J., de Haan, C., Ibrahim, M., Murgueitio, E., et al. (2007) Paying for the Environmental Services of Silvopastoral Practices in Nicaragua. Ecological Economics, 64, 374-385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[8] 张伊华. 基于机会成本法和生态系统服务价值核算的水资源生态补偿标准研究——以黄河流域为例[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2023, 42(5): 108-114.
[9] Bennett, M.T., Gong, Y. and Scarpa, R. (2018) Hungry Birds and Angry Farmers: Using Choice Experiments to Assess “Eco-Compensation” for Coastal Wetlands Protection in China. Ecological Economics, 154, 71-87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[10] 吴娜, 宋晓谕, 康文慧, 等. 不同视角下基于InVEST模型的流域生态补偿标准核算——以渭河甘肃段为例[J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(7): 2512-2522.
[11] 钟绍峰. 关于产业结构调整中的生态补偿问题[J]. 新长征, 2010(5): 22-23.
[12] 李芳林, 张海斌. 基于生态足迹法的镇江市产业结构调整研究[J]. 技术经济与管理研究, 2011(5): 113-116.
[13] 许晴. 基于VAR模型的产业结构对生态足迹的影响研究——以吉林省为例[J]. 经济视角(上), 2013(1): 48-52.
[14] 高广阔, 郭毯, 吴世昌. 长三角地区生态补偿与产业结构优化研究[J]. 上海经济研究, 2016(6): 73-85+92.
[15] Peneder, M. (2003) Industrial Structure and Aggregate Growth. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 14, 427-448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[16] Cheng, Z., Li, L. and Liu, J. (2017) The Emissions Reduction Effect and Technical Progress Effect of Environmental Regulation Policy Tools. Journal of Cleaner Production, 149, 191-205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[17] Gu, D. and Xu, X.J. (2020) The Influence of Industrial Structure Optimization and Upgrading on Ecological Efficiency in China. Ecological Economics, 36, 58-67.
[18] Peng, B., Tu, Y., Elahi, E. and Wei, G. (2018) Extended Producer Responsibility and Corporate Performance: Effects of Environmental Regulation and Environmental Strategy. Journal of Environmental Management, 218, 181-189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] 谭静, 张建华. 碳交易机制倒逼产业结构升级了吗?——基于合成控制法的分析[J]. 经济与管理研究, 2018, 39(12): 104-119.
[20] Dwumfour, R.A. and Ntow-Gyamfi, M. (2018) Natural Resources, Financial Development and Institutional Quality in Africa: Is There a Resource Curse? Resources Policy, 59, 411-426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[21] Gylfason, T. (2001) Natural Resources, Education, and Economic Development. European Economic Review, 45, 847-859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[22] Kuznets, S. (1971) Economic Growth of Nations: Total Output and Production Structure. Harvard University Press.
[23] 干春晖, 郑若谷, 余典范. 中国产业结构变迁对经济增长和波动的影响[J]. 经济研究, 2011, 46(5): 4-16+31.
[24] Zheng, Q., Wan, L., Wang, S., Wang, C. and Fang, W. (2021) Does Ecological Compensation Have a Spillover Effect on Industrial Structure Upgrading? Evidence from China Based on a Multi-Stage Dynamic DID Approach. Journal of Environmental Management, 294, Article ID: 112934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

为你推荐