ESG表现和技术创新对中原城市群企业财务绩效的影响研究
Study on the Impact of ESG Performance and Technological Innovation on the Financial Performance of Enterprises in the Central Plains Urban Agglomeration
DOI: 10.12677/sa.2025.1411304, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 郭新宜, 李旭珂, 白秀琴, 范国锋:平顶山学院数学与统计学院,河南 平顶山
关键词: 中原城市群ESG技术创新企业财务绩效Central Plains Urban Agglomeration ESG Technological Innovation Corporate Financial Performance
摘要: 在区域经济高质量发展政策推进与中原城市群产业升级的双重背景下,探究企业ESG实践对财务绩效的影响及作用机制,对引导区域企业可持续发展具有重要意义。本文选取2015~2023年中原城市群A股上市公司面板数据,采用基准回归模型和中介模型系统考察ESG表现、技术创新与企业财务绩效的关系。研究发现:企业ESG表现改善能显著正向提升财务绩效,且通过替换解释变量和被解释变量的稳健性检验后,该结论依然成立。机制检验证实,用公司专利表示的技术创新在ESG表现与财务绩效间发挥部分中介作用。且发明专利的中介效应弱于非发明专利。异质性分析表明,ESG表现对财务绩效的正向影响在非国有企业、小型企业和重污染企业中更为突出。据此提出“完善区域ESG专项政策、强化中小企业ESG创新支持”等针对性政策建议,为中原城市群企业高质量发展提供参考。
Abstract: Against the dual backdrop of the advancement of regional high-quality economic development policies and the industrial upgrading of the Central Plains Urban Agglomeration, exploring the impact of enterprises’ ESG practices on financial performance and their operational mechanisms holds significant importance for guiding the sustainable development of regional enterprises. This study selects panel data of A-share listed companies in the Central Plains Urban Agglomeration from 2015 to 2023, and systematically examines the relationships among ESG performance, technological innovation, and corporate financial performance using benchmark regression models and mediating models. The findings reveal that the improvement of enterprises’ ESG performance can significantly and positively enhance financial performance, and this conclusion remains valid after robustness tests involving the replacement of explanatory variables and explained variables. Mechanism tests confirm that technological innovation, measured by corporate patents, plays a partial mediating role between ESG performance and financial performance, with the mediating effect of invention patents being weaker than that of non-invention patents. Heterogeneity analysis indicates that the positive impact of ESG performance on financial performance is more prominent in non-state-owned enterprises, small-sized enterprises, and heavily polluting enterprises. Based on these findings, targeted policy recommendations are proposed, such as “improving regional ESG-specific policies and strengthening ESG innovation support for small and medium-sized enterprises,” to provide references for the high-quality development of enterprises in the Central Plains Urban Agglomeration.
文章引用:郭新宜, 李旭珂, 白秀琴, 范国锋. ESG表现和技术创新对中原城市群企业财务绩效的影响研究[J]. 统计学与应用, 2025, 14(11): 1-10. https://doi.org/10.12677/sa.2025.1411304

参考文献

[1] 王妮, 潘海英, 吴雨濛, 等. ESG表现、创新投资决策与企业价值[J]. 研究与发展管理, 2024, 36(4): 88-100.
[2] 冯启良, 安琪, 方炜. 关键核心技术创新对企业市场价值的影响研究[J]. 科研管理, 2024, 45(10): 24-33.
[3] 李井林, 杨洪杰. ESG与公司财务: 研究评述和展望[J]. 会计之友, 2023(15): 69-74.
[4] 张长江, 张玥, 陈雨晴. ESG表现、投资者信心与上市公司绩效[J]. 环境经济研究, 2021, 6(4): 22-39.
[5] Duque-Grisales, E. and Aguilera-Caracuel, J. (2021) Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Scores and Financial Performance of Multilatinas: Moderating Effects of Geographic International Diversification and Financial Slack. Journal of Business Ethics, 168, 315-334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] 聂淼晶, 张新华. “双碳”目标下绿色技术创新对企业财务绩效的影响[J]. 财经理论与实践, 2025, 46(2): 90-98.
[7] 杨惠贤, 张炜晗. 能源企业技术创新能力对财务绩效的影响——基于企业规模的门槛效应研究[J]. 技术经济, 2020, 39(8): 1-9+34.
[8] 谢晓佳, 坚瑞. 环境、社会和公司治理(ESG)促进企业激进式绿色技术创新的作用机制[J]. 科技管理研究, 2024, 44(20): 197-210.
[9] 孙梅, 李文勤. 技术创新、内部控制与企业ESG表现[J]. 经济问题, 2025(8): 96-103.
[10] 王彦武. 中原城市群几个问题的探讨[J]. 中州学刊, 2004(5): 36-40.
[11] 尹翀, 丁青艳, 杨振亚, 等. 中原城市群产业技术扩散机制与创新协同效应[J]. 科技管理研究, 2021, 41(20): 35-43.
[12] 解学梅, 朱琪玮. 企业绿色创新实践如何破解“和谐共生”难题? [J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(1): 128-149.
[13] 舒欢, 叶南客, 邹维. 企业社会责任承担与经营风险——来自上市工程企业的证据[J]. 社会科学, 2022(12): 119-130.
[14] 张多蕾, 胡公瑾. 企业社会责任、投资者异质信念与融资约束[J]. 商业研究, 2020(9): 132-141.
[15] 张军, 刘波, 沈华玉. 股价同步性与股价崩盘风险——基于信息不对称和公司治理视角[J]. 财经科学, 2019(4): 13-25.
[16] 高尚, 陈宁, 李瑞峰. 中药企业公司治理、社会责任和财务绩效的研究[J]. 中国医药导报, 2019(11): 177.
[17] 黄永春, 林地, 吴商硕, 等. ESG表现、研发投入与双元创新[J]. 资源与产业, 2024, 26(4): 75-90.
[18] 褚淑贞, 都兰娜. 基于CDM模型的创新投入、创新产出与企业创新绩效关系研究——以医药制造业上市公司为例[J]. 工业技术经济, 2017, 36(7): 136-142.