心理咨询督导中受督导者依恋的影响研究
A Study on the Impact of Supervisee Attachment in Psychological Counseling Supervision
DOI: 10.12677/ap.2025.1511585, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 廖 佳：中国民用航空飞行学院学生心理健康中心，四川 成都
关键词: 心理咨询；督导；受督导者依恋；影响作用；Counseling Psychology； Supervision； Supervisee Attachment； Influence
摘要: 督导是临床心理咨询中保障来访者福祉与促进咨询师专业发展的关键机制。受督导者的依恋风格作为重要的个体变量，深刻影响督导关系、过程与结果，并延伸至咨询过程及咨询师自身的专业成长。本文系统梳理了受督导者依恋的影响作用，主要体现在三个层面：在督导层面，受督导者依恋风格显著影响督导关系、督导工作同盟、被督导者的自我暴露行为及督导结果；在咨询层面，其影响涉及咨询工作同盟、咨询关系与专业行为、共情能力与反移情觉察、咨询效能及会谈深度；在咨询师个人层面，则关联其职业发展水平、幸福感与心理韧性。展望未来，研究建议应立足中国文化背景，考察权威取向等文化因素对受督导者依恋的独特塑造作用，开发本土化的有效测量工具，深化对其作用机制的探索，并发展针对性督导干预策略，以削弱不安全依恋的潜在负面影响，最终提升临床督导与咨询服务的质量，推动心理健康服务行业的专业化发展。
Abstract: Clinical supervision serves as a critical mechanism in safeguarding client welfare and fostering the professional development of counselors. The supervisee’s attachment style, as a significant individual variable, exerts a profound influence on the supervisory relationship, process, and outcomes, with effects extending to the counseling process and the counselor’s own professional growth. This article systematically reviews the impact of supervisee attachment, which manifests primarily across three dimensions: at the supervisory level, it significantly affects the supervisory relationship, the supervisory working alliance, the supervisee’s self-disclosure behaviors, and supervisory outcomes; at the counseling level, its impact involves the counseling working alliance, the therapeutic relationship and professional conduct, empathy and countertransference awareness, counseling efficacy, and session depth; at the individual counselor level, it is linked to professional development, well-being, and psychological resilience. Future research should be grounded in the Chinese cultural context to investigate the unique shaping influence of cultural factors such as authority orientation on supervisee attachment, develop localized and valid measurement tools, deepen the exploration of its underlying mechanisms, and formulate targeted supervisory intervention strategies. These efforts aim to mitigate the potential negative effects of insecure attachment, thereby ultimately enhancing the quality of clinical supervision and counseling services and advancing the professionalization of the mental health services industry.
文章引用：廖佳 (2025). 心理咨询督导中受督导者依恋的影响研究. 心理学进展, 15(11), 109-118. https://doi.org/10.12677/ap.2025.1511585

参考文献

[1] 李驰, 刘静远, 李焰(2022). 依恋焦虑对心理咨询师性吸引经历的影响: 性态度开放性与性吸引态度的链式中介效应. 中国临床心理学杂志, 30(5), 1086-1090.
[2] 刘伟, 申荷永, 王晓寅, 潘运(2014). 心理咨询师的成人依恋、情绪体验和共情能力的关系研究. 中国临床心理学杂志, 22(3), 552-554+559.
[3] 刘新春, 朱晓坤, 邓晶晶, 李永玲, 杨丽(2013). 完美主义在依恋和抑郁间的中介效应研究. 中国临床心理学杂志, 21(4), 658-661.
[4] 吴梦阳, 朱虹, 吴冉(2018). 多角度探索咨询师依恋表现及其对工作联盟的影响. 教育教学论坛, (33), 213-214.
[5] 徐梦飞, 侯志瑾, 李栩, 王丹妮, 钱捷(2017). 心理咨询中的依恋关系研究综述. 中国临床心理学杂志, 25(2), 319-325.
[6] 杨国枢(2004). 中国人的心理与行为: 本土化研究. 中国人民大学出版社.
[7] 赵静波, 季建林, 程文红, 张柏芳, 张岚, 付深省(2010). 心理咨询和治疗师的受虐待经历与其伦理行为的关系. 中国临床心理学杂志, 18(2), 266-268.
[8] 周蜜, 贾晓明, 赵嘉璐(2015). 心理咨询督导关系中的权威特征. 中国心理卫生杂志, 29(12), 908-913.
[9] Armoutliev, E. M. (2013). Attachment, Supervisory Style and Caregiving in Clinical Supervisors. The University of Akron.
[10] Bennett, C. S. (2008). Attachment-Informed Supervision for Social Work Field Education. Clinical Social Work Journal, 36, 97-107.[CrossRef] 
[11] Bernard, J. M., & Goodyear, R. K. (2009). Fundamentals of Clinical Supervision (4th ed.). Pearson.
[12] Black, S., Hardy, G., Turpin, G., & Parry, G. (2005). Self‐Reported Attachment Styles and Therapeutic Orientation of Therapists and Their Relationship with Reported General Alliance Quality and Problems in Therapy. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 78, 363-377.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Borders, D. A., Glosoff, H. L., Welfare, L. E., Hays, D. G., Dekruyf, L., & Fernando, D. M. (2014). Best Practices in Clinical Supervision: Evolution of a Counseling Specialty. Clinical Supervisor, 33, 26-44.
[14] Bowlby, J. (1960). Separation Anxiety. The International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 41, 89-113.
[15] Bowlby, J. (2008). A Secure Base: Parent-Child Attachment and Healthy Human Development. Basic Books.
[16] Brennan, K. A., Clark, C. L., & Shaver, P. R. (1998). Self-Report Measurement of Adult Attachment: An Integrative Overview. In J. A. Simpson, & W. S. Rholes (Eds.), Attachment Theory and Close Relationships (pp. 46-76). Guilford.
[17] Carvalho, H., Nata, G., & Mena Matos, P. (2024). How Secure Is the Secure Base? Romantic Attachment, Emotion Regulation, and Psychotherapists’ Role as Secure Base Figures. Research in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process and Outcome, 27, Article 733.
[18] Collins, N. L. (1996). Working Models of Attachment: Implications for Explanation, Emotion, and Behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 810-832.[CrossRef] 
[19] Cook, R. M., & Welfare, L. E. (2018). Examining Predictors of Counselor‐in-Training Intentional Nondisclosure. Counselor Education and Supervision, 57, 211-226.[CrossRef] 
[20] Deal, K. H., Bennett, S., Mohr, J., & Hwang, J. (2011). Effects of Field Instructor Training on Student Competencies and the Supervisory Alliance. Research on Social Work Practice, 21, 712-726.[CrossRef] 
[21] Diener, M. J., & Monroe, J. M. (2011). The Relationship between Adult Attachment Style and Therapeutic Alliance in Individual Psychotherapy: A Meta-Analytic Review. Psychotherapy, 48, 237-248.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Dozier, M., Cue, K. L., & Barnett, L. (1994). Clinicians as Caregivers: Role of Attachment Organization in Treatment. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 793-800.[CrossRef] 
[23] Foster, J. T., Lichtenberg, J. W., & Peyton, V. (2007). The Supervisory Attachment Relationship as a Predictor of the Professional Development of the Supervisee. Psychotherapy Research, 17, 343-350.[CrossRef] 
[24] Fraley, R. C., & Waller, N. G. (1998). Adult Attachment Patterns: A Test of the Typological Model. In J. A. Simpson, & W. S. Rholes (Eds.), Attachment Theory and Close Relationships (pp. 77-114). Guilford Press.
[25] Fraley, R. C., Heffernan, M. E., Vicary, A. M., & Brumbaugh, C. C. (2011). The Experiences in Close Relationships—Relationship Structures Questionnaire: A Method for Assessing Attachment Orientations across Relationships. Psychological Assessment, 23, 615-625.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] Fredricks, A. (2018). Attachment Theory as a Framework for Supervision of Supervisors-in-Training. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Denver.
[27] Fuertes, J. N., Moore, M., & Ganley, J. (2019). Therapists’ and Clients’ Ratings of Real Relationship, Attachment, Therapist Self-Disclosure, and Treatment Progress. Psychotherapy Research, 29, 594-606.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[28] Gibson, A. S., Ellis, M. V., & Friedlander, M. L. (2019). Toward a Nuanced Understanding of Nondisclosure in Psychotherapy Supervision. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 66, 114-121.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[29] Gunn, J. E., & Pistole, M. C. (2012). Trainee Supervisor Attachment: Explaining the Alliance and Disclosure in Supervision. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 6, 229-237.[CrossRef] 
[30] Hiebler‐Ragger, M., Nausner, L., Blaha, A., Grimmer, K., Korlath, S., Mernyi, M. et al. (2021). The Supervisory Relationship from an Attachment Perspective: Connections to Burnout and Sense of Coherence in Health Professionals. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 28, 124-136.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[31] Horvath, A. O., & Greenberg, L. S. (1989). Development and Validation of the Working Alliance Inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 36, 223-233.[CrossRef] 
[32] Huang, S. Y. (2024). Interpersonal Process Recall in Supervision: Addressing Anxious Attachment. Journal of Counselor Preparation and Supervision, 18, 1-15.[CrossRef] 
[33] Hudson, P. (2022). Counseling Supervision Modality and the Supervisory Working Alliance in Pre-Licensed Supervisees. Doctoral Dissertation, Regent University.
[34] Hurless, N. (2021). The Role of Counseling Trainee Adversity, Attachment Style, and Trauma-Informed Principles in Clinical Supervision. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Missouri-St. Louis.
[35] Kivlighan Jr, D. M., & Marmarosh, C. L. (2018). Counselors’ Attachment Anxiety and Avoidance and the Congruence in Clients’ and Therapists’ Working Alliance Ratings. Psychotherapy Research, 28, 571-580.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[36] Levy, K. N., & Johnson, B. N. (2019). Attachment and Psychotherapy: Implications from Empirical Research. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne, 60, 178-193.[CrossRef] 
[37] Mammen, M. A. (2020). Attachment Dynamics in the Supervisory Relationship: Becoming Your Own Good Supervisor. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 30, 93-101.[CrossRef] 
[38] Marmarosh, C. L., Kivlighan Jr, D. M., Bieri, K., LaFauci Schutt, J. M., Barone, C., & Choi, J. (2014). The Insecure Psychotherapy Base: Using Client and Therapist Attachment Styles to Understand the Early Alliance. Psychotherapy, 51, 404-412.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[39] Marmarosh, C. L., Nikityn, M., Moehringer, J., Ferraioli, L., Kahn, S., Cerkevich, A. et al. (2013). Adult Attachment, Attachment to the Supervisor, and the Supervisory Alliance: How They Relate to Novice Therapists’ Perceived Counseling Self-Efficacy. Psychotherapy, 50, 178-188.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[40] Marmarosh, C. L., Schmidt, E., Pembleton, J., Rotbart, E., Muzyk, N., Liner, A. et al. (2015). Novice Therapist Attachment and Perceived Ruptures and Repairs: A Pilot Study. Psychotherapy, 52, 140-144.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[41] McKibben, W. B., & Webber, W. B. (2017). Investigating the Impact of Supervisee Attachment System Activation on the Supervisory Relationship. The Clinical Supervisor, 36, 324-339.[CrossRef] 
[42] McKibben, W. B., Borders, L. D., & Wahesh, E. (2019). Factors Influencing Supervisee Perceptions of Critical Feedback Validity. Counselor Education and Supervision, 58, 242-256.[CrossRef] 
[43] McKibben, W. B., Lenz, A. S., & Sheperis, D. (2023). A Meta‐Analysis of Supervisee Attachment Style and the Supervisory Relationship. Journal of Counseling & Development, 101, 323-333.[CrossRef] 
[44] Mehr, K. E., Ladany, N., & Caskie, G. I. L. (2015). Factors Influencing Trainee Willingness to Disclose in Supervision. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 9, 44-51.[CrossRef] 
[45] Menefee, D. S., Day, S. X., Lopez, F. G., & McPherson, R. H. (2014). Preliminary Development and Validation of the Supervisee Attachment Strategies Scale (SASS). Journal of Counseling Psychology, 61, 232-240.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[46] Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2003). The Attachment Behavioral System in Adulthood: Activation, Psychodynamics, and Interpersonal Processes. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 35) (pp. 53-152). Academic Press.
[47] Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2007). Boosting Attachment Security to Promote Mental Health, Prosocial Values, and Inter-Group Tolerance. Psychological Inquiry, 18, 139-156.[CrossRef] 
[48] Mikulincer, M., Shaver, P. R., & Pereg, D. (2003). Attachment Theory and Affect Regulation: The Dynamics, Development, and Cognitive Consequences of Attachment-Related Strategies. Motivation and Emotion, 27, 77-102.[CrossRef] 
[49] Mohr, J. J., Gelso, C. J., & Hill, C. E. (2005). Client and Counselor Trainee Attachment as Predictors of Session Evaluation and Countertransference Behavior in First Counseling Sessions. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 298-309.[CrossRef] 
[50] Nanna, G. H. (2019). Relationship between Novice Counselors’ Supervisory Attachments and Boundary Practices and Perceptions. Doctoral Dissertation, Walden University.
[51] Negrini, L. S. (2018). Handbook of Attachment, Third Edition: Theory, Research, and Clinical Applications Jude Cassidy and Phillip R. Shaver (eds.), New York: Guilford Press, 2016, 1,068 Pp., ISBN 978-1-4625-2529-4. Infant Mental Health Journal, 39, 618-620.[CrossRef] 
[52] Oh, H. H., & Lee, Y. A. (2020). The Mediating Effect of Self-Disclosure on the Relationship between Supervisees’ Attachment Strategies and Supervision Satisfaction. Korean Journal of Play Therapy, 23, 55-72.[CrossRef] 
[53] Pan, Y. (2024). The Interplay of Feedback Literacy, Attachment Anxiety, and Supervisory Working Alliance in Influencing Supervisees’ Emotional Response and Likelihood of Using Supervisory Feedback. The University of North Carolina at Greensboro.
[54] Park, M. J., & Jin, M. K. (2021). The Moderating Effects of Supervisee Attachment Strategies between Evaluative Concerns Perfectionism and Psychological Burnout Amongst Play Therapists. Korean Journal of Play Therapy, 24, 103-119.[CrossRef] 
[55] Petrowski, K., Pokorny, D., Nowacki, K., & Buchheim, A. (2013). The Therapist’s Attachment Representation and the Patient’s Attachment to the Therapist. Psychotherapy Research, 23, 25-34.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[56] Pistole, M. C., & Watkins, C. E. (1995). Attachment Theory, Counseling Process, and Supervision. The Counseling Psychologist, 23, 457-478.[CrossRef] 
[57] Rogers, J. L., Luke, M., Gilbride, D. D., & Goodrich, K. M. (2019). Supervisee Attachment, Cognitive Distortions, and Difficulty with Corrective Feedback. Counselor Education and Supervision, 58, 18-32.[CrossRef] 
[58] Rubino, G., Barker, C., Roth, T., & Fearon, P. (2000). Therapist Empathy and Depth of Interpretation in Response to Potential Alliance Ruptures: The Role of Therapist and Patient Attachment Styles. Psychotherapy Research, 10, 408-420.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[59] Sauer, E. M., Lopez, F. G., & Gormley, B. (2003). Respective Contributions of Therapist and Client Adult Attachment Orientations to the Development of the Early Working Alliance: A Preliminary Growth Modeling Study. Psychotherapy Research, 13, 371-382.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[60] Shin, S., Park, Y., Kim, Y., & Park, M. (2016). A Development and Validation of the Korean Version of the Supervisee Attachment Strategies Scale. The Korean Journal of Counseling and Psychotherapy, 28, 615-636.[CrossRef] 
[61] Son, E. (2019). The Influence of Supervisees’ Insecure Attachment and Role Conflict on Supervisory Working Alliance: The Moderated Mediation Effect of Experience Level. The Korean Journal of Counseling and Psychotherapy, 31, 827-847.[CrossRef] 
[62] Son, E., Ellis, M. V., & Hutman, H. (2022). Supervisees’ Nondisclosure in South Korea and the United States: A Cross-Cultural Comparison. The Counseling Psychologist, 50, 450-476.[CrossRef] 
[63] Volk, B. E. (2023). Insecure Attachment in Clinical Supervisory Relationships: Balancing Personal with Professional. Master’s Dissertation, University of Alberta.
[64] Watkins, C. E., Budge, S. L., & Callahan, J. L. (2015). Common and Specific Factors Converging in Psychotherapy Supervision: A Supervisory Extrapolation of the Wampold/Budge Psychotherapy Relationship Model. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 25, 214-235.[CrossRef] 
[65] Wei, M., Liao, K. Y., Ku, T., & Shaffer, P. A. (2011). Attachment, Self-Compassion, Empathy, and Subjective Well-Being among College Students and Community Adults. Journal of Personality, 79, 191-221.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[66] Wierda, K. (2016). Exploring Interpersonal Variables within the Supervisory Relationship: The Role of Supervisory Alliance, Supervisory Style, and Supervisee Attachment. Ph.D. Thesis, Western Michigan University.
[67] Wrape, E. R., Callahan, J. L., Rieck, T., & Watkins Jr, C. E. (2017). Attachment Theory within Clinical Supervision: Application of the Conceptual to the Empirical. Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy, 31, 37-54.[CrossRef]