物体系的形成与欲望的填充——鲍德里亚意识形态批判解读
The Formation of the Object System and the Satisfaction of Desire—On Baudrillard’s Ideological Critique
DOI: 10.12677/acpp.2025.1411563, PDF,   
作者: 李婧娴:贵州大学哲学学院,贵州 贵阳
关键词: 物体系意识形态欲望鲍德里亚System of Objects Ideology Desire Baudrillard
摘要: 物体系是鲍德里亚消费社会理论中的关键议题,也是他展开意识形态批判的核心内容。物体系的形成,从思想史的角度看,受到了以拉康“大他者”为代表的思想的影响,沿着主体消解的逻辑,展现了作为符号的物的操纵下主体的结构化历程。消费社会中建构起的物体系,以其特有的意义价值,代替人成为诱导人做出价值选择、进行消费行为的真正的主体。通过对物体系功能及其转变的阐述,和对日常生活中各种典型事例的深刻剖析,鲍德里亚揭示出现实的异化和物体系的意识形态性,指出物体系以及它背后的资本正在以难以察觉的形式将人们引入超真实的世界,以此吸纳真实世界带来的焦虑,填充人们借以自我确证的欲望,在不断地制造欲望、满足欲望的过程中,物体系的意识形态价值发挥得淋漓尽致,资本也始终握有不会被挑战的权威。
Abstract: The system of objects is a central theme in Jean Baudrillard’s theory of consumer society and a core element of his ideological critique. From the perspective of intellectual history, the formation of the system of objects was influenced by ideas such as Lacan’s “Big Other”. Following the logic of the dissolution of the subject, it reveals how individuals become structured under the manipulation of objects as signs. In consumer society, the system of objects—endowed with its own signification and value—usurps the role of human agents, becoming the true subject that guides value judgments and consumption behaviors. Through an analysis of the functions and transformations of the system of objects, as well as incisive examinations of typical everyday phenomena, Baudrillard exposes the reality of alienation and the ideological nature of this system. He argues that the system of objects, backed by capital, imperceptibly leads people into a hyperreal world, thereby absorbing anxieties originating from the real world and filling desires through which individuals seek self-validation. In the continual cycle of producing and satisfying desires, the ideological function of the system of objects is fully realized, allowing capital to maintain an unchallenged authority.
文章引用:李婧娴. 物体系的形成与欲望的填充——鲍德里亚意识形态批判解读[J]. 哲学进展, 2025, 14(11): 124-129. https://doi.org/10.12677/acpp.2025.1411563

参考文献

[1] (法)让·鲍德里亚. 消费社会[M]. 刘成富, 全志刚, 译, 南京: 南京大学出版社, 2000.
[2] 马克思, 恩格斯. 马克思恩格斯文集(第5卷) [M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2009: 89.
[3] 仰海峰. 物的嘲讽与主体消亡的宿命: 鲍德里亚的思想主题[J]. 国外社会科学, 2014(5): 118-126.
[4] Jacques Lacan, J. (1977) The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book Ⅺ: The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis. Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psychoanalysis.
[5] (法)拉康. 精神分析中的侵凌性[M]. 褚孝泉, 译, 上海: 上海三联书店, 2001: 97-121.
[6] 孔明安. 物·象征·仿真——鲍德里亚哲学思想研究[M]. 合肥: 安徽师范大学出版社, 2010.
[7] (法)让·鲍德里亚. 物体系[M]. 林志明, 译, 上海: 人民出版社, 2001.
[8] 刘翔. 采取物的立场——让·鲍德里亚的极端反主体主义思想研究[M]. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社, 2012: 70.
[9] (法)让·鲍德里亚. 符号政治经济学批判[M]. 夏莹, 译, 南京: 南京大学出版社, 2009.