黑龙江省乡村旅游韧性与景观格局耦合协调的空间异质性研究
Study on the Spatial Heterogeneity of Coupling Coordination between Rural Tourism Resilience and Landscape Pattern in Heilongjiang Province
摘要: 在乡村振兴与生态文明建设的双重背景下,从生态视角探究乡村旅游的空间格局,对于实现区域可持续发展具有重要意义。本文以黑龙江省4批共49个全国乡村旅游重点村为研究对象,综合运用地理集中指数、核密度分析等空间分析方法,深入探讨了其空间分布特征、集聚模式及内在成因。研究结果表明:黑龙江省乡村旅游重点村在空间上呈显著的集聚型和不均衡分布态势。地理集中指数计算显示,其实际分布密度(G = 31.65)远高于均匀分布状态(G0 = 28.01)。核密度分析进一步揭示了“一核引领、多点散布、北疏南密”的宏观格局:一个高密度核心区集中于西南部的哈尔滨–大庆一带,得益于其优越的区位、经济与交通枢纽地位;中高密度区则围绕区域性中心城市和交通干线呈离散的组团式分布;而广大的北部、东北部地区则因基础设施、经济发展水平等因素制约,成为乡村旅游发展的低密度“洼地”。本研究将景观格局分析与生态旅游适宜性评价相结合,不仅明晰了需优先进行生态保育的区域,也为乡村旅游的生态功能区划提供了科学依据。最终,基于空间异质性特征,提出了针对高密度核心区“提质增效”、中高密度区“强化联动”、低密度区“精准培育与生态保育并重”的差异化发展策略,以增强乡村旅游系统的韧性,为推动黑龙江省乡村旅游的高质量、协调发展提供了理论参考与决策支持。
Abstract: Against the backdrop of both rural revitalization and ecological civilization development, exploring the spatial pattern of rural tourism from an ecological perspective is crucial for achieving sustainable regional development. This study examines 49 national key rural tourism villages from four batches in Heilongjiang Province. Using spatial analysis methods such as the geographic concentration index and kernel density analysis, we delve into their spatial distribution characteristics, agglomeration patterns, and underlying causes. The results indicate that key rural tourism villages in Heilongjiang Province exhibit significant spatial clustering and uneven distribution. The geographic concentration index (G) indicates that their actual distribution density (G = 31.65) is significantly higher than that of a uniform distribution (G0 = 28.01). Kernel density analysis further reveals a macro-pattern of “one core leading, multiple points of distribution, and sparseness in the north and density in the south”: a high-density core area is concentrated in the Harbin-Daqing region in the southwest, benefiting from its advantageous location, economic status, and transportation hub status; medium-and high-density areas are distributed in discrete clusters around regional central cities and transportation arteries; while the vast northern and northeastern regions, constrained by infrastructure and economic development, have become low-density “lowlands” for rural tourism development. This study, combining landscape pattern analysis with ecotourism suitability assessment, not only identifies areas requiring priority ecological conservation but also provides a scientific basis for ecological functional zoning for rural tourism. Finally, based on spatial heterogeneity, differentiated development strategies are proposed: “improving quality and efficiency” in the high-density core area, “strengthening linkages” in the medium-and high-density areas, and “balancing precision cultivation and ecological conservation” in the low-density areas. This strategy aims to enhance the resilience of the rural tourism system and provides theoretical reference and decision-making support for promoting the high-quality and coordinated development of rural tourism in Heilongjiang Province.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
Stronza, A.L., Hunt, C.A. and Fitzgerald, L.A. (2019) Ecotourism for Conservation? Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 44, 229-253.
|
|
[2]
|
张二勋, 谭杨, 张伟, 等. 国内生态旅游经济研究热点及趋势——基于知识图谱的可视化分析[J]. 生态经济, 2021, 37(6): 124-133.
|
|
[3]
|
Wondirad, A. (2017) Who Benefits from the Ecotourism Sector in Southern Ethiopia? International Journal of Tourism Sciences, 17, 276-297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[4]
|
吴吉林, 刘帅, 刘水良. 等. 张家界农户乡村旅游脆弱性评价与影响因素[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 40(8): 1336-1344.
|
|
[5]
|
郭晓东, 张启媛, 马利邦. 山地-丘陵过渡区乡村聚落空间分布特征及其影响因素分析[J]. 经济地理, 2012, 32(10): 1114-120.
|
|
[6]
|
葛全胜, 席建超. 新常态下中国区域旅游发展战略若干思考[J]. 地理科学进展, 2015, 34(7): 793-799.
|
|
[7]
|
邹游, 王梦琪, 李桂媛. 生态视角下旅游活动的环境承载力影响及评价研究——以湖北省随州市为例[J]. 生态经济, 2023, 39(12): 139-146.
|
|
[8]
|
Pike, A., Dawley, S. and Tomaney, J. (2010) Resilience, Adaptation and Adaptability. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 3, 59-70.
|
|
[9]
|
张超玉, 刘毅洁, 贾琦, 等. 流动性视角下的乡村旅游地生活空间韧性重构策略研究[J]. 农业与技术, 2023, 43(18): 114-118.
|
|
[10]
|
Gössling, S. (1999) Ecotourism: A Means to Safeguard Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functions? Ecological Economics, 29, 303-320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|