浅析数字生命延续的现实影响和价值
A Preliminary Analysis of the Practical Impacts and Value of Digital Life Continuation
DOI: 10.12677/jc.2025.1311267, PDF,   
作者: 吴玉娜:河北师范大学新闻传播学院,河北 石家庄
关键词: 数字生命数字世界情感陪伴价值观念Digital Life Digital World Emotional Companionship Values
摘要: 近年来,“数字生命”越来越成为学界热议话题,数字生命计划所展示的对虚拟生命的延续和构想引发人们对虚拟生命的实际影响和价值的深思,虚拟生命作为数字世界中存在的一种生命形式,不仅是科幻作品的构思和幻想,更是引导着人们因其发展而带来的人类社会与科技发展的深入探索。文中数字生命根据概念界定衍生出“数字生命”对现实的影响及价值分为:情感陪伴与数字哀悼、赋能科研与艺术展示、内容传承与历史永存。但科技的发展总是喜忧参半的,数字生命对人类社会的道德观念与价值观念产生了挑战,在对数字生命的使用与日常交互中,也暗藏着“算法黑箱”和“对齐问题”,其连带的伦理风险问题值得我们重点关注。对此,我们应如何看待数字生命的成长?如何利用他、并如何推动其发展?是较长时间内人类面临的重大课题。
Abstract: In recent years, “digital life” has increasingly become a hot topic in academic circles. The Digital Life Project’s vision of sustaining and conceptualizing virtual life has sparked profound reflection on the actual impact and value of virtual life. As a form of existence in the digital world, virtual life is not merely the imagination of science fiction but also a catalyst for deep exploration into the development of human society and technological progress. Furthermore, based on conceptual definitions, the influence and value of “digital life” on reality can be categorized into: emotional companionship and digital mourning, empowering scientific research and artistic expression, as well as content preservation and historical perpetuity. However, technological advancement is always a double-edged sword. In the use and daily interaction with digital life, there are also hidden ‘algorithmic black boxes’ and ‘alignment problems,’ along with associated ethical risks that deserve our close attention. Thus, how we perceive the growth of digital life, how we harness it, and how we advance its development remain critical questions for humanity to address over the long term.
文章引用:吴玉娜. 浅析数字生命延续的现实影响和价值[J]. 新闻传播科学, 2025, 13(11): 1884-1888. https://doi.org/10.12677/jc.2025.1311267

参考文献

[1] 盛昳嵬. 同化与异化的双重效应: 数字生命的存在论逻辑[J]. 长沙理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2025, 40(4): 47-57.
[2] 张永光. “人工生命”研究进展[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2000(3): 169-173.
[3] 周露. 数字生命——第四种生命体[J]. 百科知识, 2014(6): 8-9.
[4] 张永光. 活在电脑上的“人工生命” [J]. 创新科技, 2007(2): 44-45.
[5] 曾一果, 昂振. 从“智人”到“数字人”: 数字生命的概念嬗变与表征形态[J]. 传媒观察, 2024(4): 63-70.
[6] 于鹏亮, 苏思怡. 数字永生: 技术与人文交织下的“生命”想象[J/OL]. 新媒体与社会, 1-11.
https://link.cnki.net/urlid/CN.20250825.1137.002, 2025-11-03.
[7] Rothaupt, J.W. and Becker, K. (2007) A Literature Review of Western Bereavement Theory: From Decathecting to Continuing Bonds. The Family Journal, 15, 6-15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] 涂序彦. 广义数字生命与经络数字人体[J]. 中国医学影像技术, 2003(S1): 25-27.
[9] 张劲松. 人是机器的尺度——论人工智能与人类主体性[J]. 自然辩证法研究, 2017, 33(1): 49-54.
[10] 杜骏飞. 何以为人?——AI兴起与数字化人类[J]. 南京社会科学, 2023(3): 76-85.
[11] 田少波, 田野. 元宇宙的伦理风险与应对[J]. 浙江理工大学学报(社会科学), 2023, 50(6): 687-695.
[12] 郭庆光. 传播学教程[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2002.
[13] 田少波, 田野. 元宇宙的伦理风险及其应对——基于预知性技术伦理的分析[J]. 武汉理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2024, 37(2): 9-19.