“在地性”与“活态性”:小学非遗美育课程设计的理论构建与路径思考
“Locality” and “Liveness”: Theoretical Construction and Pathway Reflection on Primary School Intangible Cultural Heritage Aesthetic Education Curriculum Design
摘要: 针对小学非遗美育面临的文化空心化与儿童主体性缺失困境,本研究试图构建以“在地性”原则深植文化根脉、以“活态性”原则激活儿童主体的双原则框架。以嘉善干窑小学课程为例进行试验,通过“理解先于创造”的螺旋式学习过程,平衡文化传承以及创新表达需求,将文化认同内化为文化再造的动力,旨在为非遗美育的系统化发展提供兼具理论深度与实践操作性的课程设计范式。
Abstract: In response to the challenges of cultural hollowing and the lack of children’s subjectivity in primary school intangible cultural heritage (ICH) aesthetic education, this study aims to construct a dual-principle framework that deeply roots cultural heritage through the principle of “locality” and activates children’s agency through the principle of “liveness.” Using the curriculum design at Ganyao Primary School in Jiashan as a case study, the research explores a spiral learning process that prioritizes “understanding before creation,” balancing the needs of cultural transmission and innovative expression. By internalizing cultural identity as a driving force for cultural reinvention, this study seeks to provide a theoretically grounded and practically operable curriculum design paradigm for the systematic development of ICH aesthetic education.
文章引用:吴磊. “在地性”与“活态性”:小学非遗美育课程设计的理论构建与路径思考[J]. 创新教育研究, 2025, 13(11): 148-156. https://doi.org/10.12677/ces.2025.1311851

参考文献

[1] 郭海洋, 吉宇飞. 地方课程的“在地性”追求[J]. 教学与管理, 2024(36): 74-79.
[2] 郭翠潇. 从“非物质文化遗产”到“活态遗产”——联合国教科文组织术语选择事件史循证研究[J]. 西北民族研究, 2023(6): 105-117.
[3] 郑雪松. 中小学非物质文化遗产校本课程开发[J]. 课程∙教材∙教法, 2017, 37(1): 95-100.
[4] 吴彤. 两种“地方性知识”——兼评吉尔兹和劳斯的观点[J]. 自然辩证法研究, 2007(11): 87-94.
[5] 周飞舟. 从“志在富民”到“文化自觉”: 费孝通先生晚年的思想转向[J]. 社会, 2017, 37(4): 143-187.
[6] 王铭铭. 所谓“地方性”, 所谓“世界性” [J]. 开放时代, 2024(1): 81-89, 7.
[7] Zhou, L., Zou, X., Huang, Y., Li, Y., Guo, L. and Fu, J. (2023) Inheritance and Innovation of Pottery Sculpture Technique in Shiwan, China: A Grounded Study from Cultural Ecology. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20, Article 3344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] 周姣术, 朱华. 浅谈皮亚杰认知发展理论对当代教育教学的意义[J]. 学理论, 2017(8): 172-173.
[9] 佐斌. 论儿童国家认同感的形成[J]. 教育研究与实验, 2000(2): 33-37, 72-73.
[10] Assmann, J. (2011) Communicative and Cultural Memory. In: Meusburger, P., Heffernan, M. and Wunder, E., Eds., Cultural Memories, Springer, 15-27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] 刘魁立. 非物质文化遗产传承: 在创造性转化、创新性发展中赓续中华文脉[J]. 中国青年, 2025(2): 8-9.
[12] 李晓丽. 布鲁纳学习理论及其对教学工作的启示[J]. 教育探索, 2015(11): 5-8.
[13] 衣新发, 于尧, 王冰洁, 等. 托兰斯及其创造力的测量与教学研究[J]. 贵州民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2019(4): 74-106.