凯兴斯泰纳教育思想在近代中国的传播研究
Research on the Spread of Kerschensteiner’s Educational Thought in Modern China
摘要: 二十世纪初,我国经历着剧烈的社会变革,教育领域面临着诸多新要求,教育翻译活动勃兴,传播媒介蓬勃发展,凯兴斯泰纳教育思想契合我国教育新需求,在我国开始传播,呈现出传播内容集中于劳作教育思想、引介学习与辩证批判相结合、传播方式兼及间接研究与直接翻译等特征。凯氏教育思想的传播在一定程度上推动我国近代教育变革与发展,对当前教育思想交流与互鉴具有历史镜鉴意义。
Abstract: In the early 20th century, China underwent profound social transformations, and the field of education faced numerous new demands. Educational translation activities flourished, and mass media experienced rapid development. Kerschensteiner’s educational philosophy, which aligned with China’s new educational needs, began to spread in the country. Its dissemination was characterized by a concentration on labor education ideas, a combination of introduction and dialectical critique, and the adoption of both indirect research and direct translation methods. The spread of Kerschensteiner’s educational thought contributed to the modernization and development of China’s education system to some extent, offering historical insights for contemporary educational exchanges and mutual learning.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
李化方. 欧美劳作教育思想史[M]. 上海: 商务印书馆, 1936: 248.
|
|
[2]
|
严锐. 二十世纪二三十年代欧美劳作教育思想对中国教育的影响研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2017.
|
|
[3]
|
喻永庆. 近代教育期刊与中国近代教育史研究[J]. 河北师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2010, 12(9): 33-38.
|
|
[4]
|
舒新城. 世界教育新潮: 最近英德美三国之教育方法[J]. 教育杂志, 1927(4): 1-11.
|
|
[5]
|
金荣轩. 世界教育新潮: 最近德国的劳动教育学说与劳动学校组织[J]. 教育杂志, 1931(2): 61-72.
|
|
[6]
|
张安国. 论着: 与地方教育人士谈谈劳作教育之理论与实际[J]. 江西教育行政旬刊, 1932(7): 9-17.
|
|
[7]
|
蒋径三. 文化教育学的理论与方法[J]. 教育杂志, 1929(4): 13-23.
|
|
[8]
|
(德)啓享斯泰因. 教育家的精神[M]. 余志遠, 译. 上海: 商务印书馆, 1926: 1-65.
|