时尚行业派遣员工获得主观职业成功的途径——无边界职业态度视角的研究
The Ways for Dispatched Employees in the Fashion Industry to Achieve Subjective Career Success—A Research from the Perspective of Career Boundarylessness
摘要: 随着劳动力市场的发展与变革,越来越多的员工与组织间建立了不同于传统的雇佣关系,具有双重职业身份的员工成为了组织需要关注的对象。越来越多的研究开始讨论该群体要如何提高绩效表现、获得成功。本研究以时尚行业派遣员工为研究对象,探讨他们的无边界职业态度对主观职业成功的影响。基于社会认同与职业发展理论,本研究重点探讨双重组织认同在其中起到的中介作用以及用工单位团队沟通的边界效应。本研究采用线上线下相结合的方式发放问卷,对416名时尚行业的派遣员工搜集数据并进行分析。结果表明,无边界职业态度发挥不同作用,其中的无边界思想能通过提升双重组织认同正向影响主观职业成功,而组织流动性偏好则会降低双重组织认同进而负向影响主观职业成功。同时,用工单位团队沟通在双重组织认同与主观职业成功之间起到调节作用。本研究同时考虑了个体层面和团队层面的因素,针对同时具有双重组织情境的派遣员工构建了一个影响主观职业成功的机制,有助于深化对该群体职业发展的理解,也为涉及派遣员工的人力资源管理实践提供了启示。
Abstract: With the development and transformation of the labor market, an increasing number of employees have established employment relationships with organizations that are different from the traditional ones. Organizations need to pay attention to the group of employees with dual organizational identities. More and more research has begun to discuss how this group can improve their performance and achieve success. This study takes dispatched employees in the fashion industry as the research object and explores the impact of their career boundarylessness on subjective career success. Based on the Social Identity Theory of and Career Development Theory, this study focuses on the mediating role of dual organizational identification and the boundary effect of team communication in the employing organization. This study adopted a combination of online and offline methods to distribute questionnaires and collected data from 416 dispatched employees in the fashion industry. Data analyses results show that the two dimensions of career boundarylessness play different roles. The boundaryless mindset can positively influence subjective career success by enhancing dual organizational identity, while organizational mobility preference reduces dual organizational identity and negatively affects subjective career success. At the same time, team communication in the employing organization plays a moderating role between dual organizational identification and subjective career success. This study considers both individual-level and team-level factors, constructing a mechanism influencing subjective career success for dispatched employees with dual organizational contexts. This study helps deepen the understanding of the career development of this group and provides implications for human resource management practices involving dispatched employees.
文章引用:孔力, 任茜, 王云骏, 陈驰茵. 时尚行业派遣员工获得主观职业成功的途径——无边界职业态度视角的研究[J]. 现代管理, 2025, 15(11): 9-22. https://doi.org/10.12677/mm.2025.1511287

参考文献

[1] 陈驰茵, 翁灵双. 雇佣身份多样性情境下的员工工作场所包容感: 匹配理论视角下的形成机制研究[J]. 中国人力资源开发, 2021, 38(8): 6-20.
[2] Cappelli, P. and Keller, J. (2013) Classifying Work in the New Economy. Academy of Management Review, 38, 575-596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Defillippi, R.J. and Arthur, M.B. (1994) The Boundaryless Career: A Competency-Based Perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, 307-324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Arthur, M.B. and Rousseau, D.M. (1996) The Boundaryless Career: A New Employment Principle for a New Organizational Era. Oxford University Press.
[5] Sweet, S. and Meiksins, P. (2008) Changing Contours of Work: Jobs and Opportunities in the New Economy. Sage.
[6] Sullivan, S.E. and Arthur, M.B. (2006) The Evolution of the Boundaryless Career Concept: Examining Physical and Psychological Mobility. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69, 19-29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Arthur, M.B. (1994) The Boundaryless Career: A New Perspective for Organizational Inquiry. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, 295-306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] 任茜. 无边界职业态度对主观职业成功的影响: 双重组织认同的中介影响机制[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 上海: 东华大学, 2023.
[9] Guan, Y., Arthur, M.B., Khapova, S.N., Hall, R.J. and Lord, R.G. (2019) Career Boundarylessness and Career Success: A Review, Integration and Guide to Future Research. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 110, 390-402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Briscoe, J.P., Hall, D.T. and Frautschy DeMuth, R.L. (2006) Protean and Boundaryless Careers: An Empirical Exploration. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69, 30-47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] 栾宇翔, 赵国龙. 亲组织不道德行为与职业成功的交叉滞后分析[J]. 领导科学, 2025(5): 110-118.
[12] Arthur, M.B., Khapova, S.N. and Wilderom, C.P.M. (2005) Career Success in a Boundaryless Career World. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 177-202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Weick, K.E. (1996) Enactment and the Boundary Less Career: Organizing as We Work. In: Arthur, M.B. and Rousseau, D.M., Eds., The Boundaryless Career, Oxford University Press, 40-57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Rothwell, W.J. and Sredl, H.J. (1992) The ASTD Reference Guide to Professional Human Resource Development Roles and Competencies. 2nd Edition, HRD Press.
[15] Verbruggen, M. (2012) Psychological Mobility and Career Success in the ‘New’ Career Climate. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 81, 289-297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Forrier, A. and Sels, L. (2003) Temporary Employment and Employability: Training Opportunities and Efforts of Temporary and Permanent Employees in Belgium. Work, Employment and Society, 17, 641-666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Orpen, C. (1994) The Effects of Organizational and Individual Career Management on Career Success. International Journal of Manpower, 15, 27-37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] De Vos, A., Dewettinck, K. and Buyens, D. (2009) The Professional Career on the Right Track: A Study on the Interaction between Career Self-Management and Organizational Career Management in Explaining Employee Outcomes. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 18, 55-80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] Kondratuk, T.B., Hausdorf, P.A., Korabik, K. and Rosin, H.M. (2004) Linking Career Mobility with Corporate Loyalty: How Does Job Change Relate to Organizational Commitment? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 65, 332-349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] Maertz, C.P. and Griffeth, R.W. (2004) Eight Motivational Forces and Voluntary Turnover: A Theoretical Synthesis with Implications for Research. Journal of Management, 30, 667-683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] March, J.G. and Simon, H.A. (1958) Organizations. Wiley.
[22] Ashforth, B.E. and Mael, F. (1989) Social Identity Theory and the Organization. The Academy of Management Review, 14, 20-39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[23] Tajfel, H. (1974) Social Identity and Intergroup Behaviour. Social Science Information, 13, 65-93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[24] Bhattacharya, C.B., Rao, H. and Glynn, M.A. (1995) Understanding the Bond of Identification: An Investigation of Its Correlates among Art Museum Members. Journal of Marketing, 59, 46-57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[25] 喻登科, 严红玲, 吴文君. 知识型员工知性特质与创新潜能: 组织认同的中介调节作用[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2021, 38(24): 142-150.
[26] Zhu, J., Xu, S. and Zhang, B. (2020) The Paradoxical Effect of Inclusive Leadership on Subordinates’ Creativity. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article ID: 2960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] He, H. and Brown, A.D. (2013) Organizational Identity and Organizational Identification: A Review of the Literature and Suggestions for Future Research. Group & Organization Management, 38, 3-35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[28] Zhou, Q., Martinez, L.F., Ferreira, A.I. and Rodrigues, P. (2016) Supervisor Support, Role Ambiguity and Productivity Associated with Presenteeism: A Longitudinal Study. Journal of Business Research, 69, 3380-3387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[29] 周文霞, 谢宝国, 辛迅, 等. 人力资本、社会资本和心理资本影响中国员工职业成功的元分析[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(2): 251-263.
[30] 吴隆增, 刘军, 梁淑美, 等. 辱虐管理与团队绩效:团队沟通与集体效能的中介效应[J]. 管理评论, 2013, 25(8): 151-159.
[31] Patrashkova-Volzdoska, R.R., McComb, S.A., Green, S.G. and Compton, W.D. (2003) Examining a Curvilinear Relationship between Communication Frequency and Team Performance in Cross-Functional Project Teams. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 50, 262-269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[32] 杨付, 张丽华. 团队沟通、工作不安全氛围对创新行为的影响:创造力自我效能感的调节作用[J]. 心理学报, 2012, 44(10): 1383-1401.
[33] 李金生, 乔盈. 高新技术企业研发团队沟通行为对自主创新绩效的影响——以知识吸收能力为中介变量[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2020, 37(11): 136-144.
[34] 王婷, 杨付. 无边界职业生涯下职业成功的诱因与机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(8): 1488-1500.
[35] Mael, F. and Ashforth, B.E. (1992) Alumni and Their Alma Mater: A Partial Test of the Reformulated Model of Organizational Identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 103-123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[36] Greenhaus, J.H., Parasuraman, S. and Wormley, W.M. (1990) Effects of Race on Organizational Experience, Job Performance Evaluations, and Career Outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 64-86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[37] O'Reilly, C.A. and Roberts, K.H. (1977) Task Group Structure, Communication, and Effectiveness in Three Organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 674-681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[38] Briscoe, J.P., Henagan, S.C., Burton, J.P. and Murphy, W.M. (2012) Coping with an Insecure Employment Environment: The Differing Roles of Protean and Boundaryless Career Orientations. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80, 308-316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[39] 王忠军, 杨彬, 汪义广, 等. 无边界职业生涯取向与青年员工职业成功: 职业胜任力的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(6): 812-818.
[40] Enache, M., Sallan, J.M., Simo, P. and Fernandez, V. (2011) Examining the Impact of Protean and Boundaryless Career Attitudes Upon Subjective Career Success. Journal of Management & Organization, 17, 459-473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[41] Turner, J.C., Oakes, P.J., Haslam, S.A. and McGarty, C. (1994) Self and Collective: Cognition and Social Context. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 454-463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[42] 李虎. 临时性员工管理: 文献综述和趋势展望[J]. 经济体制改革, 2013(1): 112-116.