农村儿童留守的多维影响因素研究——基于Logistic回归模型的分析
A Study on Multidimensional Influencing Factors of Rural Left-Behind Children—An Analysis Based on a Logistic Regression Model
DOI: 10.12677/ass.2025.14111021, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 徐 强:华南农业大学公共管理学院,广东 广州;周 杨*:广东工业大学管理学院,广东 广州
关键词: 留守儿童影响因素Logistic回归模型Rural Left-Behind Children Influencing Factors Logistic Regression Model
摘要: 本研究基于韶关市516份农村家庭问卷调查数据,采用二元Logistic回归模型,从儿童个人、家庭、农民工生存状态及社会四个维度实证分析农村儿童留守的影响因素。研究发现:儿童年龄增长会显著提升留守风险;父母职业稳定性高与家庭收入增加是重要保护因素;务工迁移距离远加剧留守,而务工年限长则促进随迁;务工地优质教学资源显著降低留守发生比。研究表明,农村儿童留守是家庭在个体发展、经济资本、就业状态与公共服务等多重约束下的复杂决策结果,破解这一困境需系统推进公共服务均等化、农村产业升级与社区支持网络构建。
Abstract: Based on questionnaire data from 516 rural households in Shaoguan City, this study employs a binary logistic regression model to empirically analyze the influencing factors of rural left-behind children from four dimensions: individual characteristics of the children, family attributes, migrant workers’ living conditions, and social context. The findings indicate that older children face a significantly higher risk of being left behind. Higher occupational stability of parents and increased household income serve as important protective factors, while longer migration distance of migrant workers increases the likelihood of children being left behind. In contrast, longer duration of migrant work promotes child accompaniment. Moreover, better teaching resources in destination areas significantly reduce the odds of children being left behind. The study concludes that the phenomenon of rural left-behind children stems from a complex decision-making process by households under multiple constraints, including child development, economic capital, employment status, and public service accessibility. Resolving this issue requires systematic improvements in equal access to public services, upgrading of rural industries, and the establishment of community-based support networks.
文章引用:徐强, 周杨. 农村儿童留守的多维影响因素研究——基于Logistic回归模型的分析[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2025, 14(11): 475-484. https://doi.org/10.12677/ass.2025.14111021

参考文献

[1] 李尧. 教育公共服务、户籍歧视与流动人口居留意愿[J]. 财政研究, 2020(6): 92-104.
[2] 吴贾, 张俊森. 随迁子女入学限制、儿童留守与城市劳动力供给[J]. 经济研究, 2020, 55(11): 138-155.
[3] 梁文泉. 不安居, 则不消费: 为什么排斥外来人口不利于提高本地人口的收入? [J]. 管理世界, 2018, 34(1): 78-87+191-192.
[4] 冯帅章, 陈媛媛. 学校类型与流动儿童的教育——来自上海的经验证据[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2012, 11(4): 1455-1476.
[5] Li, T., Han, L., Zhang, L. and Rozelle, S. (2014) Encouraging Classroom Peer Interactions: Evidence from Chinese Migrant Schools. Journal of Public Economics, 111, 29-45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] 吴贾, 姚先国, 张俊森. 城乡户籍歧视是否趋于止步——来自改革进程中的经验证据: 1989-201[J]. 经济研究, 2015, 50(11): 148-160.
[7] Hu, F. (2018) Migrant Peers in the Classroom: Is the Academic Performance of Local Students Negatively Affected? Journal of Comparative Economics, 46, 582-597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] 孙伟增, 张思思. 房租上涨如何影响流动人口的消费与社会融入——基于全国流动人口动态监测调查数据的实证分析[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2022, 22(1): 153-174.
[9] 邢春冰, 张晓敏. 子女随迁与流动人口的工资收入[J]. 财经研究, 2022, 48(9): 79-93.
[10] 陶然, 孔德华, 曹广忠. 流动还是留守: 中国农村流动人口子女就学地选择与影响因素考察[J]. 中国农村经济, 2011(6): 37-44.
[11] 宋锦, 李实. 农民工子女随迁决策的影响因素分析[J]. 中国农村经济, 2014(10): 48-61.
[12] 王春超, 张呈磊. 子女随迁与农民工的城市融入感[J]. 社会学研究, 2017, 32(2): 199-224+245-246.
[13] Chen, Z., Li, B. and Li, T. (2019) Exports and Left-Behind Children: Empirical Evidence from the China Migrants Dynamic Survey. Review of International Economics, 27, 1081-1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] 梁宏, 任焰. 流动, 还是留守?——农民工子女流动与否的决定因素分析[J]. 人口研究, 2010, 34(2): 57-65.
[15] 孙妍, 林树明, 邢春冰. 迁移、男孩偏好与教育机会[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2020, 19(1): 189-208.
[16] 何炤华, 杨菊华. 安居还是寄居?不同户籍身份流动人口居住状况研究[J]. 人口研究, 2013, 37(6): 17-34.