品牌联名式产品创新的影响因素与作用机制研究——基于fsQCA方法
Research on the Influencing Factors and Mechanism of Brand-Linked Product Innovation—Based on the fsQCA Method
DOI: 10.12677/ass.2025.14111026, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 冯楚然, 魏小娅, 徐丽媛, 胡甜甜, 陈锦思, 马焕然:天津财经大学国际工商学院,天津
关键词: 品牌联名fsQCA双元创新Co-Branded fsQCA Dual Innovation
摘要: 随着经济增长、产品多样化、人们的消费需求不断升级,为产品创新发展提供新的机遇,使品牌从单一方发展转为多品牌联名式协同发展。本项目基于MOA理论模型,结合双元创新理论、开放式创新理论、动态能力理论等,采用问卷调查、模糊集定性比较分析(fsQCA)等方法,探讨动机条件(Motivation)下的协同溢价、文化协同,能力条件(Ability)下的品牌关联度、供应链互补、认知合法性,与机会条件(Opportunity)下的需求多元化六个前因变量形成的潜在组态与企业联名式创新之间的复杂因果关系,归纳企业联名的形成机制,为企业在社会经济迅速发展的情境下通过联名提高创新能力与驱动企业成长提供理论基础与决策依据。
Abstract: With economic growth, product diversification, and the continuous upgrading of people’s consumption demands, new opportunities have emerged for product innovation and development, leading brands to shift from single-brand development to collaborative development through co-branding. This project is based on the MOA theoretical model and integrates theories such as ambidextrous innovation, open innovation, and dynamic capability theory. It employs methods such as questionnaire surveys and fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) to explore the complex causal relationship between the potential configurations formed by six antecedent variables—collaborative premium and cultural synergy under the motivation condition (Motivation), brand association, supply chain complementarity, and cognitive legitimacy under the ability condition (Ability), and demand diversification under the opportunity condition (Opportunity)—and co-branding innovation. It aims to summarize the formation mechanism of co-branding and provide a theoretical basis and decision-making reference for enterprises to enhance their innovation capabilities and drive growth through co-branding in the context of rapid social and economic development.
文章引用:冯楚然, 魏小娅, 徐丽媛, 胡甜甜, 陈锦思, 马焕然. 品牌联名式产品创新的影响因素与作用机制研究——基于fsQCA方法[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2025, 14(11): 527-537. https://doi.org/10.12677/ass.2025.14111026

参考文献

[1] Chesbrough, H.W. (2003) Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Harvard Business Press.
[2] Benner, M.J. and Tushman, M.L. (2003) Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited. The Academy of Management Review, 28, 238-256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Teece, D.J., Pisano, G. and Shuen, A. (1997) Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 509-533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Eisenhardt, K.M. and Martin, J.A. (2000) Dynamic Capabilities: What Are They? Strategic Management Journal, 21, 1105-1121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] 辛智琳. 轻资产企业间并购协同价值评估模型优化研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 北京: 北京交通大学, 2020.
[6] 刘佳叶. 基于哈佛分析框架下企业并购协同效应的研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 昆明: 云南财经大学, 2021.
[7] 郭莉, 董庆多. 环境规制、组织合法性与企业绿色创新[J]. 工业技术经济, 2022, 41(2): 52-61.
[8] Fischer, M., Völckner, F. and Sattler, H. (2010) How Important Are Brands? A Cross-Category, Cross-Country Study. Journal of Marketing Research, 47, 823-839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Frankel, R., Bolumole, Y.A., Eltantawy, R.A., Paulraj, A. and Gundlach, G.T. (2008) The Domain and Scope of SCM’s Foundational Disciplines—Insights and Issues to Advance Research. Journal of Business Logistics, 29, 1-30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] 安娜. 从“加减乘除”看品牌协同营销与品牌文化匹配[J]. 教育现代化, 2017(38): 346-347+71.
[11] 邓田生, 皮爱平. 基于协同效应下企业并购的经济条件分析[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2001(11): 16-18.
[12] 赵文红, 薛朝阳. 创业团队异质性、认知合法性与资源获取关系研究[J]. 管理学报, 2017, 14(4): 537-544.
[13] 魏江, 陈光沛. 同构如何影响企业融入开源社区创新: 认知合法性的中介作用[J]. 科学学研究, 2021, 39(10): 1860-1869.
[14] Fiss, P.C. (2011) Building Better Causal Theories: A Fuzzy Set Approach to Typologies in Organization Research. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 393-420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] 张明, 杜运周. 组织与管理研究中QCA方法的应用: 定位、策略和方向[J]. 管理学报, 2019(9): 1312-1323.
[16] Schneider, C.Q. and Wagemann, C. (2012) Set-Theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences: A Guide to Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef