新文科视域下法律与计算机科学融合路径研究——以“公共安全视频监控的法律规制”为例
Research on the Integration Path of Law and Computer Science under the Perspective of New Liberal Arts—Taking “Legal Regulation of Public Security Video Surveillance” as an Example
DOI: 10.12677/ces.2025.1311876, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 陈德强:华东政法大学刑事法学院,上海;郑 洁:东华大学数学系,上海
关键词: 新文科计算法学学科交叉视频监控法律规制New Liberal Arts Computational Law Interdisciplinary Video Surveillance Legal Regulation
摘要: 在新文科建设战略背景下,本研究以“公共安全视频监控的法律规制”为切入点,探索法律与计算机科学的融合路径,构建“法学与计算机科学”深度融合的交叉学科范式。研究设计并实践了《计算法学导论》课程体系,通过将抽象法律规则转化为可计算模型、厘清计算法学的学科定位,并搭建“理论–技术–应用”教学框架,以突破传统学科壁垒。实践层面,聚焦公共安全视频监控数据的法律规制难题,开发融合法律案例与算法模型的案例库,构建隐私保护与公共安全平衡的量化模型,为公共安全治理现代化提供理论与技术支撑。教学创新方面,建立“基础理论–数据建模–项目实践–竞赛毕业设计”四阶递进式培养体系,通过课程、竞赛与毕业论文的联动,系统强化学生跨学科思维。教学反馈显示,课程获得98%的满意度,学生高度认可其在复合能力培养方面的价值。
Abstract: Under the strategic background of New Liberal Arts construction, this research takes the “Legal Regulation of Public Security Video Surveillance” as a starting point to explore the integration path of law and computer science, aiming to construct an interdisciplinary paradigm characterized by the deep integration of “Law and Computer Science.” The study designed and implemented an “Introduction to Computational Law” course system. By transforming abstract legal rules into computable models, clarifying the disciplinary positioning of computational law, and establishing a “theory-technology-application” teaching framework, it seeks to break through traditional disciplinary barriers. On the practical level, focusing on the legal regulatory challenges of public security video surveillance data, the research developed a case library integrating legal cases and algorithmic models. It constructed a quantitative model to balance privacy protection and public safety, providing theoretical and technical support for the modernization of public security governance. In terms of teaching innovation, a four-stage progressive training system—“basic theory, data modeling, project practice, and competition/graduation project”—was established. This system, linking coursework, academic competitions, and thesis work, systematically enhances students’ interdisciplinary thinking. Teaching feedback shows a 98% satisfaction rate for the course, with students highly recognizing its value in cultivating composite abilities.
文章引用:陈德强, 郑洁. 新文科视域下法律与计算机科学融合路径研究——以“公共安全视频监控的法律规制”为例[J]. 创新教育研究, 2025, 13(11): 340-349. https://doi.org/10.12677/ces.2025.1311876

参考文献

[1] 申卫星, 刘云. 法学研究新范式: 计算法学的内涵, 范畴与方法[J]. 法学研究, 2020, 42(5): 3-23.
[2] 季卫东. 计算法学的疆域[J]. 高等学校文科学术文摘, 2021, 38(4): 140-141.
[3] (美) Barfield Woodrow, (意大利) Pagallo Ugo. 法律与人工智能高级导论[M]. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 2022.
[4] 陈德强. 结合美国国际数学建模竞赛提升文科生学术能力的研究与实践[J]. 数学学习与研究, 2019(6): 19-20.
[5] 邓矜婷. 计算法学方法初阶[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2021.
[6] 于晓虹. 计算法学: 展开维度, 发展趋向与视域前瞻[J]. 现代法学, 2020, 42(1): 158-178.
[7] 陈德强. 面向国际数学建模的“闭环”创新型第二课堂[J]. 大学教育, 2021(6): 109-111.
[8] 张妮, 蒲亦非. 计算法学导论[M]. 成都: 四川大学出版社, 2015.
[9] 林喜芬, 李铮. 论计算法学的全球发展趋势[J]. 上海交通大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2024, 32(6): 48-62.
[10] 李学尧, 刘庄. 算法时代的法治之路: 计算法学的规范性探索[J]. 交大法学, 2025(1): 86-100.
[11] 尹文嘉, 邱婷婷. 计算法学人才培养: 目标定位, 理论逻辑与实践路径[J]. 南宁师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2025, 42(2): 1-6.