基因检测指导的化疗与经验性化疗在晚期肺癌患者中的疗效和安全性差异分析
Efficacy and Safety of Genetic Testing-Guided Chemotherapy vs. Empiric Chemotherapy in Patients with Advanced Lung Cancer
DOI: 10.12677/acm.2025.15113252, PDF,   
作者: 熊雨芳:北华大学临床医学院,吉林 吉林;韦丽娜:永吉县第二人民医院急诊科,吉林 吉林;钟立哲*:北华大学附属医院心胸外科,吉林 吉林
关键词: 非小细胞癌基因检测治疗结果Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Genetic Testing Treatment Outcomes
摘要: 目的:本研究旨在探讨个体化精准治疗在晚期非小细胞肺癌患者化疗领域的应用。方法:选取2023年9月到2025年6月北华大学附属医院心胸血管外科收治的非小细胞肺癌患者30例作为研究对象。采用回顾性分析,将30例患者分为观察组(15例)和对照组(15例)。观察组患者对ERCC1、ERCC2、XRCC1、MTHFR和TYMS、GSTP1和RRM1基因进行检测后选择敏感药物进行化疗。对照组采用紫杉醇联合铂类进行化疗。比较两组患者化疗后,经CT图像测量所得肿瘤最大长径变化差异以及化疗相关不良反应。结果:观察组与对照组患者在第2周期化疗结束后同化疗前,经CT图像测量的肿瘤最大长径变化差值有统计学差异(P = 0.030)。观察组与对照组患者第4周期化疗结束后同第2周期化疗后,经CT图像测量的肿瘤最大长径变化差值有统计学差异(P = 0.014)。安全性分析表明,两组在血液学毒性、肝肾毒性和消化系统反应等方面未见显著差异(P > 0.05)。结论:观察组与对照组在第2周期、第4周期化疗后肿瘤大小变化有显著差异。观察组与对照组患者分别在第2周期化疗结束后同化疗前,第4周期化疗结束后同第2周期化疗后,经CT图像测量的肿瘤最大长径变化差值有统计学差异。安全性分析表明,两组在血液学毒性、肝肾毒性和消化系统反应等方面未见显著差异。基因检测指导化疗显著提高短期疗效。
Abstract: Objective: To explore the application of individualized precision therapy in chemotherapy for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 30 NSCLC patients treated in the Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Beihua University, from September 2023 to June 2025. Patients were assigned to an observation group (n = 15) and a control group (n = 15). The observation group underwent genetic testing for ERCC1, ERCC2, XRCC1, MTHFR, TYMS, GSTP1, and RRM1, and subsequently received chemotherapy regimens selected according to predicted drug sensitivity. The control group received paclitaxel combined with a platinum agent. The primary outcome was the change in the maximum long-axis tumor diameter on CT imaging after chemotherapy. Chemotherapy-related adverse events were also compared. Results: Relative to baseline, the between-group difference in the change of maximum long-axis tumor diameter at the end of cycle 2 was statistically significant (P = 0.030). From cycle 2 to the end of cycle 4, the between-group difference in the further change of tumor diameter remained significant (P = 0.014). Safety analyses showed no significant differences between groups in hematologic toxicity, hepatic/renal toxicity, or gastrointestinal reactions (all P > 0.05).Conclusions: Tumor size reduction differed significantly between the observation and control groups after cycles 2 and 4. Specifically, the changes from baseline to the end of cycle 2 and from cycle 2 to the end of cycle 4 were significantly different between groups. Safety profiles were comparable, with no significant differences in major toxicities. Genetic testing–guided chemotherapy significantly improves short-term efficacy.
文章引用:熊雨芳, 韦丽娜, 钟立哲. 基因检测指导的化疗与经验性化疗在晚期肺癌患者中的疗效和安全性差异分析[J]. 临床医学进展, 2025, 15(11): 1528-1533. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2025.15113252

参考文献

[1] Sung, H., Ferlay, J., Siegel, R.L., Laversanne, M., Soerjomataram, I., Jemal, A., et al. (2021) Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 71, 209-249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Molina, J.R., Yang, P., Cassivi, S.D., Schild, S.E. and Adjei, A.A. (2008) Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Treatment, and Survivorship. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 83, 584-594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Saito, S., Espinoza-Mercado, F., Liu, H., Sata, N., Cui, X. and Soukiasian, H.J. (2017) Current Status of Research and Treatment for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in Never-Smoking Females. Cancer Biology & Therapy, 18, 359-368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] National Cancer Institute (2017) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0. National Cancer Institute.
https://ctep.cancer.gov/protocoldevelopment/electronic_applications/docs/CTCAE_v5_Quick_Reference_5x7.pdf
[5] Tzvetkov, M.V., Behrens, G., O‘Brien, V.P., Hohloch, K., Brockmöller, J. and Benöhr, P. (2011) Pharmacogenetic Analyses of Cisplatin-Induced Nephrotoxicity Indicate a Renoprotective Effect of ercc1 Polymorphisms. Pharmacogenomics, 12, 1417-1427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Bradbury, P.A., Kulke, M.H., Heist, R.S., Zhou, W., Ma, C., Xu, W., et al. (2009) Cisplatin Pharmacogenetics, DNA Repair Polymorphisms, and Esophageal Cancer Outcomes. Pharmacogenetics and Genomics, 19, 613-625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Rumiato, E., Cavallin, F., Boldrin, E., Cagol, M., Alfieri, R., Basso, D., et al. (2013) ERCC1 C8092A (rs3212986) Polymorphism as a Predictive Marker in Esophageal Cancer Patients Treated with Cisplatin/5-Fu-Based Neoadjuvant Therapy. Pharmacogenetics and Genomics, 23, 597-604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Giovannetti, E., Pacetti, P., Reni, M., Leon, L.G., Mambrini, A., Vasile, E., et al. (2011) Association between DNA-Repair Polymorphisms and Survival in Pancreatic Cancer Patients Treated with Combination Chemotherapy. Pharmacogenomics, 12, 1641-1652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Meulendijks, D., Rozeman, E.A., Cats, A., Sikorska, K., Joerger, M., Deenen, M.J., et al. (2016) Pharmacogenetic Variants Associated with Outcome in Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer Treated with Fluoropyrimidine and Platinum-Based Triplet Combinations: A Pooled Analysis of Three Prospective Studies. The Pharmacogenomics Journal, 17, 441-451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Corrigan, A., Walker, J.L., Wickramasinghe, S., Hernandez, M.A., Newhouse, S.J., Folarin, A.A., et al. (2014) Pharmacogenetics of Pemetrexed Combination Therapy in Lung Cancer: Pathway Analysis Reveals Novel Toxicity Associations. The Pharmacogenomics Journal, 14, 411-417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Chen, J., Chao, Y., Bang, Y., Roca, E., Chung, H.C., Palazzo, F., et al. (2010) A Phase I/II and Pharmacogenomic Study of Pemetrexed and Cisplatin in Patients with Unresectable, Advanced Gastric Carcinoma. Anti-Cancer Drugs, 21, 777-784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Smit, E.F., Burgers, S.A., Biesma, B., Smit, H.J.M., Eppinga, P., Dingemans, A.C., et al. (2009) Randomized Phase II and Pharmacogenetic Study of Pemetrexed Compared with Pemetrexed Plus Carboplatin in Pretreated Patients with Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 27, 2038-2045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Powrózek, T., Kowalski, D.M., Krawczyk, P., Ramlau, R., Kucharczyk, T., Kalinka-Warzocha, E., et al. (2014) Correlation between TS, MTHFR, and ERCC1 Gene Polymorphisms and the Efficacy of Platinum in Combination with Pemetrexed First-Line Chemotherapy in Mesothelioma Patients. Clinical Lung Cancer, 15, 455-465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Tibaldi, C., Giovannetti, E., Vasile, E., Mey, V., Laan, A.C., Nannizzi, S., et al. (2008) Correlation of CDA, ERCC1, and XPD Polymorphisms with Response and Survival in Gemcitabine/Cisplatin-Treated Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients. Clinical Cancer Research, 14, 1797-1803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Tanaka, M., Javle, M., Dong, X., Eng, C., Abbruzzese, J.L. and Li, D. (2010) Gemcitabine Metabolic and Transporter Gene Polymorphisms Are Associated with Drug Toxicity and Efficacy in Patients with Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer. Cancer, 116, 5325-5335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Kim, S., Jeong, J., Kim, M., Cho, H., Ju, J., Kwon, Y., et al. (2008) Efficacy of Gemcitabine in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer According to Promoter Polymorphisms of the Ribonucleotide Reductase M1 Gene. Clinical Cancer Research, 14, 3083-3088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Dong, S., Guo, A., Chen, Z., Wang, Z., Zhang, X., Huang, Y., et al. (2010) RRM1 Single Nucleotide Polymorphism-37C→A Correlates with Progression-Free Survival in NSCLC Patients after Gemcitabine-Based Chemotherapy. Journal of Hematology & Oncology, 3, Article No. 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Galeotti, L., Ceccherini, F., Domingo, D., Laurino, M., Polillo, M., Di Paolo, A., et al. (2017) Association of the hOCT1/ABCB1 Genotype with Efficacy and Tolerability of Imatinib in Patients Affected by Chronic Myeloid Leukemia. Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, 79, 767-773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Liu, R., Zhao, X., Liu, X., Chen, Z., Qiu, L., Geng, R., et al. (2015) Influences of ERCC1, ERCC2, XRCC1, GSTP1, GSTT1, and MTHFR Polymorphisms on Clinical Outcomes in Gastric Cancer Patients Treated with EOF Chemotherapy. Tumor Biology, 37, 1753-1762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Gréen, H., Söderkvist, P., Rosenberg, P., Horvath, G. and Peterson, C. (2006) MDR-1 Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms in Ovarian Cancer Tissue: G2677T/A Correlates with Response to Paclitaxel Chemotherapy. Clinical Cancer Research, 12, 854-859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Wang, X., Wang, Y., Ma, K., Chen, X. and Li, W. (2014) MDM2 rs2279744 and TP53 rs1042522 Polymorphisms Associated with Etoposide-and Cisplatin-Induced Grade III/IV Neutropenia in Chinese Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients. Oncology Research and Treatment, 37, 176-180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]