“基础设施”概念及功能演变的话语历史分析
A Discourse-Historical Approach to the Conceptual and Functional Evolution of “Infrastructure”
DOI: 10.12677/ml.2025.13111183, PDF,   
作者: 殷明辉:上海大学外国语学院,上海
关键词: 话语历史分析基础设施概念功能Discourse Historical Approach Infrastructure Concept Function
摘要: 基础设施作为推动经济社会持续进步、提升民众生活品质的关键基石,是国家发展战略不可或缺的支撑力量。近年来,随着基础设施建设的蓬勃发展,其内涵与外延亦发生了深刻转型。本文采用话语历史分析系统梳理了2008~2024年间国务院发布的官方文件,借助Python进行关键词分析,旨在深入剖析基础设施政策话语是如何紧密嵌入国家发展进程与治理现代化的历史脉络之中的。研究发现,“基础设施”在概念和功能方面都产生了嬗变。从概念层面来看,基础设施正逐步转型为新型基础设施,并且“新基建”这一概念也逐渐成为国家政策文件中的关键词。在功能维度上,基础设施的演变已从单一的物理建设迈向了复杂的系统集成与智能化管理的新阶段。
Abstract: Infrastructure, as the cornerstone of promoting sustainable economic and social progress and enhancing people’s quality of life, is an indispensable support force for national development strategies. In recent years, with the vigorous promotion of infrastructure construction, its connotation and denotation have also undergone profound transformations. Adopting the unique perspective of discourse historical approach, this paper systematically sorts out the official documents issued by the State Council from 2008 to 2024 and utilizes Python for keyword analysis, aiming to delve into how the discourse of infrastructure policies is intimately embedded in the historical context of national development and governance modernization. Research has found that changes have occurred in the concept and functions of “infrastructure”. From the conceptual perspective, infrastructure is gradually transforming into new infrastructure, and the concept of “new infrastructure” has also increasingly become a key term in national policy documents. In terms of functionality, the evolution of infrastructure has shifted from simple physical construction to a new stage of complex system integration and intelligent management.
文章引用:殷明辉. “基础设施”概念及功能演变的话语历史分析[J]. 现代语言学, 2025, 13(11): 451-461. https://doi.org/10.12677/ml.2025.13111183

参考文献

[1] 叶波, 梁辉. 基础设施概念及其投资效应的时代演变研究[J]. 经济论坛, 2011(10): 110.
[2] 刘艳红, 黄雪涛, 石博涵. 中国“新基建”: 概念、现状与问题[J]. 北京工业大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 20(6): 1-11.
[3] 陈庆保. 基础设施涵义的演化[J]. 东南大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2007(S2): 104-105.
[4] 种及灵. 论BOT产生的现实和理论基础[J]. 改革, 2000(6): 115-120.
[5] 孙晓岭. 对西部大开发中应用BOT融资方式的几点思考[J]. 财经科学, 2000(S1): 152-154.
[6] 李霞. 考察美国菲尼克斯城市基础设施建设引发的思考[J]. 财经科学, 2003(S1): 125-126.
[7] 王胜文. 中国援助非洲基础设施建设的经验与展望[J]. 国际经济与合作, 2012(12): 7-9.
[8] 姜巍. “一带一路”沿线基础设施投资建设与中国的策略选择[J]. 国际贸易, 2017(12): 44-46.
[9] 周国光, 王一佼, 桂嘉伟, 白鹏霞. “一带一路”沿线省市交通基础设施投资效应研究[J]. 华东经济管理, 2019, 33(12): 5-12.
[10] 李彦, 章紫薇, 林晓燕. 数字基础设施对中国经济双循环发展的影响[J]. 统计与决策, 2024, 40(13): 102-107.
[11] 童健, 张聪, 闫勇. 新型基础设施建设与中国经济高质量发展[J]. 管理评论, 2024, 36(6): 81-93.
[12] 姬德强, 朱泓宇. 作为发展与治理话语的“基础设施”——基于2005-2020年的政策文本分析[J]. 中国新闻传播研究, 2021(3): 145-164.
[13] 樊振佳, 程乐天. 面向农村创业的信息服务体系: 政策分析和田野调查[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2017, 43(3): 87-103.
[14] Wodak, R. and Krzyżanowski, M. (2009) Qualitative Discourse Analysis in the Social Sciences. Palgrave Macmillan. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Reisigl. M. and Wodak, R. (2001) Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetoric of Racism Anti-Semitism. Routledge.
[16] Wodak, R. (2008) Introduction: Discourse Studies-Important Concepts and Terms. In: Wodak, R. and Krzyżanowski, M., Eds., Qualitative Discourse Analysis in the Social Sciences, Palgrave Macmillan, 1-29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Wodak, R. and Meyer, M. (2001) Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. Sage Publications.
[18] 杨敏. 露丝沃达克政治话语分析的学术研究[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2021.
[19] 王清宪. 新基建, 新能量, 新模式[J]. 经济参要, 2020(13): 2-10.