AIGC赋能高校艺术设计教育的价值重构、伦理挑战与范式跃迁
The Value Reconstruction, Ethical Challenges and Paradigm Shift of AIGC Empowering Art and Design Education in Colleges and Universities
摘要: 以ChatGPT为代表的生成式人工智能(AIGC)技术,通过整合数字技术、人工智能、大数据分析、智能算法及深度学习等前沿科技,对高校艺术设计教育生态进行深层次重塑。其在创意设计范式革新、智能化教学模式构建、产学研协同发展等维度展现出卓越赋能价值,推动艺术设计教育从标准化批量培养向差异化精准培育转型。然而,技术赋能过程中潜藏的技术应用失范、算法偏见固化及伦理监管缺位等问题,可能引发创意能力退化、专业技能弱化等教育异化现象,加剧思维模式固化、审美趋同化等认知困境,并衍生学术诚信危机与知识产权纠纷等制度性挑战。为系统性应对上述挑战,需构建多维协同策略:以创新实践能力培养为核心,实现理论认知与实践应用的深度耦合;以跨学科知识视野拓展为路径,培育开放性、批判性思维范式;以科技伦理教育强化为保障,完善学术规范体系建设。三者共同构成艺术设计教育智能化转型的质量保障机制,为新时代艺术设计教育可持续发展提供理论支撑与实践路径。
Abstract: The generative artificial intelligence (AIGC) technology represented by ChatGPT, by integrating digital technology, artificial intelligence, big data analysis, intelligent algorithms, and deep learning and other cutting-edge technologies, has deeply reshaped the educational ecosystem of art and design in colleges and universities. It has demonstrated outstanding enabling value in the innovation of creative design paradigms, the construction of intelligent teaching models, and the coordinated development of industry-university-research, promoting the transformation of art and design education from standardized batch cultivation to differentiated and precise nurturing. However, during the process of technological empowerment, there are potential problems such as the misuse of technology, the solidification of algorithmic bias, and the absence of ethical supervision, which may lead to the degradation of creative ability, the weakening of professional skills, and other educational alienation phenomena, intensify the cognitive predicaments such as the solidification of thinking patterns and the homogenization of aesthetics, and give rise to institutional challenges such as academic integrity crises and intellectual property disputes. To systematically address these challenges, a multi-dimensional collaborative strategy needs to be constructed: taking the cultivation of innovative practical abilities as the core to achieve a deep coupling of theoretical cognition and practical application; taking the expansion of interdisciplinary knowledge perspectives as the path to cultivate open and critical thinking paradigms; and taking the strengthening of technological ethics education as the guarantee to improve the academic norm system. The three together constitute the quality assurance mechanism for the intelligent transformation of art and design education, providing theoretical support and practical paths for the sustainable development of art and design education in the new era.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
OpenAI (2022) ChatGPT: Optimizing Language Models for Dialogue. https://openai.com/research/chatgpt
|
|
[2]
|
国务院. 2024年中央经济工作会议公报[Z]. 2024-12-12.
|
|
[3]
|
教育部. 高等学校人工智能创新行动计划[Z]. 2018-04-10.
|
|
[4]
|
周丽娜. 生成式人工智能赋能艺术创作的风险与应对[J]. 甘肃社会科学, 2025(2): 99-109.
|
|
[5]
|
郭延龙, 李萌. AIGC赋能高校艺术设计教育的价值意蕴、风险检视与发展向度[J]. 安庆师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2025, 44(3): 99-106.
|
|
[6]
|
周延伟, 于子尧, 王姮. 数智时代高校艺术设计人才人文素养培育研究[J]. 山东工艺美术学院学报, 2025(1): 45-50.
|
|
[7]
|
冯鸣阳, 曹蕊, 陈庆军. AIGC冲击下艺术设计教育的变革与重构: 机遇、范式与应对[J]. 工业工程设计, 2023, 8(5): 47-58.
|
|
[8]
|
杜丽娟. AIGC驱动的高校艺术设计课程教学改革与产教融合模式构建[J]. 吉林广播电视大学学报, 2024(5): 91-93.
|
|
[9]
|
舒尔茨. 人力资本投资: 教育和研究的作用[M]. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1990.
|
|
[10]
|
张蓝姗. 叙事危机: AIGC时代视听艺术表达的伦理困境与本真性重建[J]. 中国电视, 2025(7): 20-27.
|
|
[11]
|
施大宁. 学为中心, 智能向善——AI时代背景下教学模式变革的思考[J]. 中国大学教学, 2025(5): 4-8.
|
|
[12]
|
李旭光, 胡奕, 王曼, 陆颖颖, 冯瑄. 人工智能生成内容研究综述: 应用、风险与治理[J]. 图书情报工作, 2024, 68(17): 136-149.
|
|
[13]
|
王少. 机遇与挑战: AIGC赋能新时代思想政治教育[J]. 教学与研究, 2023(5): 106-116.
|
|
[14]
|
刘欣悦, 王建梁. 人工智能服务教育可持续发展目标——《人工智能与教育: 政策制定者指南》解读[J]. 世界教育信息, 2023, 36(1): 19-25.
|
|
[15]
|
周灵, 吕昱慧. 交叉与融合: 人工智能时代艺术设计教学的改革研究[J]. 甘肃社会科学, 2025(2): 116-118.
|