个税递延型养老产品是否促进了居民消费?
Does the Tax-Deferred Pension Product Promote Household Consumption?
DOI: 10.12677/fin.2025.156105, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 王 钱:西南民族大学经济学院,四川 成都
关键词: 个税递延型养老保险双重差分法居民消费Tax-Deferred Pension Product Difference-in-Differences (DID) Method Household Consumption
摘要: 本文基于2012~2022年中国家庭追踪调查(CFPS)数据,采用双重差分法(DID)实证研究个税递延型养老保险政策对居民消费的影响。研究发现:个税递延政策显著提升居民消费水平,税收优惠通过释放当期可支配收入激活消费动能。在收入维度,高收入群体消费显著提升;从金融素养方面来看,高金融素养群体消费显著增加,低素养群体无响应;在消费结构层面:政策显著刺激娱乐型消费,对生存型消费无影响,发展型消费正向但不显著。结合个人养老金的发展现状,建议通过分层税收激励、破解流动性约束、产品创新及金融教育优化制度设计,实现“养老储备–当期消费”协同发展。
Abstract: Based on the data from the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS) from 2012 to 2022, this paper empirically examines the impact of the tax-deferred commercial pension insurance policy on household consumption using the difference-in-differences (DID) method. The study finds that the tax-deferred policy significantly boosts household consumption levels, as tax incentives release disposable income in the current period, thereby stimulating consumption momentum. In terms of income dimension, consumption among high-income groups increases significantly. From the perspective of financial literacy, consumption significantly rises among groups with high financial literacy, while groups with low financial literacy show no response. At the consumption structure level, the policy significantly stimulates recreational consumption, has no impact on survival consumption, and shows a positive but insignificant effect on developmental consumption. Considering the current development of personal pensions, it is recommended to optimize the system design through tiered tax incentives, addressing liquidity constraints, product innovation, and financial education to achieve coordinated development of “pension reserves and current consumption”.
文章引用:王钱. 个税递延型养老产品是否促进了居民消费?[J]. 金融, 2025, 15(6): 992-1008. https://doi.org/10.12677/fin.2025.156105

参考文献

[1] 国家统计局. 2023年国民经济和社会发展统计公报[Z]. 2024.
[2] 国务院办公厅. 国务院办公厅关于推动个人养老金发展的意见(国办发[2022]7号) [Z]. 2022.
[3] Attanasi, P. and De Leire, T. (2002) IRA Participation and Household 10 Consumption. Journal of Public Economics, 84, 5-38.
[4] Hubbard, R.G., Skinner, J. and Zeldes, S.P. (1995) Precautionary Saving and Social Insurance. Journal of Political Economy, 103, 360-399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Madrian, B.C. and Shea, D.F. (2001) The Power of Suggestion: Inertia in 401(k) Participation and Savings Behavior. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116, 1149-1187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Epley, N., Mak, D. and Idson, L.C. (2006) Bonus of Rebate? The Impact of Income Framing on Spending and Saving. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 19, 213-227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Poterba, J.M., Venti, S.F. and Wise, D.A. (1996) How Retirement Saving Programs Increase Saving. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10, 91-112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Engen, E.M., Gale, W.G. and Scholz, J.K. (1996) The Illusory Effects of Saving Incentives on Saving. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10, 113-138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Poterba, J.M. (2014) Retirement Security in an Aging Population. American Economic Review, 104, 1-30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Gelber, A.M. (2011) How Do 401(k)s Affect Saving? Evidence from Changes in 401(k) Eligibility. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 3, 103-122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Benjamin, D.J. (2003) Does 401(k) Eligibility Increase Saving? Evidence from Propensity Score Subclassification. Journal of Public Economics, 87, 1259-1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Beshears, J., Chi, J.J., Laibson, D. and Madrian, B.C. (2018) Des Front-Lading Taxation Increase Savings? Evidence from Roth 401(k) Introduction. Journal of Public Economics, 167, 1-18.
[13] Gustman, A.L. and Steinmeier, T.L. (1999) Effects of Pensions on Savings: Analysis with Data from the Health and Retirement Study. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 50, 271-324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Chetty, R., Friedman, J.N., Leth-Petersen, S., Nielsen, T.H. and Olsen, T. (2014) Active vs. Passive Decisions and Crowd-Out in Retirement Savings Accounts: Evidence from Denmark. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 129, 1141-1219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] 白重恩, 李宏彬, 吴斌珍. 中国养老保险缴费对消费和储蓄的影响[J]. 中国社会科学, 2012, 33(2): 48-71.
[16] 朱铭来, 贾清显. 税延型商业养老保险试点政策效果分析——基于上海市的调研[J]. 保险研究, 2019, 41(11): 22-35.
[17] 孙祁祥, 锁凌燕. 税延养老保险试点效果评估与制度优化[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 42(8): 95-110.
[18] 董克用, 张栋, 孙博. 个人养老金参与意愿与消费行为调查——基于全国样本的实证分析[J]. 保险研究, 2023, 45(1): 3-15.
[19] 郑秉文. 个人养老金制度的三重挑战: 税优激励、流动性约束与消费平衡[J]. 经济与管理研究, 2023, 44(4): 3-16.
[20] 金维刚. 个人养老金制度促进消费的长期机制研究[J]. 中国社会保障, 2023, 30(5): 18-21.
[21] 蓝浩歌, 赵桂芹. 破解个人养老金制度激励不足之困: 普惠视角下税收优惠政策优化设计[J]. 经济理论与经济管理, 2024, 44(8): 117-132.