扬州戏曲古籍的文献整理与当代价值研究——以清代抄本、刻本为中心
The Documentary Collation and Contemporary Value Study of Yangzhou Opera Ancient Books—Focusing on Manuscripts and Block-Printed Editions of the Qing Dynasty
摘要: 扬州作为清代“花雅两部互动”的核心场域与戏曲演出重镇,留存的戏曲古籍承载着地域文化演进与戏曲史转型的关键信息,却长期处于零散存藏、研究薄弱的状态。本文以扬州图书馆、扬州大学图书馆等公立机构及本地私人藏家的清代戏曲抄本、刻本为研究对象,采用文献普查、版本比对与跨学科分析方法,对200余部古籍进行系统梳理,厘清其存藏脉络与版本特质。研究发现,“盐商资助刻本”与“地方戏改编本”构成扬州戏曲古籍的核心特色:前者印证了商业资本对戏曲文献刊刻、传播的支撑机制,后者呈现昆曲与扬州乱弹的声腔融合轨迹。结合《扬州画舫录》等文献互证,揭示该批古籍在“花雅合流”研究、地域戏曲生态还原中的核心价值,提出“保护–研究–实践”的当代传承路径。
Abstract: As a core venue for the “Hua-Ya Interaction” (the rivalry between refined and popular opera genres) and a major hub for opera performances in the Qing Dynasty, Yangzhou preserves ancient opera books that carry crucial information about the evolution of regional culture and the transformation of opera history. However, these books have long been scattered in storage and under-researched. Focusing on Qing Dynasty opera manuscripts and block-printed editions held by public institutions such as Yangzhou Library and Yangzhou University Library, as well as local private collectors, this paper systematically sorts out over 200 ancient books using methods including document surveys, version comparisons, and interdisciplinary analysis, clarifying their preservation context and version characteristics. The study finds that “block-printed editions funded by salt merchants” and “adapted editions of local operas” constitute the core features of Yangzhou’s ancient opera books: the former confirms the supporting mechanism of commercial capital for the engraving and dissemination of opera documents, while the latter presents the trajectory of the integration of the vocal styles of Kunqu Opera and Yangzhou Luantan (a local opera genre). By cross-verifying with documents such as Yangzhou Huafang Lu (Records of Painted Boats in Yangzhou), this paper reveals the core value of this collection of ancient books in the research on the “integration of Hua and Ya operas” and the restoration of the regional opera ecology, and proposes a contemporary inheritance path featuring the “trinity of protection-research-practice”.
文章引用:邱晓轩. 扬州戏曲古籍的文献整理与当代价值研究——以清代抄本、刻本为中心[J]. 艺术研究快报, 2025, 14(4): 533-539. https://doi.org/10.12677/arl.2025.144080

参考文献

[1] 李斗. 扬州画舫录[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 2001: 131-180.
[2] 中国古籍总目编纂委员会. 中国古籍总目∙集部[M]. 上海: 上海古籍出版社, 2010: 890-895.
[3] 王丽娟. 清代盐商与戏曲发展研究[J]. 戏曲艺术, 2019(2): 58-63.
[4] 扬州市文化广电和旅游局. 扬州戏曲史话[M]. 南京: 江苏人民出版社, 2021: 76-82.
[5] 扬州图书馆. 扬州图书馆古籍善本目录[Z]. 扬州: 扬州图书馆, 2005: 34-38.
[6] 扬州大学图书馆. 特藏部戏曲古籍整理报告[R]. 扬州: 扬州大学图书馆, 2018: 19-24.
[7] 周明初. 清代戏曲刻本研究[J]. 文献, 2022(3): 125-132.
[8] 陆萼庭. 昆剧演出史稿[M]. 上海: 上海古籍出版社, 2015: 210-218.
[9] 明光. 扬州盐商家班研究[J]. 艺术百家, 1990(4): 79-85.
[10] 王春晓. 乾隆时期戏曲研究: 以清代中叶戏曲发展的嬗变为核心[M]. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社, 2023: 156-163.
[11] 郑振铎. 中国戏曲的选本[M]//郑振铎文集: 第七卷. 北京: 人民文学出版社, 1988: 42-56.
[12] 朱崇志. 中国古代戏曲选本研究[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 2013: 18-25.
[13] 青木正儿. 中国近世戏曲史[M]. 王古鲁, 译. 北京: 中华书局, 2010: 312-320.
[14] 周贻白. 中国戏剧史长编[M]. 北京: 人民文学出版社, 2009: 689-705.
[15] 孙书磊. 清代戏曲选本研究[M]. 南京: 凤凰出版社, 2016: 89-97.
[16] (法)皮埃尔∙布尔迪厄. 文化资本与社会炼金术[M]. 包亚明, 译. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 1997: 192-201.