马克思自由时间理论对当代休闲文化的启示
The Enlightenment of Marx’s Theory of Free Time to Contemporary Leisure Culture
摘要: 劳动与休闲是社会时间分配的两个方面,也是人类生存与发展的基本状态。人的自由解放离不开劳动与休闲的协同推进,其核心要义不仅在于缩短劳动时长、扩充闲暇时间,更在于让劳动本身成为目的。随着当代社会生产力发展与物质生活水平提升,人们的自由时间增加,休闲文化成为社会生活重要组成部分,但也面临休闲方式异化、价值迷失及时间碎片化等问题。马克思的自由时间理论本质上是对资本主义生产和消费的双重批判,一方面要缩短劳动时间,增加人类发展自由时间。另一方面,需要摆脱消费主义主导下的享乐式休闲,让自由时间凝聚为“自由劳动”属性的积极休闲时间。在马克思主义自由观指导下,树立正确的劳动观念、理性的休闲观念,最终实现自由时间中劳动与休闲的融合。能够推动当代休闲文化健康发展,促进人民美好生活的构建,以及个体的发展进步,为社会进步注入动力。
Abstract: Labor and leisure are two facets of social time distribution and fundamental states of human survival and development. The free liberation of humanity is inseparable from the coordinated advancement of labor and leisure. Its core essence does not merely lie in shortening working hours and expanding leisure time, but more importantly, in making labor an end in itself. With the development of contemporary social productive forces and the improvement of material living standards, people have more free time, and leisure culture has become a significant component of social life. Nevertheless, it also confronts issues such as the alienation of leisure forms, the loss of values, and the fragmentation of time. Marx’s theory of free time is essentially a dual critique of capitalist production and consumption. On one hand, it is necessary to reduce labor time and increase the free time for human development. On the other hand, it is essential to break away from the hedonistic leisure dominated by consumerism and turn free time into positive leisure time with the attribute of “free labor”. Under the guidance of the Marxist view of freedom, by establishing correct labor concepts and rational leisure concepts, the integration of labor and leisure during free time can be ultimately achieved. This can promote the healthy development of contemporary leisure culture, facilitate the construction of people’s better lives, contribute to individual development and progress, and inject impetus into social advancement.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
晏辉. 论马克思的“时间”概念及其人类学意义[J]. 云南社会科学, 2020(5): 19-30.
|
|
[2]
|
马克思, 恩格斯. 马克思恩格斯全集: 第30卷[M]. 第2版. 中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局, 译. 北京: 人民出版社, 1995.
|
|
[3]
|
马克思, 恩格斯. 马克思恩格斯全集: 第47卷[M]. 第2版. 北京: 人民出版社, 2004.
|
|
[4]
|
卡莱尔·科西克. 具体的辩证法——关于人与世界问题的研究[M]. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 1989: 164.
|
|
[5]
|
马克思, 恩格斯. 马克思恩格斯文集: 第3卷[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2009: 70.
|
|
[6]
|
亚里士多德. 政治学[M]. 颜一, 秦典华, 译. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2003: 269.
|
|
[7]
|
刘海春. 休闲与自由——马克思自由伦理观的当代阐释[J]. 马克思主义与现实, 2020(1): 140-147.
|
|
[8]
|
Srnicek, N. (2017) Platform Capitalism. Polity Press, 89-92.
|
|
[9]
|
张莉. 马克思休闲思想的价值逻辑及其实践指引[J]. 西南石油大学学报(社会科学版), 2025, 27(1): 37-45.
|
|
[10]
|
Kelly, J.R. (2012) Leisure: The Basis of Culture. Transaction Publishers, 67-71.
|
|
[11]
|
Beck, U. and Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2002) Individualization: Institutionalized Individualism and Its Social and Political Consequences. Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[12]
|
马克思, 恩格斯. 马克思恩格斯全集第3卷[M]. 第2版. 北京: 人民出版社, 2002: 270.
|
|
[13]
|
格罗·詹纳. 资本主义的未来: 一种经济制度的胜利还是失败? [M]. 宋玮, 译. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2004.
|
|
[14]
|
刘海春. 论马克思人类解放的“劳动-休闲”之维[J]. 马克思主义与现实, 2016(6): 20-26.
|
|
[15]
|
马克思, 恩格斯. 马克思恩格斯选集: 第2卷[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2012.
|